I’ve grown accustomed to hearing politicians talk about men’s health, usually focusing on the idea that men need to stop taking risks and start going to the doctor.
Words are nice (and more than men/boys have received from any other "president" of the last 50+ years), but we need action. Let's see removal of family courts, massive updates to divorce laws, equality within Selective Service (or, better yet, elimination of SSS or elimination of 19th until SSS is equal), continued destruction of the media, separation of feminists and law enforcement, defunding of public institutions that place females on pedestals and kick males to the curb, etc.
Also, we live in a massive "simp" society. The majority of men are scared to stand up for themselves. Get your b@lls back and stop worrying about what others think of you...call out hypocrisy when you see it.
Finally, REFUSE to play the game until a semblance of true equality is achieved or learn how to hack the rig because the game is rigged in favor of women/elites.
Thank you, Edward. I will write to President Trump, and ask him to take the next step with funding male health, family court reform, etc. (comments@whitehouse.gov).
Good idea Frank, thank you. I would do the same myself, but at this point cannot trust myself not to, ah, get a bit too frisky. Tell him more than he wants to know.
The anglo nations, along with Western Europe, generally follow whatever cultural changes America makes. If America is feminist, they are feminist, as most of them -- from a financial and military p.o.v. -- are not much more than satrapies of the U.S. at this point.
This statement by President Trump would not rise to that level of 'noncoercive coercion', but if Trump backs this talk up with concrete steps against the gynarchy . . . that WOULD get the attention of the nations under discussion. That would make a very big wave indeed and it would particularly freak out the EU, which largely is just a bunch of overprivileged, empowered women LARPing at being men.
It is, and always has been, a game rigged by elites and collective female power. We must consider these entities our mortal enemies, as they have demonstrated this daily for the past 60 years.
Thanks for pointing out this crucial element in our dispossession and degradation. Western elites use female empowerment as a bat to beat down, and to keep down, men and boys. While consolidating their own power and wealth. In the old days, men knew what to do with such greedy, scheming scumbags.
You want to make a proclamation, Mr. Trump? Notify the elites -- you know who they are, you are one of them -- that you are now backing men and masculinity, and feminism no longer will be tolerated, much less funded and enforced by the State.
You will have our back? lol WHEN, may I ask, will that begin?
Talk is cheap. When you start implementing CONCRETE measures to crush feminism, and to restore men to some semblance of fairness and position in a nation in which collective female power rules the courts, schools, colleges, media, corporations, government, and churches . . . THEN I might take you seriously.
Go to the next Feminist Caucus meeting -- Demoncrap or Repugnicant -- and declare that from now on, you have the backs of the MEN and BOYS of the nation, and you will tolerate feminist tyranny no longer. Don't yap, show me.
I want executive orders, sponsored legislation, arm-twisting of the Legislature, calling out and denouncing Totalitarian Feminism wherever you see it (which is everywhere) . . . including in your own family. Ahem ahem.
I want Feminist Jurisprudence prosecuted promptly, with criminal judges jailed when they persecute men from their high bench of power. I want the 'family court system' razed to the ground, and all its anti-male personnel fired . . . at minimum. I want women who castrate 'their' sons jailed immediately, for long terms in state or federal prison. Etc.
Interesting Post Michael K. What place does love, consideration, good manners as the norm from both sexes, mutual help and supporting each other have within that diatribe.
It's very simple Tom. No one cares about men and boys. Men and boys should live their lives accordingly. I went public and offered my leadership to secure the rights of men and boys in June 2008. Men are not interested in securing their rights. Men don't even care about themselves. That is where we are. When men want that to change? They will support me. Its really that simple.
Peter, it is not about supporting you. I've been at this since the mid-Nineties myself . . . but it ain't about supporting me either.
Yes men hate hate hate to confront women, much less actually to restrict them. Yes U.S. men are inveterate wimps and cowards, who betray other men while elevating their princess daughters (and thus, themselves).
We are in the business of aiding our brothers, Peter. Not elevating ourselves.
Michael, I said: "When men want that to change? They will support me. Its really that simple." If you don't want to support me securing the rights of other men? That's fine. I mean you are doing such a good job of it yourself, right? Men have their rights secured because of your efforts, right? You know how to not pay alimony and child support, right? You know how a man can unilaterally divorce his wife and pay her nothing, right?
Peter, you said you offered your leadership to men, and that you feel they rejected your offer, ergo they can't possibly care, because they didn't up and follow you.
Ever been in the military, Peter? Men choose their leaders autonomously. You can't say to men, follow me I'm the leader, and then slag men because doods didn't jump onto your ship. It doesn't work that way amigo. It's not about you, or me. And dumping on me ain't gonna help the situation.
I have said my piece and am done with this matter.
Michael, you say: "Peter, you said you offered your leadership to men, and that you feel they rejected your offer, ergo they can't possibly care, because they didn't up and follow you."
How stupid can you be? No wonder you do not use your full name in public. You are a very stupid man to say something this stupid in public.
I went public in June 2008. I offered my leadership, world wide, to secure the rights of men as well as to address the planned depopulation program. For example I proved alimony and child support are voluntary payments in January 2008. A LOT of men were complaining about alimony and child support so I did them the favour of publishing three different ways to not pay them. Men called me a liar and told me they knew that alimony and child support were mandatory because the government told them it was.
I do not "feel" men rejected my offer of leadership. It is a FACT men rejected my offer of leadership. Women talking about feelings. Men talk about facts. You talk like a woman.
