Are feminists the 21st century version of Archie Bunker?
Are feminists the 21st century version of Archie Bunker? Yup, in some ways.
Archie was bigoted and openly judged an entire birth group.
Feminists openly judge an entire birth group.Archie refused to tolerate anyone who didn't share his opinions.
Feminists don't tolerate anyone who doesn't share their opinions.Archie ignored the pain and suffering of Blacks.
Feminists ignore the pain and suffering of men.Archie was dismissive and disrespectful of Blacks.
Feminists are dismissive and disrespectful of men.Archie thought Whites were superior to Blacks.
Feminists think Women are superior to Men.
Can you think of others?
But that is where the similarities seem to stop. Here's where Archie was very different:
Archie was funny.
He was a patriotic working class provider who loved his family.
He was grumpy but lovable.
Hi Tom
Archie was still a man. He loved and provided for his family.
I think his bigotry was an act; a defensive crust over his vulnerability. In the end he can only let people be who they are. He doesn’t throw out Gloria and Michael (and Michael/Meathead despite being progressive" is just as foolish, stubborn and sexist). Archie was merely wrong or misled; he did not create pernicious lies and then hold people to them.
He would have been against letter bombing campaigns and the harassment of war veterans as cowards.
Feminists would be better if he was in charge.
Thank you, Tom. The girl that committed the mass shooting in Madison, Wisconsin was a man-hating feminist. But the mainstream media is covering that fact up. Instead of the feminist Archie Bunker being exposed, the media is on the side of the new Archie Bunker.