Undoubtedly yes. I'm increasingly convinced the elites' long game is to destroy their only opposition: groups of men. This is the only reason that makes sense for the current state of the West and the anti-male, anti-family policies that have been in effect for decades. The glaring contradiction is the increasing male suicide epidemic. MSM or politicians never talk about not to mention the Family Courts and Feminist "charities" 🤦♂️🤷♂️
In the last month with trouble in a queer group and over international men’s day and then some lesbian wanting only a ‘woman’s’ table at an event and people blowing up about that im convinced that many people - men, women etc etc are in such a habit of reacting without thinking what they are doing!!
Another example, in my world, a friend who pays to belong to ‘these queer groups ‘ admitted he doesn’t take notice of the newsletter nor the mobile group we have !!!
I didn’t ask him why but my own thinking is that he sees it as good business and hopefully he will benefit. Otherwise I see through this ‘solidarity’ call, more and more …,,,
My theory is pretty simple. We now have nukes, so we can't do war as we used to, which then creates a surplus of males of fighting age.
This then creates more issues:
How do we limit fighting-age males?
How do we kill them covertly?
These answers, IMHO, are obviously depopulation, attack the family by poisoning women to be like men and make laws and policies anti-male. Simples. These Hitler-types have children, family and friends. Their wealth passes down, but tactics change with technological development. They own most MSM and intelligence services, so it's easy to spin whatever narrative you want. It's just so blatantly obvious to most now because of podcasters and independent social media that they are now trying to shut down (Online Harms Bill).
I suspect the countries that do are now being used to "invade" peaceful, civilised societies such as the Five Eyes countries (the "West"). Causing anarchy, another socially constructivist feminist construct.
Why not get rid of women so that children cannot be born!!
Anyway, something is going on for sure and it certainly is the time for spinning many narratives that people are not able to really think through and reject them, even in their own minds.. I struggle somedays but I'm to nice sometimes too..
It's all so complicated and that is where I sometimes think, 'I cannot read or take anymore' and its not like my life is shit either...
But, also, as you say,,, things change.. I wonder if it is the end of something and 'they' are fighting like f*cking crazy to hang onto their old ways!!!!! Maybe that is the MSM...
I'm a bit allergic to the 'elite' because I was involved with friends in Sydney who talked about this a lot and in the end I was like, 'who are the elite'? and kind of got to a point where maybe the normal employee in some government office is carrying all this and implementing all this without realising what they are actually doing!!! Is that what you mean, kind of??
Like the female scientist who was working within a group and after the bomb was dropped on Japan she realised, on discussion with others, that she was used in one group to create only one part of the bomb and thus they were convinced that 'we need your work to stop the evil'.. The American woman that told me of this woman, said she retired to the Hills to lead a very normal life and not be involved in anything like that again!!!!
Well, according to science, women are far more agreeable than men (overall), and if you lie to them and make them behave like men, you don't need to genocide them; they're doing it by themselves! Men, on the other hand, aren't the best at emotional intelligence, so they blindly follow "law", and this is how the control and subjugation of men plays out—mostly in gynocentric populations.
There are many interesting books and articles, as DouglasEW mentions, the Frankfurt School is a very interesting read and is basically the list below. The one that made me realise was "Quiet Weapons for Silent Wars". I also did a lot of communist & feminist reading after being abused at uni (my 2nd time returning to uni) for telling a joke in a non-uni WhatsApp group!
The list:
Postcolonial theory (essentially slavery) is being used today to promote racism via blacks vs history (taught as white only, which we know is wrong).
Critical Race Theory - black vs white (using post-colonial theory as a background, as historical evidence which has been changed or selectively taught).
Queer theory - normal vs LGBTQIA+ (based on studies (CSA) of babies orgasms as young as 6 months "research" by Alfred Kinsey and a nazi paedophile whose name I forget, and of course Michel Foucault)
Feminisms and Gender Studies (initially women's studies) - Men vs Women (using gender roles as evidence taught as was forced by men)
Disability studies - disabled vs abled (I'd be oppressed as ASD & ADHD 😂)
Fat studies - overweight vs average weight
Intersectionality is used in all the above and ties them all together by claiming all theories can be intertwined. So, a fat, disabled black person has far less privilege, more oppression, etc.
They are now being misused as a privilege calculator to elevate or denigrate, virtue signal and silence people based on race, weight, sexual orientation and disabilities. I doubt there is any limit to misusing these theories. They should be used to investigate the qualitative experiences of these types of people, but they're being taken literally and misused to control and silence people by brainwashing them en masse.
The creation of hate offences (hurt feelings is now a crime).
Continual change to create confusion (immemorial).
The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children (current issue).
The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority (now mostly female, agreeable, brainwashed uni graduates 🤔).
Huge immigration to destroy identity (immemorial)
The promotion of excessive drinking (alcohol always gets a pass on budget day!)
Emptying of churches (immemorial).
An unreliable legal system with a bias against victims of crime (VAWG).
Dependency on the state or state benefits (Universal Basic Income (UBI)).
Control and dumbing down of media (immemorial).
Encouraging the breakdown of the family (since approx 1960, male suicide and the Children Act 1989).
The original list is:
The creation of racism offences.
Continual change to create confusion.
The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
Huge immigration to destroy identity.
The promotion of excessive drinking.
Emptying of churches.
An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
Dependency on the state or state benefits.
Control and dumbing down of media.
Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
Additional list:
Attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
Abolish differences in the education of boys and girls.
Abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces.
Declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’.
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks’.”
Damn! I thought I was at the bottom of the hole and now it's even deeper....
The one thing I did think after reading your comment was: Evil is involved.
So reading a little from your link: "Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. "
Yes, without any doubt, this is evil. They are destroying hope. Can't get a job, can't buy a house, can't buy a car... hopeless society or nihilistic, and we're back to addiction and suicide. What also woke me up was Paul Harvey's speech on Joe Rogan. It mirrors the list almost perfectly.
It is not just the West. The West invented it, though.
If you really want to burrow down the rabbit hole, I will mention the Frankfurt School, Antonio Gramsci ('Prison Notes'), and György (Georg) Lukác (1919, not the contemporary man by that name). After a few days, you will understand that there is nothing happening that is accidental, and nothing much new (the trans stuff being an exception).
The trans stuff is not the exception. It is part of breaking down humanity/humanism. It is now leading to transhumanism to remove God and Religion. Pretty soon you will have half human-half AI robots as superior beings. Humans will be relegated to shitpile as slaves.
The UN’s mischief on sexual matters goes far -– far – beyond all this. Focusing only on the overt bias against men, serious as that is, presents only a tiny part of the destruction. It is no exaggeration to say that sex and “gender” issues are the main preoccupation of the vast bulk of UN staff, and the UN serves as a major patronage machine for feminist employment. Their obsession with “gender equality and the empowerment of women” (their ubiquitous and contradictory phrase) involves them in fueling global poverty, ensuring that underdeveloped countries stay underdeveloped, indoctrinating children into feminist ideology, creating and exacerbating the global AIDS epidemic, undermining constructive “liberation” efforts of oppressed peoples, even encouraging war, and more. I spend over a hundred pages on this in my book, The New Politics of Sex (www.StephenBaskerville.com), and I quote numerous testimonies of scholars, journalists, and practitioners who have first-hand experience battling feminists at the UN.
More UN conferences have been devoted to “women” than any other topic. These conferences and other meetings are organized by feminist organizations, who draft the final document before the conference begins. Groups disapproved by feminists are inhibited and excluded from participation. Feminist groups participate sitting around the conference table while official UN ambassadors from poor countries (upholding traditional values) must stand against the wall. They hold multiple meetings simultaneously in different languages, so that poor countries, lacking the staff and translators, cannot participate.
UN “human rights” treaties like CEDAW and the Convention on the Rights of the Child are written and enforced by feminist groups. UN “human rights” agencies constantly push to make abortion a human right, despite the contrary wishes of most member states. They also push to make domestic violence a human rights violation, which will allow or force governments to treat men accused of domestic violence like dictators, removing their due process protections.
UNICEF is especially saturated with feminism. The agency some of us remember from the 1960s, with Danny Kaye selling Easter Seals, has become the directorate of global social work and viciously anti-male.
UN “development aid” goes entirely to women, making it global welfare with all the familiar consequences: eliminating fathers, preventing family formation, and trapping poor countries in the poverty and accompanying social ills that always result from widespread single motherhood.
UN-sponsored “sex education” programs do not just instruct children in how to have sex; they also indoctrinate them into feminist ideology.
UN AIDS programs made the AIDS epidemic far worse, especially among heterosexuals in places like Africa, by undermining effective abstinence programs and pushing condoms exclusively.
UN programs against “child soldiers” have zero impact, because they are undermined by UN ideology itself, which encourages children to rebel and break free from their parents and join gangs and militias.
UN programs on “human trafficking” encourage various destructive practices and augment government power. They make prostitution a crime for the men to buy (“sex trafficking”) but legal for the women to sell (“sex workers”).
The International Criminal Court, formally linked to the UN, spends most of its time prosecuting men for alleged sexual crimes.
The UN’s most basic role – ensuring global peace – is undermined by encouraging military intervention in places like Afghanistan to promote “gender equality”.
I could go on and on, and you will find much more in Part Four of my book, The New Politics of Sex (www.StephenBaskerville.com.
There is no specific day to help or even commemorate men/boys. We just get the bill.
While some UN observances may appear gender-neutral—or at least potentially inclusive of men—the reality is that their themes, campaigns, and promotional material overwhelmingly focus on women. This should surprise no one: the UN has explicitly declared itself a feminist organisation.
Several supposedly universal observance days follow this pattern. For example:
* International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict – presented almost entirely through the lens of female victimhood.
* International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggression – heavily skewed toward girls.
* International Equal Pay Day – routinely weaponised as a platform to promote misleading statistics that portray women as perennial victims of discrimination, ignoring occupational choice, hours worked, or personal agency.
* Even International Day of Peace often centres on "ending violence against women", and typically uses the occasion to vilify men—as peacefully as possible, of course—despite the awkward fact that female heads of state are statistically more likely to initiate conflict than male ones.
* International Day in Support of Victims of Torture might seem inclusive, but even there, the narrative often sidelines the male majority of victims.
* World Refugee Day is ostensibly for all, but in practice, the UN's messaging, funding, and imagery disproportionately favour women—and routinely ignore or even demonise male refugees, who are often the least supported and most maligned.
it disgusts me how women are spoiled and pampered even as feminists insist men are privileged, yet no one helps men, our problems are ignored and men are left with the worst and most dangerous jobs and responsibilities, there is no equality, its what feminists and simps want.
