Behind every great man...is an army of inconsequential women seeking to take credit for, honors related to, and the financial and social benefits of his work.
To be honest, we need to make male independent from Govenrment. I would love to see a society where taxes paid by males go to services to males. Males are not dependent on Government: women are. We should not push for male positivity: we need to ensure that male money is used in favour of males.
This + male solo spaces again (segregated school are a must) would suffice.
100% But I am not being segregated to become attrative. I want event that segregation. MGTOW is the best creation of the manosphere: I want men not needing women. Full liberation from women, which, in its turn, happens to be from Government.
The only way to restore balance btwn sexes is with the narrative of independient men. What we cannot hace is a narrative of independient women and depent men
It's uplifting to remind ourselves that men can be great and good, but we need to be careful with such historical men vs women comparisons, as there have also been many more "evil" men than women throughout history. It could be argued that the lower percentage of "great" (famous?) women in history is due to the structure of society and traditional roles, which have only recently been changing and equalising in terms of opportunity to be great/famous in the Western world. So in terms of greatness we really need to make a recent comparison, perhaps only the last 30 years in countries with roughly equal opportunities for both sexes. It would be interesting to see a study on this.
It's been done. Contrary to expectations the more "equal" nations eg those in Scandinavia and the like lead to more traditional choices being made by the majority.
Still today, most inventions and great things are being done by men. Just see AI. In Iceland, 80% of engeneers are men. We have been imvewting in the wrong gender.
Behind every great man...is an army of inconsequential women seeking to take credit for, honors related to, and the financial and social benefits of his work.
Men are only group to be net positive lifetime tax payers.
All other groups are supported directly and indirectly by mens labor and productivity.
Very true...something the other groups are quick NOT to admit.
To be honest, we need to make male independent from Govenrment. I would love to see a society where taxes paid by males go to services to males. Males are not dependent on Government: women are. We should not push for male positivity: we need to ensure that male money is used in favour of males.
This + male solo spaces again (segregated school are a must) would suffice.
Sex segregation makes sense.
No taxes without representation.
No welfare without gratitude.
Men need segregated status squads to develop competence and confidence to become attractive to women.
Women need to focus on having children in their early 20s and be funded in good faith with full respect and gratitude to men.
100% But I am not being segregated to become attrative. I want event that segregation. MGTOW is the best creation of the manosphere: I want men not needing women. Full liberation from women, which, in its turn, happens to be from Government.
I'm fine to need women.
We need oxygen from plants.
Food from farmers.
But women have gone mad and are no longer women. They're vindictive tyrants creating chaos. Possessed by the spirit of Jezebel, Lilith, and Marx.
The only way to restore balance btwn sexes is with the narrative of independient men. What we cannot hace is a narrative of independient women and depent men
Women gain independence by failing to have children.
This check mates our civilization.
We can have sexual equality for one generation before extinction.
Thats the point. They negotiate with their role. We need to start negotiating with ours.
They left Trey Parker and Matt Stone out of the great comedians....
It's uplifting to remind ourselves that men can be great and good, but we need to be careful with such historical men vs women comparisons, as there have also been many more "evil" men than women throughout history. It could be argued that the lower percentage of "great" (famous?) women in history is due to the structure of society and traditional roles, which have only recently been changing and equalising in terms of opportunity to be great/famous in the Western world. So in terms of greatness we really need to make a recent comparison, perhaps only the last 30 years in countries with roughly equal opportunities for both sexes. It would be interesting to see a study on this.
Men play to win.
Women play not to lose.
Since 80% of females reproduced, and 40% of men reproduced.
This manifests as men being over represented at extremes, in board rooms and prisons, in high net worth and homelessness.
Women on the other hand cluster in the center in safe, secure roles.
"It would be interesting to see a study on this."
It's been done. Contrary to expectations the more "equal" nations eg those in Scandinavia and the like lead to more traditional choices being made by the majority.
Still today, most inventions and great things are being done by men. Just see AI. In Iceland, 80% of engeneers are men. We have been imvewting in the wrong gender.