Ok. Wait a minute. Men die earlier from almost every major disease, they live shorter lives, and they have no federal offices specifically for their health. All that, and what do Jill and Joe Biden do? They crank out a half a billion dollars for women’s health! What do you think of this? Does it show that gynocentrism runs silent and deep?
If you have even the slightest doubt about this be sure to check out Jim Nuzzo’s substack article that lays out the facts around gynocentrism and biomedical research.
Here’s a look at the beginning of the article:
First lady Jill Biden on Monday unveiled a new set of actions to address health inequities faced by women in the United States, plans that include spending at least $500 million annually on women's health research.Jill Biden made the announcement at this year’s Clinton Global Initiative annual meeting in New York, moments before the organization honored President Joe Biden with the 2024 Clinton Global Citizen Award.
“He's provided a playbook for getting things done,” former President Bill Clinton, said as he presented the award. “We honor him today, not just for what he's accomplished, but for the way he has done it.”
President Biden, standing next to his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Clinton Foundation Vice Chair Chelsea Clinton, joked, “This is what you call being trapped.”
In his short remarks, he then called Jill Biden's announcement one of the most substantial of his administration.
The additional government spending will mainly come from the Department of Defense, which provides medical care to more than 230,000 active duty military women and nearly 2 million military retirees, as well as their family members. The research will focus on why these women experience endocrine, hematological and other immunity-related disorders twice as often as men.
“Women are really hungry for this kind of information,” Jill Biden said. “We don't have the answers.”
Another change will take effect next week, with a new policy that includes women's health at every step of the research funded by Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, which funded 751 grants last year to study Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, lupus, orthopedic and musculoskeletal injuries, and various cancers.
HERE WE GO AGAIN!: First, we need to see through Feminist Binary Health Lie #1: “WOMEN ARE PHYSIOLOGICALLY INTENDED TO LIVE LONGER THAN MEN.” Let’s use a car analogy: About 75-80% of men are varying types of 4 Wheel Drives. We have substantially more robust frames, and capabilities, especially when the going gets rough. 90+% of Women are road cars; less capable of strenuous, or seriously high stress work.
GIVEN THE SAME OPERATING CONDITIONS, THE 4 Wheel Drives will well outlast the road cars. The problem is: We don’t experience the dame operating conditions! Men have it way tougher!
We should honor the men that do the hard, dangerous labor more. When I was young, back in the Pleistocene, I’d injured my back because some “cheese-head” manager was trying to make a name for himself. A 350lb hand-truck load did not go over a big door sill; my back said: “wrong move”. I hit the cement floor in agony. Child-birth, on a LOGARITHMIC SCALE, for a Gravida-1 female is low 7, in the pain department. A bad back spasm is a high 7, to low 8. It was a rough two week recovery. For my injury, I received $85! This is a paltry sum for having a recurring injury for the rest of my life.
Years later, even before the Mass Idiocy of
“Me Too”, I’d heard of some Hollywood bimbo getting 8.5 million dollars for a “casting couch fiasco”. Ten Hundred Thousand times the amount. Does anyone (in their right mind) think this is fair? I know I’m not alone in any facet of this argument.
Women already receive a VASTLY greater level of concern - and finance in virtually every department. It is an unacceptable imbalance.
The Democrats have lost the LAST of their genuine intellectuals. What remains are the products of brainwashing; although in most cases, a good rinse would suffice!
The beat(ing) goes on!