As I was reading this, I was standing on a train platform in Berlin, Germany. In front of me was a state-funded poster advertising tax-funded protection against violence. But only for women and _their_ children.
No, not the children who live with men and not for fathers whose children live with their mothers. Protection against domestic violence is explicitly only for women and their property.
Men are not protected from violence and neither are children because children are only regarded as women's appendages.
It happens so often: when mothers control their husbands over their children, they can be as violent and aggressive as they like. Even if the father has been disposed of or has fled and the mothers vent their anger on the children, the children are given no protection from domestic violence.
Women's strongest means of exerting pressure on fathers is to have their children taken away from them. If these fathers then flee from the violence at some point, they usually lose their children. This is how the system works throughout the western world.
Who protects the children from the Furies if not their fathers? Nobody.
I've replaced your words 'state funded' with 'tax payers money'...
The latest horror here in Switzerland is that the feminists want more money and equated it to the Military Budget.. on every franc spent....
....which the latest is, that the military have two uniforms.. one for work and one for social.. I'm leaving it at those details right now.. but the Government is investigating that the Military only need one uniform.. to save 55 million Swiss francs.. which will possibly go to finance the Military...
I'm going from: governments don't protect citizens with proper Justice and governments seem not to have proper Policies in place...
I find it continually amazing that any government can seem to collect as much tax, print money - as they wish.. whilst murmuring something about a budget.. but I can tell you that even in my lovely life - I must live within my budge... so how is it that the budget is made by our leaders, approved by our leaders and then acted on rather than what citizens want to budget for ??
I'm just saying... I have no real answers but I wonder a lot about things... all the 'deep pockets', all the 'bottomless pockets'...
I gotta say, as a dv survivor myself that none of these entities actually really help women or children either. Most of them are really just predatory entities themselves. I’ve been to our local dv services, and a few children’s advocacy centers.
Well said Sara. Even the research is recognizing this element of the DV world. They describe that they call "3rd party abuse" which is meant to convey the idea that the falsely accused man, who was being abused by his female partner has now be transferred to a new set of abusers comprised of the police, the judicial system, the shelters, etc. They take over where she left off.
This is very true also of sexual "harassment" and "rape" agencies. They only help those willing to use their cases to advance the agenda of Big Feminism and will REFUSE service to women (let alone men) who don't allow their cases to be used in that fashion.
I was thinking I might post some of this comment on Tom's Swedish video from a couple of posts ago.. but.. I cannot say to much
so, a muslim man is here as a refugee for many years (I'm not this person in this story).. living on nothing but he is still better off here in Switzerland than where he came from.. however, what about his Human Rights.. what about his wife that is still in the old country.. it seems that they will not give the refugee full status but actually they could and then bring the wife here and take her away from the nasty raping men.. but that is not about to happen..... they could live on a pension and she would be away from 'the nasty regime of men'.. but ..
so I hope you all get my point and there are probably many points but the main one I wish to make today is aligned with what you said : that none of these entities actually really help women or children either
To truly understand why the domestic violence industry refuses to acknowledge the reality of female DV against males, you have to realize that people are far more likely to care and take action in the case of DV if one side (women) are always seen as innocents victimized by evil monsters (men). This is the quintessential fairy tale story of good vs. evil. If it gets more complicated than that, people lose interest and stop caring.
Interesting. It's as if men have become the personification of evil. Kind of like the KKK, Nazis and Commies. Reality is easier to comprehend if it's clear who is the villains are. Anything that doesn't fit with the belief system cause cognitive dissonance and is rejected.
Sadly, this is not surprising. Perhaps its time for some equity with the president using an executive order suspending all federal funding to any shelter that does not provide equitable services to men.
As I was reading this, I was standing on a train platform in Berlin, Germany. In front of me was a state-funded poster advertising tax-funded protection against violence. But only for women and _their_ children.
No, not the children who live with men and not for fathers whose children live with their mothers. Protection against domestic violence is explicitly only for women and their property.