Time for an income tax strike and every man in the United States says "No" to paying income taxes. Even if they take it out of your paycheck, you can still claim 8 BILLION DEPENDENTS. Relevant caselaw on this: U.S. v. Snider, 502 F.2d 645 (4th Cir. 1972) claiming 3 BILLION DEPENDENTS on religious grounds/conscientious objectors to pay federal income taxes to fund unwarranted wars:
Court upheld couple claiming 3 billion exemptions on our W-4 form, "because we are becoming more and more aware of our responsibility to our 3 billion fellow human beings all over the world. The military establishment of this country threatens the peace and security of every person on earth. Our country's military is destroying life on a horrifying scale in Southeast Asia, and it threatens to expand this destruction to other areas of the globe. Our responsibility to our fellow men leads us to resist this military establishment by refusing to pay willingly any of our tax money to it. We cannot continue to contribute money to the death and destruction which our military wreaks in Southeast Asia or to the fear which it generates in people the world over."
"We also refuse to pay our taxes willingly to the U.S. Government on the ground that we are conscientiously opposed to any and all wars. We have a strong Christian faith which is the basis of our opposition to war and violence among men. We are conscientiously opposed to the use of violence to settle conflicts and we are committed to removing the causes of violent conflict. We cannot in good conscience support a government which devotes over 60 percent of its resources [648] to war. We must work to change the priorities of that government and its people. As one of the most powerful military nations on earth, we must start leading the world toward peace."
Let's say that David Pimintel of Greenpeace was correct in saying that a world without fossil fuels can support only four people for every acre of arable land. This would necessitate a managed transition to a greatly reduced population, without panic, and without obvious imposition of birth control.
Step right up feminism, with 'Gender Studies' courses as the vanguard. Impressionable young women can be indoctrinated with the views of Sally Miller Gearhart and Mary Daly, who wished to reduce the male population to 10% of the total.
Meanwhile, the WEF types are investing heavily in renewables, often using the taxpayer base to subsidise.
And the investment community are arranging wealth to be transferred from men to women, who are more likely to agree with the consequences of climate change. ("The children!! Think of the children!!"). The 'Increase in Women's Wealth' of the link says it all.
These vested interests are hidden behind a mask of moral imperative by the UN. Feminists are probably being played, but don't realise it. Or there may be something even more Machiavellian going on, along the Gearhart lines, but I don't want to think about which side has the better end game.
Meanwhile, the fossil fuel wars have already begun. The EU attempted to beckon Georgia and Ukraine into the club, but Putin drew a line in the sand. And Trump doesn't see why the US should defend EU energy interests. He has his eye on Venezuela.
Meanwhile, the advanced semiconductors require for EVs are 90% made in Taiwan.
Beware that, for the past twenty years, the west hasn't been preparing some 'bare branches' of its own, for any coming conflict. Again, Ms Gearhart would be so content with the probable outcome.
The only problem with managed populations, is that the population will become extinct after 4-5 generations. If the Elitists are trying to reduce the human population to 500 MILLION, you can expect that within 200-500 years after that, the human race will cease to exist.
17,000 participants, 6,000 government delegates at the 'negotiations', over 4,000 NGOs, and 4,000 media reps to 'spread the message', the Fourth World Conference on Women held by the UN in Beijing, thirty years ago, looks like the beginning of a significant operation...
One has to ask ‘what are all these NGO’s (so called charities avoiding tax) actually doing?’
They are like an Occult Secret Society thinking they will save the world from the scourge of Humanity. Their very action is an abomination against ‘God, Nature, Spiritual Beings’ - or whatever you want to call ‘it’. In that they cannot let Humans get on with it all without them controlling things!!
I’m also shocked to remember that someone I know has behind the scenes access to all the big platforms so they can be analysed in order to see what Society is doing!!
Maybe they know I’m hanging around on this substack !!!
The weird thing is that I still arrive at the ‘and then what? What happens at the end ?’
In reality my opinion is only my opinion and at worse it is my Ego out of control in a Materialistic world! A world that currently forces people to to pay taxes to be used in areas without our actually voting for where our money should go!! Ayn Rand was correct when she mentions something ‘my money (so called forced taxes) should not be supporting anyone that is my enemy!’
Even Communist Russia didn’t manage to destroy, totally, some peoples need to believe in a force that is greater than themselves.
I cannot prove that God exists and no one can prove that God doesn’t exist!!
Despite my horror at all this I can only hope that everything is getting hotter before a big change happens!!!
Yes. You can go back much further - to wealthy women in the late 19th century and the eventual influence upon the League of Nations that was later taken over by the UN - to understand HOW the Beijing Conference came into being but it was that one conference that made a step change in what the UN is about. Some of those discussions are an interesting read but, as with most conferences, it was the backroom deals (labelled as 'understandings') that did a lot of the damaging work (and some good: most of these people were not evil).
There is much truth to this. Even in truly misogynistic societies like Afghanistan, male children and men are also subjected to campaigns of rape and brutality...but no interference with THAT cultural practice is allowed. (American military who intervened on behalf of such rape victims were disciplined for not respecting the local culture.)
That culture has reached our shores. You cannot denigrate Muslims/Islamists (which in reality is one in the same). They have their own communities (Dearborn, MI for one; Minneapolis for another), "no-go" zones, mosques, etc. Police won't even intervene in Muslim/Islamist matters and are told to stay out of their communities. Since taxpayers are footing the bill for these communities as an overall tax (whether property taxes, income taxes, sales taxes, etc., or all taxes), Americans have the right to determine whether or not to maintain these communities. When real Americans wake up they will move to eliminate these communities (like the Somali crime syndicate community in Minneapolis and elsewhere), there will be an existential push to look at feminism as well.