No. Men do not choose their leaders in the military. When you join the military as a private you get a CO and you have no choice in that CO. I mean, how dumb ARE you?
You say "I have been at this since the mid-90s. So? What have you achieved? Do tell us all.
My statement is very simple"
"When men want that to change? They will support me."
While men refuse to support me? They are welcome to defend their own rights. After all? They are doing such a bang up job of it so far, aren't they.
"What rights did you say you wanted to secure for men and boys?"
All of them Jane. For example? Today no man or boy has any of these rights secured.
1. The right to say what he sincerely believes to be true in the public square or even in private.
2. The right to bodily autonomy.
3. The right to freedom.
4. The right to benefit from the proceeds of his own labor.
5. The right to own property.
6. The right to live in the house he paid for.
7. The right to speak to his own children.
8. The right to raise his own children.
9. The right to self defense.
That's a good starting list.
"Why do you think your message did not resonate?"
Jane. One of the MANY reasons many of us man hate many of you women is that your first response to us, as well as later responses, is to lie about us, mis-represent us, and then condemn us for your lies. I am 61 years old I am an honest man of honour and integrity.
Since my mother taught me to be honest when I was 3-4 years old? I have told two lies in my life. Once when I was 12 and once when I was 14. Boys tell lies to get what they really want, we give in to our impulses as boys and some times we lie and steal to get something we reall want. It's called "growing up".
I have not told a lie since I was 14. I have told girls, then women, since I was 6 years old in 1970, that we do not like being lied to and we do not like being lied about. I told girls and women that if you keep lying about us we will know you are liars and we will not believe ANYTHING you say.
You women take the position that we must believe everything a woman says despite the fact you lie to use to much. The fall back position is that we must believe you on every point and that we must disprove you on every point.
No. Us men do not work like that. We never have and we never will. The way that men work is that if a man or a woman lies to a man and he finds out it is a lie? We approach the man / woman and we present the lie and the evidence we have for the lie and we ask them if they knew they were lying at the time. We ask them to renounce the lie in the same forum it was presented, publicly apologise, make any compensation necessary for the lie, and then publicly make oath never to lie again.
If a man or woman will not go through those steps having been caught lying? We call them a liar and we never believe ANYTHING they say ever again unless they PROVE what they said is true. And most men will not bother to give the person the chance to prove what they said is true.
This is why. Among men, we have the saying: "A man is as good as his word". And it only takes a man to break his word once, to lie once, and to not go through that process and we are DONE with that man. If the man makes oath to never lie again we will give him a second chance. But if he lies again he is DONE for the rest of his life.
That is how us men work. We have worked that way for 4,000+ years. And yet you women lie to our faces and expect us to not treat you as "equals" but to have us allow your lies.
Real men like me will not tolerate the lies of you women any more Jane.
Now. I did not say what I said "did not resonate". I said, and I quote:
"Men are not interested in securing their rights. Men don't even care about themselves. That is where we are. When men want that to change? They will support me. Its really that simple."
Why did men not support me? Because they are cowards and cheap cowards at that.
For example? I was served a divorce court order for EUR6000 per month (100% of my salary) on 2007-11-29. I read the order and it took me about 10 seconds to realise it was voluntary. In January 2008 I sent my lawyer to the divorce court meeting to explain how I knew the order was voluntary. The judge, my lawyer, and my ex-wifes lawyer all agreed the court order was voluntary.
So then my ex wifes lawyer ASKED me for money. I said no. I pointed out Jennifer already got her $A250K for "her half of the house" and had spent it. I pointed out there was an offer on the table for either $A250K or $300K depending on whether the children went with me or her. The $50K being the maximum payable child support for a total of 6 years child support.
Since men were crying loudly on the internet about alimony and child support, I, out of the goodness of my heart, went public in June 2008 and told men that alimony and child support were voluntary. I did that knowing full well women and their beta brad criminals in governments would attack me because you women really like your alimony and child support. And you women really like unlawfully jailing men as political prisoners for not paying these voluntary amounts.
Now...you would have thought men would rejoice in finding out alimony and child support are voluntary and they would have stopped volunteering in their millions. No. They didn't. They attacked me instead. Why? Because they know any man who stops paying alimony and child support will be put on blast by his ex wife and she will do all she can to destroy his life.
So those men chose to attack me for telling them that alimony and child support are voluntary because they are too cowardly to face up to you women and the power you have to call them paedophiles and to destroy their lives.
Jane. You women should NEVER have taken the path of falsely calling me a paedophile for standing up to my criminal, child abusing, lying prostitute ex wife. But you did. And now you women will ALL pay the price of refusing to punish your peers who are criminals.
As far as all those cowardly cheap skate men go? Even today, in 2025, they attack me and slander me when I remind them that I proved alimony and child support are voluntary payments. They are pathetic cowards. My message resonated. My message went straight in to their thick skulls you can be certain. But men are too cowardly to help me and too cheap to even "buy me a coffee".
Women are increasingly choosing to stay single and childfree, which means a lot of men will also be single and childfree. This will solve nearly all of the problems you listed.
"This will solve nearly all of the problems you listed"
No Jane. It does not. One of the biggest problems us men have with you women is your false allegations. All women support womens crimes of perjury, false allegations and slander against men.
I have told girls, then women, from 1970 when I was 6 years old, that us men do not like being lied to and we do not like being lied about. And yet all women support womens lies about men here in 2025. This has cost ALL WOMEN their credibility. Women really should have taken my advice, freely given, over the last 55+ years. Punish girls and women who lie about boys and men. But...you...didn't. And all men know it.
