Men have always had to “tough it out”; this goes back to our “Hunting and Gathering” Period. Going forth, into the Ice Age cold to bring home a Mastodon, or a Saber-Toothed Squirrel, requited no-holds-barred wherewithal.
The problem is, that we are not simple creatures at all; we just did what needed to be done. Through the “advancement” of the Human Race, we began to realize the value
of our contribution, and risk, only to have it
undermined at a critical time of intellectual development: “First Wave Feminism” arrives.
Flash Forward to 1975. The ballyhooed “Second
Wave”. of the Feminist Movement is about to be fully “mainstreamed”. A new book, opened to more fanfare than it deserved, was released:
“AGAINST OUR WILL: Men, Women, And Sexual Violence” promoted the idea that every man was a potential Predator. It’s kind of difficult to
convince Society that Men are worthy of care,
when we are reduced to the sub-human.
There is a newly released Book:
“TILTING AT WINDMILLS: An Ostensible Diversity”, Which goes into this subject. While the organization has notable shortcomings, it offers a fun to read,hard hitting view.
We have seen the progressive degeneration of concern for Men’s emotional wellbeing long enough. A total revamping is ling overdue.
It's bizarre how you've taken great offense to a book against sexual violence. Are you big mad about rape kit reform & the testing of hundreds of thousands of backlogged rape kits? Are you mad that one of first wave feminism's goals was to raise the age of consent from 12 to 16?
Yes! Meaning arises only from interpretation. The determination not to see is as important as what is seen.
Many who style themselves researchers become apologists and polemicists when the data speaks in ways that depart from the prevailing narrative -- and there are forces of considerable power arrayed to "keep them in line."
I believe gamma bias is real as we see it in other culturally biased instances. Example: Black Deaths Matter when a white police officer is involved regardless of circumstances but the far, far, far greater numbers of intraracial deaths in the black community get ignored. Apparently black lives only matter when the blame can be assigned outside the black community....but I digress.
The problem with gynocentrism is that hostility to boys and men is actually the goal as a means elevating women. Even when the harms visited upon boys and men are revealed any action that might mean drawing attention and resources away from women, let alone require women to take responsibility for harm THEY are causing, will be met with violent disapproval. There is really no way to avoid the conclusion that relational hostility is the core and goal of feminism and women as a group have whole heartedly embraced it. This requires a response that needs must impact ALL women.
Interesting point that diminishing men raised up women and girls. And given gynocentrism it was just so easy to do and got such a positive response it just got addictive.
A lot of men's problems are caused by Feminism, it was feminism that caused boys to fail thier schooling, Feminists use tactics against boys to make them fail , they don't want equality and for the same reason they have got divorce courts biased against fathers, they leave men to do very dangerous work yet complain there is inequality with pay, Feminists say men are privileged but they were saying that when millions of men were being killed and injured in the great war , if women want equality why wont they demand to be treated exactly the same as men, the answer is that feminists are liars, sexists and misandrist hypocrites.
Reframing is the intellectual counterpart of the pressure flip.
Gynocrats perform gymnastics when corrupting principles, like the unconstitutional family courts which routinely overrule higher courts. The judges simply decline to hear cases appealing and recluse themselves indefinitely.
It causes great suffering to men who internalize morality based on justice and the reality principle.
But the highest logos walks on water and defeats their sleight of hand with based truth, applying the trivium like a flaming sword.
During my most crushing failures and depressions I have sought humor, just as a father jokes with his children to reframe their challenges along their road to adult transcendence of them.
When you're in the middle of the ocean forced away from the old shore and hearing towards the far, it's the death of the soul, but you learn to breath underwater.
Semiotics will allow us to decrypt the gynofascist tyranny.
The psychology of woman won't remain secret in the face of trillions of videos, pictures, and transcripts.
We'll rebuild from first principles.
There'll be a vast museum of misandry as part of the truth and reconciliation process.
If women can't play their part, they're purging rebellion from the gene pool.
Look, when you live in a world where “kill all men” is an actual common thing, then yeah…. you aren’t oppressed, you are the oppressor.
Do you really think that kneecapping an entire gen z dating pool from entry to higher education and job entry is going to end well for you?