Men are not protected from violence and neither are children because children are only regarded as women's appendages.
It happens so often: when mothers control their husbands over their children, they can be as violent and aggressive as they like. Even if the father has been disposed of or has fled and the mothers vent their anger on the children, the children are given no protection from domestic violence.
Women's strongest means of exerting pressure on fathers is to have their children taken away from them. If these fathers then flee from the violence at some point, they usually lose their children. This is how the system works throughout the western world.
Who protects the children from the Furies if not their fathers? Nobody.
Well said.
I've replaced your words 'state funded' with 'tax payers money'...
The latest horror here in Switzerland is that the feminists want more money and equated it to the Military Budget.. on every franc spent....
....which the latest is, that the military have two uniforms.. one for work and one for social.. I'm leaving it at those details right now.. but the Government is investigating that the Military only need one uniform.. to save 55 million Swiss francs.. which will possibly go to finance the Military...
I'm going from: governments don't protect citizens with proper Justice and governments seem not to have proper Policies in place...
I find it continually amazing that any government can seem to collect as much tax, print money - as they wish.. whilst murmuring something about a budget.. but I can tell you that even in my lovely life - I must live within my budge... so how is it that the budget is made by our leaders, approved by our leaders and then acted on rather than what citizens want to budget for ??
I'm just saying... I have no real answers but I wonder a lot about things... all the 'deep pockets', all the 'bottomless pockets'...
I gotta say, as a dv survivor myself that none of these entities actually really help women or children either. Most of them are really just predatory entities themselves. I’ve been to our local dv services, and a few children’s advocacy centers.
I believe you btw.
Well said Sara. Even the research is recognizing this element of the DV world. They describe that they call "3rd party abuse" which is meant to convey the idea that the falsely accused man, who was being abused by his female partner has now be transferred to a new set of abusers comprised of the police, the judicial system, the shelters, etc. They take over where she left off.
This is very true also of sexual "harassment" and "rape" agencies. They only help those willing to use their cases to advance the agenda of Big Feminism and will REFUSE service to women (let alone men) who don't allow their cases to be used in that fashion.
I'm curious about your description of domestic violence shelters as predatory entities. Could you explain what your mean?
I can..I will write a short post/essay.
I was thinking I might post some of this comment on Tom's Swedish video from a couple of posts ago.. but.. I cannot say to much
so, a muslim man is here as a refugee for many years (I'm not this person in this story).. living on nothing but he is still better off here in Switzerland than where he came from.. however, what about his Human Rights.. what about his wife that is still in the old country.. it seems that they will not give the refugee full status but actually they could and then bring the wife here and take her away from the nasty raping men.. but that is not about to happen..... they could live on a pension and she would be away from 'the nasty regime of men'.. but ..
so I hope you all get my point and there are probably many points but the main one I wish to make today is aligned with what you said : that none of these entities actually really help women or children either
It is all virtue signalling.
Second verse, same as the first.
To truly understand why the domestic violence industry refuses to acknowledge the reality of female DV against males, you have to realize that people are far more likely to care and take action in the case of DV if one side (women) are always seen as innocents victimized by evil monsters (men). This is the quintessential fairy tale story of good vs. evil. If it gets more complicated than that, people lose interest and stop caring.
Interesting. It's as if men have become the personification of evil. Kind of like the KKK, Nazis and Commies. Reality is easier to comprehend if it's clear who is the villains are. Anything that doesn't fit with the belief system cause cognitive dissonance and is rejected.
Sadly, this is not surprising. Perhaps its time for some equity with the president using an executive order suspending all federal funding to any shelter that does not provide equitable services to men.
I really hope Trump does that. He has done some good things for men.
That would be a dream come true!
Thanks for sharing your story, Daniel. What you've experienced and continue to experience just sucks.
In another (non-gynocentric) reality, your story would be printed in a national newspaper and be turned into a movie.
This really hurts to read.
Makes me so angry.
I just want to sue some DV places now.
Bravo! Keep up the good work.