"Women are increasingly choosing to stay single and childfree"
And yet the most common topic of tiktok videos is:
"Where have all the good men gone".
We know that when a woman hits 30 her "baby rabies" cuts in. By the time they are 35 women are almost insane with "baby rabies". It is women who want children much more than men.
Trying this lie on a man who is 61 is pathetic Jane. How old are you? I am guessing 15 or 16.
BTW Jane, from the posts you repost it's pretty clear you are a communist. Because you women never read books you won't know it was Karl Marx who called for no fault divorce with high child support. It was Lenin who first implemented it in the new communist russia in 1919. He implemented no fault divorce and mandated 33% of a mans salary and or wealth to be given to the mother based on an accusation a man was the father of the child..
Obviously there were no paternity test then. And the new communist government stole the property of the man based on the womans word, very often lies. So what happened? Men stopped working, took up drinking, and stole what they needed to survive. The number of men who stopped working was so large that food production was far below what was needed and so Russia when and stole the food from the Ukraine and an estimated 10 million Ukrainians starved to death.
No fault divorce with high child support caused such catastrophic social damage that it was STALIN who repealed it in 1936. When STALIN is the man who says "This is too harmful for our country" you know it is poison.
And another way you know it is poison is that when Russia occupied eastern europe in 1946 they imposed no fault divorce and high child support in countries who opposed them like Romania.
As a communist? You are sponsoring the same tactics that killed more than 10 million Ukrainians in the 1920s-30s and millions more men since.
You women never listen to us men. And communist women never listen even more intently Jane.
PS. There was a man named Herbert Marcuse who was at the Frankfurt School in the 1920s. Hitler knew the Frankfurt School was a communist institution and he banned it. Marcuse fled to California where he met an impressionable young man who was an aspiring actor. His name was Ronald Reagan. You may have heard of him. Reagan was such a commie his nickname was "Red Ronnie".
It appears that Marcuse befriended the young communist and taught him the lesson "the best way to control the opposition is to lead it" and so Red Ronnie made his pretended transition to "Republican". But the fact that he introduce soviet communist no fault divorce to California in 1969 as governor rather gave the game away as to which team he was playing for. Red Ronnie was a devout communist util the day he died.
Jane...the LAST thing you women should be demanding is "equal rights to men" because men have no right secured at all....and that is where you women are heading too. That you were willing to betray your men means that when the hammer comes down on you women your men will not defend you. You women expect your "Beta Brads" will defend you when the hammer comes down. They won't. And the real men like me won't either.
Oh yes, you women will scream insults at us men. But having falsely accuses us of being paedophiles, wife beaters, rapists and child abusers for decades? What else are you going to call us?
Jane. Did the book need to be called "The Little Girl Who Cried Wolf" for you women to realised that if you keep telling lies no one would listen to you? Hm?
Jane, I am 61. I was married for 18 years. I raised 4 children including 2 boys and 2 girls. So I know you women better than you know your selves. Now. You asked me a question and I actually spent my valuable time answering your question because you are on the men are good substack.
Now that I have answer your question? Your job is to address my answer. Not to ask another question. I know you women are such manhaters that the only reason you ask questions is to waste our time garnering male attention. You women really should have answered as many questions as you ask to keep the balance. But you won't. You women keep asking questions without ever answering our questions.
So, I expect you to address my answers. I expect you to do it professionally, politely, and publicly. You know. Like a real man. Like I just did.
Because you women never bothered to learn how to answer our questions? If you want to ask me another question? You are going to have to offer me the value of the answer to you. If you take the position that my answer has no value to you by not offering to pre-pay me? Then don't bother asking the question because I won't answer it because you take the position my time and effort and answer is worth nothing to you.
You women really should have learned to offer to pay men for our work. You want "equal pay" but only when you receive the payment. You don't want to pay men for what you demand to be paid for....your time.
And yes, you have to prepay for my time because I consider all women liars whose word is not worth the paper it is not written on.
Personally, I'll admit I like Donald Trump. I like his brash, direct, masculine style -- extremely rare in Goddess Columbia's District -- and I like the delight he takes in discomfiting the enemies of the nation, external and internal. I think he really does love Traditional America, as it was fifty or sixty years ago, despite being essentially an Eighties Liberal.
As pertains to this issue, Mr. Trump is VERY good at sniffing the cultural and political winds. Over the past decade, particularly, men online have been showing the way forward for America . . . assuming it wants to continue as a nation.
You can be certain that Mr. Trump and/or his agents are quite aware that there is a large, and growing, percentage of U.S. men who have awakened to the pogroms against them and are expressing their dissension to our feminist nation and culture openly and powerfully.
Mr. Trump is aware of this faction, thus his unusual presidential message. This is the time to press the potential opening he provided.
I totally agree that saying this, as POTUS, is fantastic news. Some people are saying "talk is cheap", but it certainly is not. If it were, other western leaders would say a few "cheap" remarks about the disadvantages faced by men and the consequences. THEY DO NOT! Not one western leader in decades has said one word on the plight of men, or our need to recognise the unique contribution, despite it all being obvious to men, women, and especially to parents of boys. NOT ONE WORD IN DECADES!
So much for "talk is cheap" - no one else has uttered the "cheap" talk.
Bravo, POTUS Trump, for having the nerve to just SAY SOMETHING in the face of derision and hostility, on behalf of people who can't speak for themselves.