Agreed. I am based in Minnesota and have seen how the Walz administration panders to Islamist activity...even when it results in the disappearance of Muslim's "second wives" literally 5 houses away from the Walz family home back when he was in congress and the family lived in Mankato. Walz and his team had refused to meet with citizens raising concerns about Islamic criminal activity in Minnesota the month before the Somali bin Stabbing incident at the mall in St. Cloud in 2016 in which a Somali "security guard" approached people in the mall and stabbed anyone who did not respond by saying they were Muslim. I called Walz's chief of staff and asked what it would take for Walz to take Islamist activity seriously, a dead body in his front yard? I pointed out that a Muslim man was abusing his wife under Sharia law lived 5 houses away from his own family home with the situation known in the neigborhood! Two years later, the second "wife" of the same Pakistani Muslim student disappeared. The man had been trespassed from the local university campus for his violent threats, and is now subject to an international warrant for his arrest. The second wife's body was never found.
As weird as it sounds, perhaps allowing the Islamist to do their thing will stop the feminist axis.
Some of the Islamic men take punishing their women under sharia law to excess and that is not a good thing, however many many years ago in the west men were allowed to punish their wives too. The idea is not alien to the west.
Equally women accused by the state could say that their husbands made them do it and the husband was punished. The husband was responsible for the conduct of his wife.
Sadly, both young girls AND boys are traded as sex slaves in some parts of the world. No one should ever be treated that way. Similarly, no person should be wantonly murdered in the womb for the convenience of an person who can't keep her legs together which is why a truly just and equal world would make elective abortion a death penalty offense for those who engage in it.
SADLY IS STILL NOT BALLANCED. KARMA MUST NE NALLANCED. I AM JAPPY FOR MALES NEING RAPED. AND NOYS. WE NEED ONLY BOYS AND MALES BEING RAOED. DID YOU NOTICE CUNT THAT MY GENDER IS “IN PRISTITITE LOOK” ? MY GENDER! IS IN BROTHELS! STFU ABOUT “BOTH ARE SEXUALIZED EQUALLY”
Thanks Tom. One of the talks at the 2021 International Conference on Men's Issues, by Douglas Wallace, was titled, "“Men’s Rights Issues Need to be Addressed at the Global Level”. Plenty on the United Nations, going back many decades.
Thanks, Tom. I know I can find it hard to get across to people around the world just how much they are, in reality, governed by interest groups in the UN, and how feminist it is in practice and intent.
The small international MRM, working with others in the field, has achieved some successes.
One is that, by UN official standards, gender=sex and there are just two of them.
Another is to block abortion as being a stated human right. Even for many who support abortion this can be important when they realise that abortion in UN circles often includes what is called "post-birth abortion" - without any particular limitation on just how long after birth a child can be 'aborted'.
Yes. But (1) That sort of thing has been tried, even since the UN declared itself a feminist body; and (2) Who do you want to send an email to, in the world's largest intergovernmental organisation? The UN isn’t one place with a single inbox – it’s 193 countries and dozens of separate agencies that each split into dozens more, so there’s no 'UN' to just email.
I've never had a reply from the UN when I've complained and you are 100% correct in 'which email address do I send it to?'
I had a secret desire that all of Tom's followers (and more) would send an email complaining of this bias and the email boxes would be overflowing with complaints and they would change their minds and stop the bias........ I think it was a dream!!
I often think ‘women themselves are the biggest promoters of Gynocentrism’.
Or has Tom being saying that all along?
It seems to me that the females assist ‘ideologically at least’ other women more than men seem to…. Even, some, of those women that change their bodies so they don’t look like women still posts feminist stuff!!
Maybe I’m naive, but until we stop ‘forcing’ (think of Ayn Rands use of this word) others to do what we want and see how harmful it is then we will continue along this torturous road…
Undoubtedly yes. I'm increasingly convinced the elites' long game is to destroy their only opposition: groups of men. This is the only reason that makes sense for the current state of the West and the anti-male, anti-family policies that have been in effect for decades. The glaring contradiction is the increasing male suicide epidemic. MSM or politicians never talk about not to mention the Family Courts and Feminist "charities" 🤦♂️🤷♂️
I stopped giving to charities and even the ‘queer’ ones because I’ve researched and once I see lesbian or feminist mentioned , I’m out of it.
And I’m a gay man who sees ‘we need community’ in all our newsletters.
But where does the money actually go is my thought.
Example. Movember
But why ?
Why are men the problem ?
I don’t get it. What am I missing ?
I’m sorry but !!!
Who are these Elites?
In the last month with trouble in a queer group and over international men’s day and then some lesbian wanting only a ‘woman’s’ table at an event and people blowing up about that im convinced that many people - men, women etc etc are in such a habit of reacting without thinking what they are doing!!
Another example, in my world, a friend who pays to belong to ‘these queer groups ‘ admitted he doesn’t take notice of the newsletter nor the mobile group we have !!!
I didn’t ask him why but my own thinking is that he sees it as good business and hopefully he will benefit. Otherwise I see through this ‘solidarity’ call, more and more …,,,
My theory is pretty simple. We now have nukes, so we can't do war as we used to, which then creates a surplus of males of fighting age.
This then creates more issues:
How do we limit fighting-age males?
How do we kill them covertly?