What you have created is a generation of gen z women who will hit 35 and be left with the reality of what sexism/feminism really leaves them with. Guess what ladies, your dating pool has evaporated ( and you are to blame ) now you will be expected to be Mommy-hags, taking care of you SAHB who plays x-box all day and orders door dash on your credit card.
Men would benefit greatly in a world in which equality between women and men was understood and valued. We don't live in that world. We live in a world that values equity instead. Men are understood to have a head start, a built-in advantage. In order to bring women up to that level, we have to give them more consideration, attention, assistance, support, etc. Equity inevitably maximizes women's problems and minimizes men's problems. The unwritten rule is that if there is something wrong with women, it is men's fault; and if there is something wrong with men (men are suffering), that is also men's fault. In a world that valued equality, men would get more assistance. As a majority in many ways, women have all the benefits of being seen as the minority. As a minority in many ways, men have no benefits but instead carry the burden of being seen as the majority. This is how discrimination is, by feminists, seen as social justice.
The problem begins with women being the majority of the electorate. Politicians of whatever flavour then prioritize female concerns as vote winners. The main female concerns are access to resources, and unfettered reproductive rights. Therefore, the job market must be skewed to her benefit (AA,EEO, DEI, ESG) and she must be able to dissolve marriage to her benefit, through 'no-fault' divorce. It must be framed that women have suffered historical grievous disadvantage in these institutions. The narrative must be one of constant oppression of female sainthood by a remorseless Patriarchy. Any deviation from this Grim Fairy Tale will now be ruthlessly suppressed.
For the past seventy years or so, a succession of male politicians have nailed their colours to the feminist mast, and acted as sock puppets to the feminist cause, knowing that this will bring in the votes and do their career no harm.
Let's take just one example. Sir Keir Starmer. Until Monday of this week, he was Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. In the 2010s, he was an ambitious lawyer who had become Director of Public Prosecutions. He was well aware of the extensive meta-analysis on the rates of false accusation of rape, ranging from 5% to as high as 47% in some of the studies. These had been collated in 2006 by Philip N S Rumney, who concluded that a realistic estimate of false allegation was somewhere between 12% to 15%.
These figures are not a good fit with women being blameless creatures. The effects of false accusation are devastating. Here, for example, a review of 146 cases of false allegation involved sixteen DEATHS. Twelve were suicides of the falsely accused. One was the suicide of the mother of the falsely accused. One was a homicide due to vigilante action, and one was the death in prison of an innocent man. These are the sorts of figures a man like Starmer is willing to tolerate in order to curry favour with feminists, and climb the greasy political pole. For, his solution was to weaponise the failings of the Crown Prosecution Service. Only 0.6% of false accusers find themselves in the dock, to receive a slap on the wrist for perjury, or wasting police time. So, in the 2013 Levitt Report, authored by Starmer and Alison Levitt QC, it is claimed that rates of false accusation are, therefore, 0.6%, and men have nothing to worry about.
Meanwhile, Alison Levitt QC, now Baroness Levitt KC, takes her seat in the House of Lords and plots further lawfare against men - in this case the facilitation of male asset stripping in a heterosexual relationship, even if the protagonists are not married.
Of course, the end game is not framed as such. The narrative is that Violence Against Women & Girls is so widespread that, if a woman makes such an allegation, she must be believed. On no account must she be forced to relive her trauma through the courts, as her acting skills might desert her in her hour of need, and she may well forget the details of her tissue of mistruths. This lawfare does a disservice to all men, and the genuine female victims out there. It makes a nonsense of 'law', and renders association with women a very dangerous pastime for men.
The lies of the Violence Against Women & Girls (VAWG) is central to the feminist hydra, it crops up again and again. Of course, it helps that Starmer skewed the figures. Only from 2017 onwards were the CPS papers forced to insert a tiny footnote - "includes data of violence against men and boys". A deliberate attempt to make all men perpetrators, and all women victims.
I could go on, but Starmer sickens me. Nonetheless, as alluded, he has met the fate of all male feminist enablers. They are useful only while they serve female interests, and are subsequently utterly disposable. While in office as Prime Minister, he was forced to sack several of his female Cabinet... Louise Haigh when her conviction for fraud came to light. Angela Rayner for not paying her taxes. Lucy Powell, a feminist who claimed that ethnic grooming gangs were irrelevant (she defends a seat with a 60% ethnic population, and would lose their votes). These women didn't go quietly. Instead, like a coven of witches, they plotted against Starmer and destabilised his Premiership. They didn't throw their own hat into the ring. Instead, they had another male stoolpigeon do the necessary wet work...Andy Burnham....Prime Minister of UK since Monday 20th July 2026.