Why does everyone suppose that men are so weak, lacking drive, ambition and capability that only by the total suppression of women can men have enough courage and acumen to live full and happy lives? What does that actually say about these men? It says that they are not able to feel like men unless they can restrict and control the lives and freedom of women. It is putting down others because you want by this means to make yourself feel superior.
What drivel and utter nonesense. I was married for 42 years to a man who exemplified male strength. He was well mannered, hard working, creative and absolutely in control of himself. He encouraged me to do exciting things, to improve and to enjoy our time together. Yes he spoiled me but I spoiled him too. There should be no superior or inferior in relationships between men and women. There are major and yet most of the time complementary differences between the sexes. So, you men actually want to see a return to powerless, disenfranchised women with no freedom to make choices for themselves. Not only is America losing its democracy but it can no longer call itself “Land of the free”. This situation is not only the fault of Mr. Trump but also of the bigots, racists and self seeking persons who follow him. Woe unto those who thinking only of themselves fail to see the City Walls crumbling around them. When you have driven all others away, where then shall be your protection?
Yvonne Ellizabeth, you are right ! Most of the time, there are major but complementary differencies between the sexes. A family should be a team, in which women and men do their best to reach success !
Only feminists want rivalry between the sexes, so long as politicians proclaim women as "victims" and men as "predators". These women are but politicians ' s dupes who seek power and wealth from theit votes.
Thank you Julok 39. I think that extremes, feminists and misogynists do nothing but hurt relationships between men and women. We need to realise that both sexes basically need the same things, love, emotional security, companionship, friendship with each other and mutual respect. A happy marriage where both partners are engaged in enabling the happiness and progress of each other is what should be the norm of married relationships. Instead of hurling insults let’s try and give compliments and encourage each other instead of constant fault finding and denigration. A happy marriage is the greatest thing available to both male and female. The song “ Oh heaven is a place on Earth’ has always appealed to me. Of course there will be disagreements, but there will also be love and understanding of the different ways in which we each see life.
In a nation of true equals Men and Women should be different but no rivals and their needs should be cared equaly.
In a feminist view, women are men's victims so men should submit to women to reach equality.
But in a well organised society ( family or enterprise) women and men are a team, different but necessary to a successful goal. Rivals for success ? It means chaos ! Julock 39
The problem is that the Democrats have not had any concern for men, for decades. In the runup to the 2024 election, they stated on their site that they support women, but not men. They have since taken that page down.
Yup. The Left despises and disenfranchises men and boys, while the Right just ignores us. So little wonder that men skew Rightward, as ignoring us is preferable to outright persecution and loathing.
You are right, Michael. I wrote to DOGE about the far greater funding for women’s health than men’s health, and I think they did cut some funding for women’s health. But that still isn’t doing anything for men. I once contacted Senator Hawley, who tells men to get married and start families. I told him that men were staying single so they don’t get trashed in divorce court. He didn’t reply after that
Well, good for you for taking that initiative, no matter the (inevitable) non-response from the gynarchy.
Just because a senator or assemblyman is male does not mean they operate independent of the gynarchy. Josh Hawley is just another overgrown little boy in a man's body, busily doing whatever he thinks will please women in the moment.
Yup. That's where America is, and where it has been for decades.
Like the rest of his colleagues, Joshie will not touch even CRITICISM of the gynarchy with a ten-foot pole. He runs and hides when a strong man confronts him with the truth about the nation, as you did. He doesn't have to admit straight-out what he is; his silence in the face of righteousness is enough of an answer.
Hawley is quite representative of 'conservatives' and Republicans: utterly gelded and compliant to the American matriarchy, while pretending wisdom and justice and fairness. Ptooey. What a joke of a nation.
Yes, it really sucks. It’s good to see that Trump has taken the lead on this. The more men that write him, and steer him towards eliminating the divorce court system, funding men’s health, the better.
I left New Amerika long ago, not for any legal or familial or statutory reason, but because I hate the matriarchy and its institutions with all my heart. The U.S. is no place for man like me. I love my adopted country and to my surprise, I am respected and even loved in return. Completely different than my experiences in New Amerika.
I avoid contacting any type of official there, especially government officials. But I will consider sending a note to Donald in a few days as encouragement for his gesture.
You mean that nutty piece in the nation? Can you believe it? I can. The left has been saying this for years. It’s what pushed me away. It’s such insane gaslighting.
A real game changer, for sure. 😊 Now we need to build on this to refute the myth of “patriarchal privilege.”
Words are nice (and more than men/boys have received from any other "president" of the last 50+ years), but we need action. Let's see removal of family courts, massive updates to divorce laws, equality within Selective Service (or, better yet, elimination of SSS or elimination of 19th until SSS is equal), continued destruction of the media, separation of feminists and law enforcement, defunding of public institutions that place females on pedestals and kick males to the curb, etc.
Also, we live in a massive "simp" society. The majority of men are scared to stand up for themselves. Get your b@lls back and stop worrying about what others think of you...call out hypocrisy when you see it.
Finally, REFUSE to play the game until a semblance of true equality is achieved or learn how to hack the rig because the game is rigged in favor of women/elites.
Social change does not happen as a result of a single proclamation. It’s a first step. Now we need to build on that.
Thank you, Edward. I will write to President Trump, and ask him to take the next step with funding male health, family court reform, etc. (comments@whitehouse.gov).
Good idea Frank, thank you. I would do the same myself, but at this point cannot trust myself not to, ah, get a bit too frisky. Tell him more than he wants to know.
I'll give it a few days and maybe try then.