These answers, IMHO, are obviously depopulation, attack the family by poisoning women to be like men and make laws and policies anti-male. Simples. These Hitler-types have children, family and friends. Their wealth passes down, but tactics change with technological development. They own most MSM and intelligence services, so it's easy to spin whatever narrative you want. It's just so blatantly obvious to most now because of podcasters and independent social media that they are now trying to shut down (Online Harms Bill).
A surplus of fighting-age males certainly gets some feminist advisors to Government all hot around the collar.
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/
https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827/
I suspect the countries that do are now being used to "invade" peaceful, civilised societies such as the Five Eyes countries (the "West"). Causing anarchy, another socially constructivist feminist construct.
Phew.. that's a bit much for me..
Why not get rid of women so that children cannot be born!!
Anyway, something is going on for sure and it certainly is the time for spinning many narratives that people are not able to really think through and reject them, even in their own minds.. I struggle somedays but I'm to nice sometimes too..
It's all so complicated and that is where I sometimes think, 'I cannot read or take anymore' and its not like my life is shit either...
But, also, as you say,,, things change.. I wonder if it is the end of something and 'they' are fighting like f*cking crazy to hang onto their old ways!!!!! Maybe that is the MSM...
I'm a bit allergic to the 'elite' because I was involved with friends in Sydney who talked about this a lot and in the end I was like, 'who are the elite'? and kind of got to a point where maybe the normal employee in some government office is carrying all this and implementing all this without realising what they are actually doing!!! Is that what you mean, kind of??
Like the female scientist who was working within a group and after the bomb was dropped on Japan she realised, on discussion with others, that she was used in one group to create only one part of the bomb and thus they were convinced that 'we need your work to stop the evil'.. The American woman that told me of this woman, said she retired to the Hills to lead a very normal life and not be involved in anything like that again!!!!
Well, according to science, women are far more agreeable than men (overall), and if you lie to them and make them behave like men, you don't need to genocide them; they're doing it by themselves! Men, on the other hand, aren't the best at emotional intelligence, so they blindly follow "law", and this is how the control and subjugation of men plays out—mostly in gynocentric populations.
There are many interesting books and articles, as DouglasEW mentions, the Frankfurt School is a very interesting read and is basically the list below. The one that made me realise was "Quiet Weapons for Silent Wars". I also did a lot of communist & feminist reading after being abused at uni (my 2nd time returning to uni) for telling a joke in a non-uni WhatsApp group!
The list:
Postcolonial theory (essentially slavery) is being used today to promote racism via blacks vs history (taught as white only, which we know is wrong).
Critical Race Theory - black vs white (using post-colonial theory as a background, as historical evidence which has been changed or selectively taught).
Queer theory - normal vs LGBTQIA+ (based on studies (CSA) of babies orgasms as young as 6 months "research" by Alfred Kinsey and a nazi paedophile whose name I forget, and of course Michel Foucault)
Feminisms and Gender Studies (initially women's studies) - Men vs Women (using gender roles as evidence taught as was forced by men)
Disability studies - disabled vs abled (I'd be oppressed as ASD & ADHD 😂)
Fat studies - overweight vs average weight
Intersectionality is used in all the above and ties them all together by claiming all theories can be intertwined. So, a fat, disabled black person has far less privilege, more oppression, etc.
They are now being misused as a privilege calculator to elevate or denigrate, virtue signal and silence people based on race, weight, sexual orientation and disabilities. I doubt there is any limit to misusing these theories. They should be used to investigate the qualitative experiences of these types of people, but they're being taken literally and misused to control and silence people by brainwashing them en masse.
The creation of hate offences (hurt feelings is now a crime).
Continual change to create confusion (immemorial).
The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children (current issue).
The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority (now mostly female, agreeable, brainwashed uni graduates 🤔).
Huge immigration to destroy identity (immemorial)
The promotion of excessive drinking (alcohol always gets a pass on budget day!)
Emptying of churches (immemorial).
An unreliable legal system with a bias against victims of crime (VAWG).
Dependency on the state or state benefits (Universal Basic Income (UBI)).
Control and dumbing down of media (immemorial).
Encouraging the breakdown of the family (since approx 1960, male suicide and the Children Act 1989).
The original list is:
The creation of racism offences.
Continual change to create confusion.
The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
Huge immigration to destroy identity.
The promotion of excessive drinking.
Emptying of churches.
An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
Dependency on the state or state benefits.
Control and dumbing down of media.
Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
Additional list:
Attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
Abolish differences in the education of boys and girls.
Abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces.
Declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’.
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks’.”
For reference:
National Association of Catholic Families
https://www.cfnews.org.uk/frankfurt-school/
I'll let you determine where the West is a the moment.
Damn! I thought I was at the bottom of the hole and now it's even deeper....
The one thing I did think after reading your comment was: Evil is involved.
So reading a little from your link: "Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. "
Evil.
Yes, without any doubt, this is evil. They are destroying hope. Can't get a job, can't buy a house, can't buy a car... hopeless society or nihilistic, and we're back to addiction and suicide. What also woke me up was Paul Harvey's speech on Joe Rogan. It mirrors the list almost perfectly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnPE8u5ONls
It is not just the West. The West invented it, though.
If you really want to burrow down the rabbit hole, I will mention the Frankfurt School, Antonio Gramsci ('Prison Notes'), and György (Georg) Lukác (1919, not the contemporary man by that name). After a few days, you will understand that there is nothing happening that is accidental, and nothing much new (the trans stuff being an exception).
The trans stuff is not the exception. It is part of breaking down humanity/humanism. It is now leading to transhumanism to remove God and Religion. Pretty soon you will have half human-half AI robots as superior beings. Humans will be relegated to shitpile as slaves.
