And regarding the Selective Service, i.e., registering for the draft, the law was changed last year with enactment of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), signed into law in December 2025. Now, instead of actively registering, young menwill be "automatically" registered when they turn 18.
Significantly, when Congress updated the registration system they could have expanded it to cover men and women, but decided to continue the systemic sexism.
How many feminists complained about that discrimination, they say men are privileged and they say they want equality so why don't feminists demand equality registering for the draft.
liabilities or not women deserve the privilege they insist men have, they should be sent to the battlefields and it would maybe stop them complaining about male privilege.
Interesting that someone who would consider themselves feminist ( when it’s convenient?) has zero concern for the mothers and wives of other countries that she pillages and whose citizens she helps kill. And where are these womens voices for all the little girls aborted because they are girls in India etc.
I thought the feminists stacks were bad for females complaining bitterly about men and endlessly blaming and bashing them for everything eg Epstein files but this stack seems to be the male equivalent. And that’s a disappointment.
Where are you seeing women being blamed and bashed? Just have a re-read of this article, for example, and you will see that Tom is talking of people in general - not just women - who favour women. It is a human condition. Nobody is bashing women. There is implied criticism of the systems that favour women without giving men any favours but (as we are often reminded) it is men who are the majority in such systems.
Lincoln’s letter to Lydia Bixby who lost sons in the civil war....Rudyard Kiplings son Jack, whom he forced to go, was only 18 when he was killed at Loos WWI. Vera Brittain Testament of Youth fame wrote of losing the man she loved in that war too...I’m not sure women suffer more though because those husbands and sons endure horrors beyond words and often suffer endlessly unless they find healing..we have to work together to end all this horror this blood sacrifice to moloch and baal.
Most men in history did not reproduce, they were the slaves and soldiers.
Men would be vigilant if walking about with a bundle of cash. Women are vigilant as they walk around with a baby maker and golden vagina.
Vagina is Latin for scabbard, i.e. a sword sheath.
The women who were overt and truthful did not pass their genes on in sufficient numbers. The deceitful women acquired beta male resources and alpha male genetics.
Today, state sponsored gamma bias protects and validates womens deceit of mass paternity discrepancy.
One third of women have killed a child.
One third of court ordered paternity tests come back negative.
Women have majority Suffrage and votes for more taxes because only men are net tax payers as a group and only women are net lifetime welfare recipients as a group.
The central pillar of the welfare industrial complex is child support. Enforced by an unconstitutional court applying an unconscionable contract. The state pays women to discard men, retaining sexual access to his wallet, while reserving her vagina for other men.
Several billion children have been killed by their mothers since infanticide was legalized around 1970 and pushed globally.
Didn’t those one third and several billion babies killed by their mothers have fathers? Noticeably absent? Kissinger, the de pop king, is responsible for a lot of this actually including over four hundred million forced abortions in China. De pop and second wave feminism are massive psy ops for, and from, the globalists. All the real conspiracy theories germ gene virus that supports vaxx theory and Freudianism claptrap helps sustain it all including trans theory. Not to mention Darwin bringing up the rear. These real conspiracy theories are simple to see because they all lead to nihilism. Divorce etc is a direct result from all this, the charge being led by CIA asset, and false prophetess, Gloria Steinem. By the way stats can be massaged to produce any outcome one wants. It was one of Churchill’s, another globalist and lover of the Great Game, fav tools to con the public with. One third of women in the USA have been sexually abused. Add that to your stat list. Eve was a remarkable, wise woman and did what was essential to get you here. American Military men have the biggest reputation for financial abuse of their wives. It is rampant. And I am very well acquainted with it. I know of one woman married for 36 years five children that let the ex keep it all. And there was a fat purse. He loved money above everything else so she allowed him to keep it. All. I would say, on the whole, that we have created this mess together. No Shiva without Shakti.
Please add the statistics for how often violence is perpetuated toward a woman by a man. And how many men in how many men kill a child. The stats you pointed out were true ish....you can't leave out data simoly.because it doesn't fit into your extremist views.
I read what you are saying SOLEY to remind me of why feminism is just as necessary now as it has ever been. It is obvious to me that you are-A-a man, B-You consume news and "facts" that stay with your beliefs and dont bother with the other side. Banning abortion is about so much more than "women murdering babies".
My next point-"taxing" you? Please look into "pink tax" and see the numbers there. Most of that money goes toward protection for women from men.
My final point is that I dont have the time or patience or will to explain all the ways that if you do not possess a uterus, or higher education on said female organs, you should really not have the majority of the say over them. (Them meaning uteruses collectively)
Men are the only group of net lifetime tax payers.