Here is another way to write President Trump, from this page:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
I guarantee that the Australian Prime Minister would not be strong enough to make a statement similar 🤨
“In the big fight, my man is accused… and innocent!”
Are you Australian Rachael?
Doubtless.
The anglo nations, along with Western Europe, generally follow whatever cultural changes America makes. If America is feminist, they are feminist, as most of them -- from a financial and military p.o.v. -- are not much more than satrapies of the U.S. at this point.
This statement by President Trump would not rise to that level of 'noncoercive coercion', but if Trump backs this talk up with concrete steps against the gynarchy . . . that WOULD get the attention of the nations under discussion. That would make a very big wave indeed and it would particularly freak out the EU, which largely is just a bunch of overprivileged, empowered women LARPing at being men.
This is a huge step on the rigth direction. In the very rigth one!
It is, and always has been, a game rigged by elites and collective female power. We must consider these entities our mortal enemies, as they have demonstrated this daily for the past 60 years.
Thanks for pointing out this crucial element in our dispossession and degradation. Western elites use female empowerment as a bat to beat down, and to keep down, men and boys. While consolidating their own power and wealth. In the old days, men knew what to do with such greedy, scheming scumbags.
You want to make a proclamation, Mr. Trump? Notify the elites -- you know who they are, you are one of them -- that you are now backing men and masculinity, and feminism no longer will be tolerated, much less funded and enforced by the State.
I'll wait while you get on that. :O)
This is amazing!! Indeed.
I have establish a "Male Health Week" in my team after sharing this message.
You will have our back? lol WHEN, may I ask, will that begin?
Talk is cheap. When you start implementing CONCRETE measures to crush feminism, and to restore men to some semblance of fairness and position in a nation in which collective female power rules the courts, schools, colleges, media, corporations, government, and churches . . . THEN I might take you seriously.
Go to the next Feminist Caucus meeting -- Demoncrap or Repugnicant -- and declare that from now on, you have the backs of the MEN and BOYS of the nation, and you will tolerate feminist tyranny no longer. Don't yap, show me.
I want executive orders, sponsored legislation, arm-twisting of the Legislature, calling out and denouncing Totalitarian Feminism wherever you see it (which is everywhere) . . . including in your own family. Ahem ahem.
I want Feminist Jurisprudence prosecuted promptly, with criminal judges jailed when they persecute men from their high bench of power. I want the 'family court system' razed to the ground, and all its anti-male personnel fired . . . at minimum. I want women who castrate 'their' sons jailed immediately, for long terms in state or federal prison. Etc.
Empty words are woman's way. Show me or shut up.
Interesting Post Michael K. What place does love, consideration, good manners as the norm from both sexes, mutual help and supporting each other have within that diatribe.
I make no substantive responses to uppity wimmin who mischaracterize and derogate my TRUTHFUL comments as a 'diatribe'.
Buzz off, three-named fembot beeyotch.
Yes your reply was as articulate and well phrased as I would have expected. Thank you.
Heartening to see this, Tom. I would never have imagined such a thing would appear. Happy 4th!
It's very simple Tom. No one cares about men and boys. Men and boys should live their lives accordingly. I went public and offered my leadership to secure the rights of men and boys in June 2008. Men are not interested in securing their rights. Men don't even care about themselves. That is where we are. When men want that to change? They will support me. Its really that simple.
Peter, it is not about supporting you. I've been at this since the mid-Nineties myself . . . but it ain't about supporting me either.
Yes men hate hate hate to confront women, much less actually to restrict them. Yes U.S. men are inveterate wimps and cowards, who betray other men while elevating their princess daughters (and thus, themselves).
We are in the business of aiding our brothers, Peter. Not elevating ourselves.
Michael, I said: "When men want that to change? They will support me. Its really that simple." If you don't want to support me securing the rights of other men? That's fine. I mean you are doing such a good job of it yourself, right? Men have their rights secured because of your efforts, right? You know how to not pay alimony and child support, right? You know how a man can unilaterally divorce his wife and pay her nothing, right?
Peter, you said you offered your leadership to men, and that you feel they rejected your offer, ergo they can't possibly care, because they didn't up and follow you.
Ever been in the military, Peter? Men choose their leaders autonomously. You can't say to men, follow me I'm the leader, and then slag men because doods didn't jump onto your ship. It doesn't work that way amigo. It's not about you, or me. And dumping on me ain't gonna help the situation.
I have said my piece and am done with this matter.
Michael, you say: "Peter, you said you offered your leadership to men, and that you feel they rejected your offer, ergo they can't possibly care, because they didn't up and follow you."
How stupid can you be? No wonder you do not use your full name in public. You are a very stupid man to say something this stupid in public.
I went public in June 2008. I offered my leadership, world wide, to secure the rights of men as well as to address the planned depopulation program. For example I proved alimony and child support are voluntary payments in January 2008. A LOT of men were complaining about alimony and child support so I did them the favour of publishing three different ways to not pay them. Men called me a liar and told me they knew that alimony and child support were mandatory because the government told them it was.
I do not "feel" men rejected my offer of leadership. It is a FACT men rejected my offer of leadership. Women talking about feelings. Men talk about facts. You talk like a woman.
No. Men do not choose their leaders in the military. When you join the military as a private you get a CO and you have no choice in that CO. I mean, how dumb ARE you?
You say "I have been at this since the mid-90s. So? What have you achieved? Do tell us all.
My statement is very simple"
"When men want that to change? They will support me."
While men refuse to support me? They are welcome to defend their own rights. After all? They are doing such a bang up job of it so far, aren't they.