In general objectives, I agree that pretending that there are more than two sexes is in keeping with cultural Marxist plotting.
All I meant to convey is that it is a new invention in terms of it not being specifically thought of, planned and documented over seventy years ago..
I read the UN’s recent Social Media push on this. It’s clear Misandry disguised as Care.
Tom et al.,
The UN’s mischief on sexual matters goes far -– far – beyond all this. Focusing only on the overt bias against men, serious as that is, presents only a tiny part of the destruction. It is no exaggeration to say that sex and “gender” issues are the main preoccupation of the vast bulk of UN staff, and the UN serves as a major patronage machine for feminist employment. Their obsession with “gender equality and the empowerment of women” (their ubiquitous and contradictory phrase) involves them in fueling global poverty, ensuring that underdeveloped countries stay underdeveloped, indoctrinating children into feminist ideology, creating and exacerbating the global AIDS epidemic, undermining constructive “liberation” efforts of oppressed peoples, even encouraging war, and more. I spend over a hundred pages on this in my book, The New Politics of Sex (www.StephenBaskerville.com), and I quote numerous testimonies of scholars, journalists, and practitioners who have first-hand experience battling feminists at the UN.
More UN conferences have been devoted to “women” than any other topic. These conferences and other meetings are organized by feminist organizations, who draft the final document before the conference begins. Groups disapproved by feminists are inhibited and excluded from participation. Feminist groups participate sitting around the conference table while official UN ambassadors from poor countries (upholding traditional values) must stand against the wall. They hold multiple meetings simultaneously in different languages, so that poor countries, lacking the staff and translators, cannot participate.
UN “human rights” treaties like CEDAW and the Convention on the Rights of the Child are written and enforced by feminist groups. UN “human rights” agencies constantly push to make abortion a human right, despite the contrary wishes of most member states. They also push to make domestic violence a human rights violation, which will allow or force governments to treat men accused of domestic violence like dictators, removing their due process protections.
UNICEF is especially saturated with feminism. The agency some of us remember from the 1960s, with Danny Kaye selling Easter Seals, has become the directorate of global social work and viciously anti-male.
UN “development aid” goes entirely to women, making it global welfare with all the familiar consequences: eliminating fathers, preventing family formation, and trapping poor countries in the poverty and accompanying social ills that always result from widespread single motherhood.
UN-sponsored “sex education” programs do not just instruct children in how to have sex; they also indoctrinate them into feminist ideology.
UN AIDS programs made the AIDS epidemic far worse, especially among heterosexuals in places like Africa, by undermining effective abstinence programs and pushing condoms exclusively.
UN programs against “child soldiers” have zero impact, because they are undermined by UN ideology itself, which encourages children to rebel and break free from their parents and join gangs and militias.
UN programs on “human trafficking” encourage various destructive practices and augment government power. They make prostitution a crime for the men to buy (“sex trafficking”) but legal for the women to sell (“sex workers”).
The International Criminal Court, formally linked to the UN, spends most of its time prosecuting men for alleged sexual crimes.
The UN’s most basic role – ensuring global peace – is undermined by encouraging military intervention in places like Afghanistan to promote “gender equality”.
I could go on and on, and you will find much more in Part Four of my book, The New Politics of Sex (www.StephenBaskerville.com.
Great comment, and I'm keen to read your book—The New Politics of Sex. Thank you Stephen.
Gynocentric feminist UN - 8 days for females and 0 for males!
International Day of;
*0 Tolerance to FGM (none for MGM)
*Women/Girls in Science
*Women’s Day
*Girls in ICT Day
*Widows’ Day
*Girl Child
*Rural Women
*Elimination of Violence against Women (none for violence against men)
There are more for women/girls that you have missed. They keep being added to, as well.
https://jameslnuzzo.substack.com/p/united-nations-days-of-observance
There is no specific day to help or even commemorate men/boys. We just get the bill.
While some UN observances may appear gender-neutral—or at least potentially inclusive of men—the reality is that their themes, campaigns, and promotional material overwhelmingly focus on women. This should surprise no one: the UN has explicitly declared itself a feminist organisation.
Several supposedly universal observance days follow this pattern. For example:
* International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict – presented almost entirely through the lens of female victimhood.
* International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggression – heavily skewed toward girls.
* International Equal Pay Day – routinely weaponised as a platform to promote misleading statistics that portray women as perennial victims of discrimination, ignoring occupational choice, hours worked, or personal agency.
* Even International Day of Peace often centres on "ending violence against women", and typically uses the occasion to vilify men—as peacefully as possible, of course—despite the awkward fact that female heads of state are statistically more likely to initiate conflict than male ones.
* International Day in Support of Victims of Torture might seem inclusive, but even there, the narrative often sidelines the male majority of victims.
* World Refugee Day is ostensibly for all, but in practice, the UN's messaging, funding, and imagery disproportionately favour women—and routinely ignore or even demonise male refugees, who are often the least supported and most maligned.
it disgusts me how women are spoiled and pampered even as feminists insist men are privileged, yet no one helps men, our problems are ignored and men are left with the worst and most dangerous jobs and responsibilities, there is no equality, its what feminists and simps want.