The peace will be maintained for as long as he follows the diktats of the feminist politburo and apparatchik for an unlimited Welfare State which Britain can no longer afford, and anti-male lawfare based on VAWG lies. Otherwise, he, too, will find himself within whatever frame they wish to place him.
Most of us have heard about the Gender Pay Gap, but in doing some TransGender research, I googled about the differences between male and female orgasms.
I recently watched an interview where the interviewer pointed out that: some Journalists, now a days, are looking at you blind, blandly and saying, 'it's not a big story otherwise we'd publish it. You know, it's just not that interesting for us!'
Reframing!
Tom, you have hit the Nail on the head.
The biblical saying: 'God has rent the veil, and the devil cannot mend it' comes to mind from the depths....
You have 'rent the veil', Tom and exposed the underbelly of the Hydra.
hydra : a multifarious evil not to be overcome by a single effort
Men have always had to “tough it out”; this goes back to our “Hunting and Gathering” Period. Going forth, into the Ice Age cold to bring home a Mastodon, or a Saber-Toothed Squirrel, requited no-holds-barred wherewithal.
The problem is, that we are not simple creatures at all; we just did what needed to be done. Through the “advancement” of the Human Race, we began to realize the value
of our contribution, and risk, only to have it
undermined at a critical time of intellectual development: “First Wave Feminism” arrives.
Flash Forward to 1975. The ballyhooed “Second
Wave”. of the Feminist Movement is about to be fully “mainstreamed”. A new book, opened to more fanfare than it deserved, was released:
“AGAINST OUR WILL: Men, Women, And Sexual Violence” promoted the idea that every man was a potential Predator. It’s kind of difficult to
convince Society that Men are worthy of care,
when we are reduced to the sub-human.
There is a newly released Book:
“TILTING AT WINDMILLS: An Ostensible Diversity”, Which goes into this subject. While the organization has notable shortcomings, it offers a fun to read,hard hitting view.
We have seen the progressive degeneration of concern for Men’s emotional wellbeing long enough. A total revamping is ling overdue.
Indeed. Long overdue.
It's bizarre how you've taken great offense to a book against sexual violence. Are you big mad about rape kit reform & the testing of hundreds of thousands of backlogged rape kits? Are you mad that one of first wave feminism's goals was to raise the age of consent from 12 to 16?
We can't afford compassion to those deemed to be workhorses, packmules, cannon fodder and scapegoats.
Yes! Meaning arises only from interpretation. The determination not to see is as important as what is seen.
Many who style themselves researchers become apologists and polemicists when the data speaks in ways that depart from the prevailing narrative -- and there are forces of considerable power arrayed to "keep them in line."
Meaning comes from purposes aligned towards our telos.
Syntax, semantics, meaning.
That's from grammar.
The Trivium is the flaming sword that defines the denotation and etymology of words, and valid logical rules, leading to persuasive words.
It all starts with the word and operates on creation
Yes, and haven't we seen some manipulation of words and meanings!
Derrida performed a dictionary attack, subverting it like sappers under an enemy trench planting explosives.
Marcuse followed up with repressive tolerance.
In the politically correct lexicon, there's an epistemic closure on woke, and dissent or critique becomes impossible.
Well said.
I believe gamma bias is real as we see it in other culturally biased instances. Example: Black Deaths Matter when a white police officer is involved regardless of circumstances but the far, far, far greater numbers of intraracial deaths in the black community get ignored. Apparently black lives only matter when the blame can be assigned outside the black community....but I digress.
The problem with gynocentrism is that hostility to boys and men is actually the goal as a means elevating women. Even when the harms visited upon boys and men are revealed any action that might mean drawing attention and resources away from women, let alone require women to take responsibility for harm THEY are causing, will be met with violent disapproval. There is really no way to avoid the conclusion that relational hostility is the core and goal of feminism and women as a group have whole heartedly embraced it. This requires a response that needs must impact ALL women.
Interesting point that diminishing men raised up women and girls. And given gynocentrism it was just so easy to do and got such a positive response it just got addictive.