What rights did you say you wanted to secure for men and boys? Why do you think your message did not resonate?
"What rights did you say you wanted to secure for men and boys?"
All of them Jane. For example? Today no man or boy has any of these rights secured.
1. The right to say what he sincerely believes to be true in the public square or even in private.
2. The right to bodily autonomy.
3. The right to freedom.
4. The right to benefit from the proceeds of his own labor.
5. The right to own property.
6. The right to live in the house he paid for.
7. The right to speak to his own children.
8. The right to raise his own children.
9. The right to self defense.
That's a good starting list.
"Why do you think your message did not resonate?"
Jane. One of the MANY reasons many of us man hate many of you women is that your first response to us, as well as later responses, is to lie about us, mis-represent us, and then condemn us for your lies. I am 61 years old I am an honest man of honour and integrity.
Since my mother taught me to be honest when I was 3-4 years old? I have told two lies in my life. Once when I was 12 and once when I was 14. Boys tell lies to get what they really want, we give in to our impulses as boys and some times we lie and steal to get something we reall want. It's called "growing up".
I have not told a lie since I was 14. I have told girls, then women, since I was 6 years old in 1970, that we do not like being lied to and we do not like being lied about. I told girls and women that if you keep lying about us we will know you are liars and we will not believe ANYTHING you say.
You women take the position that we must believe everything a woman says despite the fact you lie to use to much. The fall back position is that we must believe you on every point and that we must disprove you on every point.
No. Us men do not work like that. We never have and we never will. The way that men work is that if a man or a woman lies to a man and he finds out it is a lie? We approach the man / woman and we present the lie and the evidence we have for the lie and we ask them if they knew they were lying at the time. We ask them to renounce the lie in the same forum it was presented, publicly apologise, make any compensation necessary for the lie, and then publicly make oath never to lie again.
If a man or woman will not go through those steps having been caught lying? We call them a liar and we never believe ANYTHING they say ever again unless they PROVE what they said is true. And most men will not bother to give the person the chance to prove what they said is true.
This is why. Among men, we have the saying: "A man is as good as his word". And it only takes a man to break his word once, to lie once, and to not go through that process and we are DONE with that man. If the man makes oath to never lie again we will give him a second chance. But if he lies again he is DONE for the rest of his life.
That is how us men work. We have worked that way for 4,000+ years. And yet you women lie to our faces and expect us to not treat you as "equals" but to have us allow your lies.
Real men like me will not tolerate the lies of you women any more Jane.
Now. I did not say what I said "did not resonate". I said, and I quote:
"Men are not interested in securing their rights. Men don't even care about themselves. That is where we are. When men want that to change? They will support me. Its really that simple."
Why did men not support me? Because they are cowards and cheap cowards at that.
For example? I was served a divorce court order for EUR6000 per month (100% of my salary) on 2007-11-29. I read the order and it took me about 10 seconds to realise it was voluntary. In January 2008 I sent my lawyer to the divorce court meeting to explain how I knew the order was voluntary. The judge, my lawyer, and my ex-wifes lawyer all agreed the court order was voluntary.
So then my ex wifes lawyer ASKED me for money. I said no. I pointed out Jennifer already got her $A250K for "her half of the house" and had spent it. I pointed out there was an offer on the table for either $A250K or $300K depending on whether the children went with me or her. The $50K being the maximum payable child support for a total of 6 years child support.
Since men were crying loudly on the internet about alimony and child support, I, out of the goodness of my heart, went public in June 2008 and told men that alimony and child support were voluntary. I did that knowing full well women and their beta brad criminals in governments would attack me because you women really like your alimony and child support. And you women really like unlawfully jailing men as political prisoners for not paying these voluntary amounts.
Now...you would have thought men would rejoice in finding out alimony and child support are voluntary and they would have stopped volunteering in their millions. No. They didn't. They attacked me instead. Why? Because they know any man who stops paying alimony and child support will be put on blast by his ex wife and she will do all she can to destroy his life.
So those men chose to attack me for telling them that alimony and child support are voluntary because they are too cowardly to face up to you women and the power you have to call them paedophiles and to destroy their lives.
Jane. You women should NEVER have taken the path of falsely calling me a paedophile for standing up to my criminal, child abusing, lying prostitute ex wife. But you did. And now you women will ALL pay the price of refusing to punish your peers who are criminals.
As far as all those cowardly cheap skate men go? Even today, in 2025, they attack me and slander me when I remind them that I proved alimony and child support are voluntary payments. They are pathetic cowards. My message resonated. My message went straight in to their thick skulls you can be certain. But men are too cowardly to help me and too cheap to even "buy me a coffee".
https://menaregood.substack.com/p/presidential-message-on-national/comment/131854385
Women are increasingly choosing to stay single and childfree, which means a lot of men will also be single and childfree. This will solve nearly all of the problems you listed.
"This will solve nearly all of the problems you listed"
No Jane. It does not. One of the biggest problems us men have with you women is your false allegations. All women support womens crimes of perjury, false allegations and slander against men.
I have told girls, then women, from 1970 when I was 6 years old, that us men do not like being lied to and we do not like being lied about. And yet all women support womens lies about men here in 2025. This has cost ALL WOMEN their credibility. Women really should have taken my advice, freely given, over the last 55+ years. Punish girls and women who lie about boys and men. But...you...didn't. And all men know it.
"Women are increasingly choosing to stay single and childfree"
And yet the most common topic of tiktok videos is:
"Where have all the good men gone".