Time for an income tax strike and every man in the United States says "No" to paying income taxes. Even if they take it out of your paycheck, you can still claim 8 BILLION DEPENDENTS. Relevant caselaw on this: U.S. v. Snider, 502 F.2d 645 (4th Cir. 1972) claiming 3 BILLION DEPENDENTS on religious grounds/conscientious objectors to pay federal income taxes to fund unwarranted wars:
Court upheld couple claiming 3 billion exemptions on our W-4 form, "because we are becoming more and more aware of our responsibility to our 3 billion fellow human beings all over the world. The military establishment of this country threatens the peace and security of every person on earth. Our country's military is destroying life on a horrifying scale in Southeast Asia, and it threatens to expand this destruction to other areas of the globe. Our responsibility to our fellow men leads us to resist this military establishment by refusing to pay willingly any of our tax money to it. We cannot continue to contribute money to the death and destruction which our military wreaks in Southeast Asia or to the fear which it generates in people the world over."
"We also refuse to pay our taxes willingly to the U.S. Government on the ground that we are conscientiously opposed to any and all wars. We have a strong Christian faith which is the basis of our opposition to war and violence among men. We are conscientiously opposed to the use of violence to settle conflicts and we are committed to removing the causes of violent conflict. We cannot in good conscience support a government which devotes over 60 percent of its resources [648] to war. We must work to change the priorities of that government and its people. As one of the most powerful military nations on earth, we must start leading the world toward peace."
Let's say that David Pimintel of Greenpeace was correct in saying that a world without fossil fuels can support only four people for every acre of arable land. This would necessitate a managed transition to a greatly reduced population, without panic, and without obvious imposition of birth control.
Step right up feminism, with 'Gender Studies' courses as the vanguard. Impressionable young women can be indoctrinated with the views of Sally Miller Gearhart and Mary Daly, who wished to reduce the male population to 10% of the total.
Meanwhile, the WEF types are investing heavily in renewables, often using the taxpayer base to subsidise.
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/yellen-says-3-trillion-needed-annually-climate-financing-far-more-than-current-2024-07-27/
And the investment community are arranging wealth to be transferred from men to women, who are more likely to agree with the consequences of climate change. ("The children!! Think of the children!!"). The 'Increase in Women's Wealth' of the link says it all.
https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens
These vested interests are hidden behind a mask of moral imperative by the UN. Feminists are probably being played, but don't realise it. Or there may be something even more Machiavellian going on, along the Gearhart lines, but I don't want to think about which side has the better end game.
Meanwhile, the fossil fuel wars have already begun. The EU attempted to beckon Georgia and Ukraine into the club, but Putin drew a line in the sand. And Trump doesn't see why the US should defend EU energy interests. He has his eye on Venezuela.
Meanwhile, the advanced semiconductors require for EVs are 90% made in Taiwan.
Beware that, for the past twenty years, the west hasn't been preparing some 'bare branches' of its own, for any coming conflict. Again, Ms Gearhart would be so content with the probable outcome.
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/
If anyone is interested, have attempted to pull it all together in a book with nearly 200 references. And, thanks to Mike Buchanan, the pdf is free.
https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/240904-ms-patterning.pdf
The only problem with managed populations, is that the population will become extinct after 4-5 generations. If the Elitists are trying to reduce the human population to 500 MILLION, you can expect that within 200-500 years after that, the human race will cease to exist.
Yes, this is what I don't understand. When all the objectives are achieved, where to from there?
This is my question too!!
17,000 participants, 6,000 government delegates at the 'negotiations', over 4,000 NGOs, and 4,000 media reps to 'spread the message', the Fourth World Conference on Women held by the UN in Beijing, thirty years ago, looks like the beginning of a significant operation...
https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995
One has to ask ‘what are all these NGO’s (so called charities avoiding tax) actually doing?’
They are like an Occult Secret Society thinking they will save the world from the scourge of Humanity. Their very action is an abomination against ‘God, Nature, Spiritual Beings’ - or whatever you want to call ‘it’. In that they cannot let Humans get on with it all without them controlling things!!
I’m also shocked to remember that someone I know has behind the scenes access to all the big platforms so they can be analysed in order to see what Society is doing!!
Maybe they know I’m hanging around on this substack !!!
The weird thing is that I still arrive at the ‘and then what? What happens at the end ?’
In reality my opinion is only my opinion and at worse it is my Ego out of control in a Materialistic world! A world that currently forces people to to pay taxes to be used in areas without our actually voting for where our money should go!! Ayn Rand was correct when she mentions something ‘my money (so called forced taxes) should not be supporting anyone that is my enemy!’
Even Communist Russia didn’t manage to destroy, totally, some peoples need to believe in a force that is greater than themselves.
I cannot prove that God exists and no one can prove that God doesn’t exist!!
Despite my horror at all this I can only hope that everything is getting hotter before a big change happens!!!
**made some edits to typos...
Yes. You can go back much further - to wealthy women in the late 19th century and the eventual influence upon the League of Nations that was later taken over by the UN - to understand HOW the Beijing Conference came into being but it was that one conference that made a step change in what the UN is about. Some of those discussions are an interesting read but, as with most conferences, it was the backroom deals (labelled as 'understandings') that did a lot of the damaging work (and some good: most of these people were not evil).