An easy addiction for a population that is prone to narcissism!
Marvelous piece. So on target.
Thank you Sina!
A lot of men's problems are caused by Feminism, it was feminism that caused boys to fail thier schooling, Feminists use tactics against boys to make them fail , they don't want equality and for the same reason they have got divorce courts biased against fathers, they leave men to do very dangerous work yet complain there is inequality with pay, Feminists say men are privileged but they were saying that when millions of men were being killed and injured in the great war , if women want equality why wont they demand to be treated exactly the same as men, the answer is that feminists are liars, sexists and misandrist hypocrites.
Great work!
Reframing is the intellectual counterpart of the pressure flip.
Gynocrats perform gymnastics when corrupting principles, like the unconstitutional family courts which routinely overrule higher courts. The judges simply decline to hear cases appealing and recluse themselves indefinitely.
It causes great suffering to men who internalize morality based on justice and the reality principle.
But the highest logos walks on water and defeats their sleight of hand with based truth, applying the trivium like a flaming sword.
During my most crushing failures and depressions I have sought humor, just as a father jokes with his children to reframe their challenges along their road to adult transcendence of them.
When you're in the middle of the ocean forced away from the old shore and hearing towards the far, it's the death of the soul, but you learn to breath underwater.
Semiotics will allow us to decrypt the gynofascist tyranny.
The psychology of woman won't remain secret in the face of trillions of videos, pictures, and transcripts.
We'll rebuild from first principles.
There'll be a vast museum of misandry as part of the truth and reconciliation process.
If women can't play their part, they're purging rebellion from the gene pool.
Thank you Conrad. Yes, one post at a time!
Women today are sexists.
FULL STOP.
Look, when you live in a world where “kill all men” is an actual common thing, then yeah…. you aren’t oppressed, you are the oppressor.
Do you really think that kneecapping an entire gen z dating pool from entry to higher education and job entry is going to end well for you?
What you have created is a generation of gen z women who will hit 35 and be left with the reality of what sexism/feminism really leaves them with. Guess what ladies, your dating pool has evaporated ( and you are to blame ) now you will be expected to be Mommy-hags, taking care of you SAHB who plays x-box all day and orders door dash on your credit card.
I personally love watching this unfold :)
Language matters ⬆️. Please see the link posted above.
https://speakingofsuicide.com/2017/09/21/suicide-language/
https://stephenwrotethat.substack.com/p/the-good-friend?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=7z8a5r
Men would benefit greatly in a world in which equality between women and men was understood and valued. We don't live in that world. We live in a world that values equity instead. Men are understood to have a head start, a built-in advantage. In order to bring women up to that level, we have to give them more consideration, attention, assistance, support, etc. Equity inevitably maximizes women's problems and minimizes men's problems. The unwritten rule is that if there is something wrong with women, it is men's fault; and if there is something wrong with men (men are suffering), that is also men's fault. In a world that valued equality, men would get more assistance. As a majority in many ways, women have all the benefits of being seen as the minority. As a minority in many ways, men have no benefits but instead carry the burden of being seen as the majority. This is how discrimination is, by feminists, seen as social justice.
Indeed Allen, and that perceived gap never seems to diminish does it? It's a constant.
Feminist Research is all about fudging the numbers to make men look bad!
The problem begins with women being the majority of the electorate. Politicians of whatever flavour then prioritize female concerns as vote winners. The main female concerns are access to resources, and unfettered reproductive rights. Therefore, the job market must be skewed to her benefit (AA,EEO, DEI, ESG) and she must be able to dissolve marriage to her benefit, through 'no-fault' divorce. It must be framed that women have suffered historical grievous disadvantage in these institutions. The narrative must be one of constant oppression of female sainthood by a remorseless Patriarchy. Any deviation from this Grim Fairy Tale will now be ruthlessly suppressed.
For the past seventy years or so, a succession of male politicians have nailed their colours to the feminist mast, and acted as sock puppets to the feminist cause, knowing that this will bring in the votes and do their career no harm.