We know that when a woman hits 30 her "baby rabies" cuts in. By the time they are 35 women are almost insane with "baby rabies". It is women who want children much more than men.
Trying this lie on a man who is 61 is pathetic Jane. How old are you? I am guessing 15 or 16.
BTW Jane, from the posts you repost it's pretty clear you are a communist. Because you women never read books you won't know it was Karl Marx who called for no fault divorce with high child support. It was Lenin who first implemented it in the new communist russia in 1919. He implemented no fault divorce and mandated 33% of a mans salary and or wealth to be given to the mother based on an accusation a man was the father of the child..
Obviously there were no paternity test then. And the new communist government stole the property of the man based on the womans word, very often lies. So what happened? Men stopped working, took up drinking, and stole what they needed to survive. The number of men who stopped working was so large that food production was far below what was needed and so Russia when and stole the food from the Ukraine and an estimated 10 million Ukrainians starved to death.
No fault divorce with high child support caused such catastrophic social damage that it was STALIN who repealed it in 1936. When STALIN is the man who says "This is too harmful for our country" you know it is poison.
And another way you know it is poison is that when Russia occupied eastern europe in 1946 they imposed no fault divorce and high child support in countries who opposed them like Romania.
As a communist? You are sponsoring the same tactics that killed more than 10 million Ukrainians in the 1920s-30s and millions more men since.
You women never listen to us men. And communist women never listen even more intently Jane.
PS. There was a man named Herbert Marcuse who was at the Frankfurt School in the 1920s. Hitler knew the Frankfurt School was a communist institution and he banned it. Marcuse fled to California where he met an impressionable young man who was an aspiring actor. His name was Ronald Reagan. You may have heard of him. Reagan was such a commie his nickname was "Red Ronnie".
It appears that Marcuse befriended the young communist and taught him the lesson "the best way to control the opposition is to lead it" and so Red Ronnie made his pretended transition to "Republican". But the fact that he introduce soviet communist no fault divorce to California in 1969 as governor rather gave the game away as to which team he was playing for. Red Ronnie was a devout communist util the day he died.
Jane...the LAST thing you women should be demanding is "equal rights to men" because men have no right secured at all....and that is where you women are heading too. That you were willing to betray your men means that when the hammer comes down on you women your men will not defend you. You women expect your "Beta Brads" will defend you when the hammer comes down. They won't. And the real men like me won't either.
Oh yes, you women will scream insults at us men. But having falsely accuses us of being paedophiles, wife beaters, rapists and child abusers for decades? What else are you going to call us?
Jane. Did the book need to be called "The Little Girl Who Cried Wolf" for you women to realised that if you keep telling lies no one would listen to you? Hm?
How can men be both protectors and victims of women?
Jane, I am 61. I was married for 18 years. I raised 4 children including 2 boys and 2 girls. So I know you women better than you know your selves. Now. You asked me a question and I actually spent my valuable time answering your question because you are on the men are good substack.
Now that I have answer your question? Your job is to address my answer. Not to ask another question. I know you women are such manhaters that the only reason you ask questions is to waste our time garnering male attention. You women really should have answered as many questions as you ask to keep the balance. But you won't. You women keep asking questions without ever answering our questions.
So, I expect you to address my answers. I expect you to do it professionally, politely, and publicly. You know. Like a real man. Like I just did.
Because you women never bothered to learn how to answer our questions? If you want to ask me another question? You are going to have to offer me the value of the answer to you. If you take the position that my answer has no value to you by not offering to pre-pay me? Then don't bother asking the question because I won't answer it because you take the position my time and effort and answer is worth nothing to you.
You women really should have learned to offer to pay men for our work. You want "equal pay" but only when you receive the payment. You don't want to pay men for what you demand to be paid for....your time.
And yes, you have to prepay for my time because I consider all women liars whose word is not worth the paper it is not written on.
https://buymeacoffee.com/peterandrewnolan
Now. You can address the answer I already gave you....or not. I predict you will not because all women are manhaters. Ok?
Take care Peter.
Sounding great but have to wait and see what happens. The feminist ratbags are not about to let this happen without a fight.
Lea, you women refused to help us men. I did ask for 17 years. You said no. All of you. More than 50,000 of you.
Personally, I'll admit I like Donald Trump. I like his brash, direct, masculine style -- extremely rare in Goddess Columbia's District -- and I like the delight he takes in discomfiting the enemies of the nation, external and internal. I think he really does love Traditional America, as it was fifty or sixty years ago, despite being essentially an Eighties Liberal.
As pertains to this issue, Mr. Trump is VERY good at sniffing the cultural and political winds. Over the past decade, particularly, men online have been showing the way forward for America . . . assuming it wants to continue as a nation.
You can be certain that Mr. Trump and/or his agents are quite aware that there is a large, and growing, percentage of U.S. men who have awakened to the pogroms against them and are expressing their dissension to our feminist nation and culture openly and powerfully.
Mr. Trump is aware of this faction, thus his unusual presidential message. This is the time to press the potential opening he provided.
Thanks, Tom. Unfortunately he didn’t message the absence of funding for men’s health.
I totally agree that saying this, as POTUS, is fantastic news. Some people are saying "talk is cheap", but it certainly is not. If it were, other western leaders would say a few "cheap" remarks about the disadvantages faced by men and the consequences. THEY DO NOT! Not one western leader in decades has said one word on the plight of men, or our need to recognise the unique contribution, despite it all being obvious to men, women, and especially to parents of boys. NOT ONE WORD IN DECADES!