There is much truth to this. Even in truly misogynistic societies like Afghanistan, male children and men are also subjected to campaigns of rape and brutality...but no interference with THAT cultural practice is allowed. (American military who intervened on behalf of such rape victims were disciplined for not respecting the local culture.)
https://www.smh.com.au/world/we-can-hear-them-screaming-soldiers-told-to-ignore-paedophilia-by-afghan-allies-20150921-gjr283.html
https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3328&context=parameters
That culture has reached our shores. You cannot denigrate Muslims/Islamists (which in reality is one in the same). They have their own communities (Dearborn, MI for one; Minneapolis for another), "no-go" zones, mosques, etc. Police won't even intervene in Muslim/Islamist matters and are told to stay out of their communities. Since taxpayers are footing the bill for these communities as an overall tax (whether property taxes, income taxes, sales taxes, etc., or all taxes), Americans have the right to determine whether or not to maintain these communities. When real Americans wake up they will move to eliminate these communities (like the Somali crime syndicate community in Minneapolis and elsewhere), there will be an existential push to look at feminism as well.
Agreed. I am based in Minnesota and have seen how the Walz administration panders to Islamist activity...even when it results in the disappearance of Muslim's "second wives" literally 5 houses away from the Walz family home back when he was in congress and the family lived in Mankato. Walz and his team had refused to meet with citizens raising concerns about Islamic criminal activity in Minnesota the month before the Somali bin Stabbing incident at the mall in St. Cloud in 2016 in which a Somali "security guard" approached people in the mall and stabbed anyone who did not respond by saying they were Muslim. I called Walz's chief of staff and asked what it would take for Walz to take Islamist activity seriously, a dead body in his front yard? I pointed out that a Muslim man was abusing his wife under Sharia law lived 5 houses away from his own family home with the situation known in the neigborhood! Two years later, the second "wife" of the same Pakistani Muslim student disappeared. The man had been trespassed from the local university campus for his violent threats, and is now subject to an international warrant for his arrest. The second wife's body was never found.
As weird as it sounds, perhaps allowing the Islamist to do their thing will stop the feminist axis.
Some of the Islamic men take punishing their women under sharia law to excess and that is not a good thing, however many many years ago in the west men were allowed to punish their wives too. The idea is not alien to the west.
Equally women accused by the state could say that their husbands made them do it and the husband was punished. The husband was responsible for the conduct of his wife.
YOU NEED TO BE PUT IN BROTHELS AS SEX SLAVES TO SEE WHAT EQUALITY REALLY MEANS!
Sadly, both young girls AND boys are traded as sex slaves in some parts of the world. No one should ever be treated that way. Similarly, no person should be wantonly murdered in the womb for the convenience of an person who can't keep her legs together which is why a truly just and equal world would make elective abortion a death penalty offense for those who engage in it.
We see the true nature of feminists with the posts you see below.
I WILL PORNIFY ONLYALE GENDER IN 2026 AND YPU WILL HELP! ALL OF YOU WILL HELP TO PORNIFY MALE GENDER IN 2026
SADLY IS STILL NOT BALLANCED. KARMA MUST NE NALLANCED. I AM JAPPY FOR MALES NEING RAPED. AND NOYS. WE NEED ONLY BOYS AND MALES BEING RAOED. DID YOU NOTICE CUNT THAT MY GENDER IS “IN PRISTITITE LOOK” ? MY GENDER! IS IN BROTHELS! STFU ABOUT “BOTH ARE SEXUALIZED EQUALLY”
MALES CANT KEEP THEIR LEGS YOGETHER!
Thanks Tom. One of the talks at the 2021 International Conference on Men's Issues, by Douglas Wallace, was titled, "“Men’s Rights Issues Need to be Addressed at the Global Level”. Plenty on the United Nations, going back many decades.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5z2WRIeC34
JUSTICE FOR MEN & BOYS
CAMPAIGN FOR MERIT IN BUSINESS
LAUGHING AT FEMINISTS
Absolutely!
The UN is nothing but a gynocentric feminist organization with the UN WOMEN organization directing far too much of the UN's policies and efforts.
This is how the gynocentric, feminist, sexist UN WOMEN and the UN celebrates International Men's Day
World Toilet Day
19 November
https://www.un.org/en/observances/toilet-day/background
Well said. Great article... This overt sexism is deeply corrosive for our societies.
Masculinity is FAKE CINSTRUCT..
Thanks, Tom. I know I can find it hard to get across to people around the world just how much they are, in reality, governed by interest groups in the UN, and how feminist it is in practice and intent.
The small international MRM, working with others in the field, has achieved some successes.
One is that, by UN official standards, gender=sex and there are just two of them.
Another is to block abortion as being a stated human right. Even for many who support abortion this can be important when they realise that abortion in UN circles often includes what is called "post-birth abortion" - without any particular limitation on just how long after birth a child can be 'aborted'.
Can’t we get an email going and send them in unison to a/multiple email contact at the UN 🤷♂️
Yes. But (1) That sort of thing has been tried, even since the UN declared itself a feminist body; and (2) Who do you want to send an email to, in the world's largest intergovernmental organisation? The UN isn’t one place with a single inbox – it’s 193 countries and dozens of separate agencies that each split into dozens more, so there’s no 'UN' to just email.
I've never had a reply from the UN when I've complained and you are 100% correct in 'which email address do I send it to?'
I had a secret desire that all of Tom's followers (and more) would send an email complaining of this bias and the email boxes would be overflowing with complaints and they would change their minds and stop the bias........ I think it was a dream!!
I often think ‘women themselves are the biggest promoters of Gynocentrism’.
Or has Tom being saying that all along?
It seems to me that the females assist ‘ideologically at least’ other women more than men seem to…. Even, some, of those women that change their bodies so they don’t look like women still posts feminist stuff!!
Maybe I’m naive, but until we stop ‘forcing’ (think of Ayn Rands use of this word) others to do what we want and see how harmful it is then we will continue along this torturous road…