Let's take just one example. Sir Keir Starmer. Until Monday of this week, he was Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. In the 2010s, he was an ambitious lawyer who had become Director of Public Prosecutions. He was well aware of the extensive meta-analysis on the rates of false accusation of rape, ranging from 5% to as high as 47% in some of the studies. These had been collated in 2006 by Philip N S Rumney, who concluded that a realistic estimate of false allegation was somewhere between 12% to 15%.
https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-429.pdf
These figures are not a good fit with women being blameless creatures. The effects of false accusation are devastating. Here, for example, a review of 146 cases of false allegation involved sixteen DEATHS. Twelve were suicides of the falsely accused. One was the suicide of the mother of the falsely accused. One was a homicide due to vigilante action, and one was the death in prison of an innocent man. These are the sorts of figures a man like Starmer is willing to tolerate in order to curry favour with feminists, and climb the greasy political pole. For, his solution was to weaponise the failings of the Crown Prosecution Service. Only 0.6% of false accusers find themselves in the dock, to receive a slap on the wrist for perjury, or wasting police time. So, in the 2013 Levitt Report, authored by Starmer and Alison Levitt QC, it is claimed that rates of false accusation are, therefore, 0.6%, and men have nothing to worry about.
https://www.centreformalepsychology.com/male-psychology-magazine-listings/false-allegations-of-rape-the-true-extent-remains-unknown?rq=Bradford
Meanwhile, Alison Levitt QC, now Baroness Levitt KC, takes her seat in the House of Lords and plots further lawfare against men - in this case the facilitation of male asset stripping in a heterosexual relationship, even if the protagonists are not married.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/millions-of-unmarried-couples-to-get-stronger-rights
Of course, the end game is not framed as such. The narrative is that Violence Against Women & Girls is so widespread that, if a woman makes such an allegation, she must be believed. On no account must she be forced to relive her trauma through the courts, as her acting skills might desert her in her hour of need, and she may well forget the details of her tissue of mistruths. This lawfare does a disservice to all men, and the genuine female victims out there. It makes a nonsense of 'law', and renders association with women a very dangerous pastime for men.
The lies of the Violence Against Women & Girls (VAWG) is central to the feminist hydra, it crops up again and again. Of course, it helps that Starmer skewed the figures. Only from 2017 onwards were the CPS papers forced to insert a tiny footnote - "includes data of violence against men and boys". A deliberate attempt to make all men perpetrators, and all women victims.
I could go on, but Starmer sickens me. Nonetheless, as alluded, he has met the fate of all male feminist enablers. They are useful only while they serve female interests, and are subsequently utterly disposable. While in office as Prime Minister, he was forced to sack several of his female Cabinet... Louise Haigh when her conviction for fraud came to light. Angela Rayner for not paying her taxes. Lucy Powell, a feminist who claimed that ethnic grooming gangs were irrelevant (she defends a seat with a 60% ethnic population, and would lose their votes). These women didn't go quietly. Instead, like a coven of witches, they plotted against Starmer and destabilised his Premiership. They didn't throw their own hat into the ring. Instead, they had another male stoolpigeon do the necessary wet work...Andy Burnham....Prime Minister of UK since Monday 20th July 2026.
The peace will be maintained for as long as he follows the diktats of the feminist politburo and apparatchik for an unlimited Welfare State which Britain can no longer afford, and anti-male lawfare based on VAWG lies. Otherwise, he, too, will find himself within whatever frame they wish to place him.
The case studies, including 16 fatal outcomes from 146 false allegations.
https://empathygap.uk/Rape%20Case%20Histories%20modified%2017_8_20.pdf
CT
Most of us have heard about the Gender Pay Gap, but in doing some TransGender research, I googled about the differences between male and female orgasms.
I found these two, amongst many, links:
'The orgasm gap and why women climax less than men' https://theconversation.com/the-orgasm-gap-and-why-women-climax-less-than-men-208614
'Orgasm Gap Between Men and Women Is WORSE Than You Think.' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnYvjazrK30
The Reframing is all in the language used for the titles and the play on the word 'gap'.
I recently watched an interview where the interviewer pointed out that: some Journalists, now a days, are looking at you blind, blandly and saying, 'it's not a big story otherwise we'd publish it. You know, it's just not that interesting for us!'
Reframing!
Tom, you have hit the Nail on the head.
The biblical saying: 'God has rent the veil, and the devil cannot mend it' comes to mind from the depths....
You have 'rent the veil', Tom and exposed the underbelly of the Hydra.
hydra : a multifarious evil not to be overcome by a single effort