So much for "talk is cheap" - no one else has uttered the "cheap" talk.
Bravo, POTUS Trump, for having the nerve to just SAY SOMETHING in the face of derision and hostility, on behalf of people who can't speak for themselves.
Talk is cheap.
Why does everyone suppose that men are so weak, lacking drive, ambition and capability that only by the total suppression of women can men have enough courage and acumen to live full and happy lives? What does that actually say about these men? It says that they are not able to feel like men unless they can restrict and control the lives and freedom of women. It is putting down others because you want by this means to make yourself feel superior.
What drivel and utter nonesense. I was married for 42 years to a man who exemplified male strength. He was well mannered, hard working, creative and absolutely in control of himself. He encouraged me to do exciting things, to improve and to enjoy our time together. Yes he spoiled me but I spoiled him too. There should be no superior or inferior in relationships between men and women. There are major and yet most of the time complementary differences between the sexes. So, you men actually want to see a return to powerless, disenfranchised women with no freedom to make choices for themselves. Not only is America losing its democracy but it can no longer call itself “Land of the free”. This situation is not only the fault of Mr. Trump but also of the bigots, racists and self seeking persons who follow him. Woe unto those who thinking only of themselves fail to see the City Walls crumbling around them. When you have driven all others away, where then shall be your protection?
Yvonne Ellizabeth, you are right ! Most of the time, there are major but complementary differencies between the sexes. A family should be a team, in which women and men do their best to reach success !
Only feminists want rivalry between the sexes, so long as politicians proclaim women as "victims" and men as "predators". These women are but politicians ' s dupes who seek power and wealth from theit votes.
Wah wah wah.
Thank you Julok 39. I think that extremes, feminists and misogynists do nothing but hurt relationships between men and women. We need to realise that both sexes basically need the same things, love, emotional security, companionship, friendship with each other and mutual respect. A happy marriage where both partners are engaged in enabling the happiness and progress of each other is what should be the norm of married relationships. Instead of hurling insults let’s try and give compliments and encourage each other instead of constant fault finding and denigration. A happy marriage is the greatest thing available to both male and female. The song “ Oh heaven is a place on Earth’ has always appealed to me. Of course there will be disagreements, but there will also be love and understanding of the different ways in which we each see life.
Finally, the leader of a country says 'something' about Men.
@Frank who gave contact information for President Trump - email address: comments@whitehouse.gov and The White House https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
for those who wish to contact President Trump.
Edit: after I'd posted my comment I received an email from Bettina Arndt about 'False Allegations' https://bettinaarndt.substack.com/p/payback-for-false-allegations
This is something that could be brought up when writing President Trump!!!
What would a society that met the needs of men, women and children look like? Has such a society ever existed? If so, where and when?
In a nation of true equals Men and Women should be different but no rivals and their needs should be cared equaly.
In a feminist view, women are men's victims so men should submit to women to reach equality.
But in a well organised society ( family or enterprise) women and men are a team, different but necessary to a successful goal. Rivals for success ? It means chaos ! Julock 39
Are you ready for another Warp speed VAXX?
I’ll just leave this here.
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/supreme-court-porn-free-speech/#
Well making sure boys can have access to modern internet “porn” is not supporting men. Men don’t want their kids impacted by that shit.
And it’s not access it’s targeting teens. Is so gross and smug.
The problem is that the Democrats have not had any concern for men, for decades. In the runup to the 2024 election, they stated on their site that they support women, but not men. They have since taken that page down.
Yup. The Left despises and disenfranchises men and boys, while the Right just ignores us. So little wonder that men skew Rightward, as ignoring us is preferable to outright persecution and loathing.
You are right, Michael. I wrote to DOGE about the far greater funding for women’s health than men’s health, and I think they did cut some funding for women’s health. But that still isn’t doing anything for men. I once contacted Senator Hawley, who tells men to get married and start families. I told him that men were staying single so they don’t get trashed in divorce court. He didn’t reply after that
Well, good for you for taking that initiative, no matter the (inevitable) non-response from the gynarchy.
Just because a senator or assemblyman is male does not mean they operate independent of the gynarchy. Josh Hawley is just another overgrown little boy in a man's body, busily doing whatever he thinks will please women in the moment.
Yup. That's where America is, and where it has been for decades.
Like the rest of his colleagues, Joshie will not touch even CRITICISM of the gynarchy with a ten-foot pole. He runs and hides when a strong man confronts him with the truth about the nation, as you did. He doesn't have to admit straight-out what he is; his silence in the face of righteousness is enough of an answer.
Hawley is quite representative of 'conservatives' and Republicans: utterly gelded and compliant to the American matriarchy, while pretending wisdom and justice and fairness. Ptooey. What a joke of a nation.
Yes, it really sucks. It’s good to see that Trump has taken the lead on this. The more men that write him, and steer him towards eliminating the divorce court system, funding men’s health, the better.
I left New Amerika long ago, not for any legal or familial or statutory reason, but because I hate the matriarchy and its institutions with all my heart. The U.S. is no place for man like me. I love my adopted country and to my surprise, I am respected and even loved in return. Completely different than my experiences in New Amerika.
I avoid contacting any type of official there, especially government officials. But I will consider sending a note to Donald in a few days as encouragement for his gesture.
Thanks for your leadership on this issue.
OMG 😧 astonishing perspective… scary rhetoric from the left
You mean that nutty piece in the nation? Can you believe it? I can. The left has been saying this for years. It’s what pushed me away. It’s such insane gaslighting.