Women have majority Suffrage.
Today, a couple hundred thousand babies were painfully chased around with metal tools, dismembered, poisoned, and left for dead. It is a crying shame. How many vegan mothers did this?
Women have beat the drum for "equality" my entire life - and of course, well before that - so perhaps, while taking into account real sex differences, there should be what Bill Maher might call, "new rules."
1) If the US military draft is revived, then make it universal:
- both men and women
- exceptions for pregnancy or with children
- no combat roles for women in areas where direct physical confrontation is likely, i.e. infantry. Anything else is on the table - pilot, sailor, etc.
2) Complete revamping of all "family law" in all states
- since the marriage contract is just that, breaking it requires demonstration of fault - i.e., eliminate no-fault divorce. Infidelity, financial profligacy, abuse, etc. are grounds. Whoever files bears the burden of proving fault.
- no automatic preference for either parent in child custody
- automatic DNA testing of all newborns, with failure automatic grounds for divorce
- adopt Virginia's family law on assets: any asset that you did not actively manage during the marriage, whether passively managed (i.e. index funds) or managed by third party, remains with that partner in divorce. (That one is near and dear to my divorced little heart, LOL)
Do these things and men will start taking on marriage again. Fail to do so, and the consequences are left to the reader to calculate.
The phrase “But the women and children!" carries obvious moral weight because they are weaker and more vulnerable. This means they require defense - by men. And from an evolutionary perspective it is those mothers who will carry on the future generations.
There was an interview series of soldiers before going into battle in Korea. They had accepted that they could die. What bothered them was the possibility of never becoming fathers. I think it says a lot when fatherhood itself today can be dismissed as optional.
In my 20s, I was keen to discover what it meant to belong to the gender that feminists claimed was oppressing the female gender.
There was always a feeling that something was not quite correct about the claims feminists were making
.
Why Men Are the Way They Are (1986): I eagerly read this book, only it was convoluted and obtuse in its coverage of Issues that men experience. I thought it was a foundation for further in-depth exploration of the issues men were experiencing.
Most importantly, Farrell admitted that he finally started to hear what men were saying.
At the time, I thought that men would learn to identify and, more importantly, articulate the issues they were experiencing.
Little did I realise that the feminist overseers want only approved feminist approaches to men's groups awareness and consciousness raising exercise, comparing notes on how badly the female gender was treating them was not encouraged and actively discouraged.
The identification of female abusers was effectively shut down in the public sphere, as Erin Pizzey and other honest researchers into Domestic Violence found out.
The main problem with 'women and children first' is that women have applied it in that order...
On the Titanic 74% of the women survived, but only 52% of the children. And 20% of the men. The men prioritised the women and children, the women did not do the same.
Here is Australia that mentality is still found in emergencies, from the response to Cyclone Tracy to the evacuation of Wuhan.
I have to ask. If you are a proponent for gamma bias, it tells me that you believe that women have NOT suffered (historically) disproportionately to men? You dont see a real patriarchy? Men have suffered just as much as women? I am not trying to argue with you, I am genuinely curious because this.ganma bias thing is something I thought was made up. Like the flat earthers...
Also, Birkenhead Protocol is just that a "protocol", a social construct. Maritime law says let's save everyone!! And thats LAW
Very well said. I appreciate what you are pointing out. I had always thought, "well someone has to have the babies and the kids can grow up to take the place of the men that went last" I truly had never thought about men as expandable. Of course I've never been faced with a disaster in which this was something to be decided. I have always said the same about the draft. If all genders can enlist, all genders should be eligible to draft.
As you said, I understand the logic behind women and children first, and as a feminist it makes me uncomfortable to think that while attempting to destroy the patriarchy, women have made men feel, as you said, expendable.
I struggle with being a feminist that likes to have the door pened for me amd doesnt hate me. Shortly therr is a happy medium?
In response to a feminist post of F/B, I asked the question, "If men have all the power, why do women make the Rules?" To say the least, the responses were very hostile.
Looking for examples to support the above supposition, I totally forgot about the book title "The Rules.
After being tarred and feathered, keelhauled, figuratively castrated and labelled a Neanderthal and that I am crazy and in need of some therapy. Below is a summary of my response.
“The Rules” was a book written by two women, Ellen Fein and Sherrie Schneider first published in 1995.
Quote<“ The book suggests gendered dating rules that a woman should follow in order to attract and marry the man of her dreams; these rules include that a woman should be "easy to be with but hard to get".[3] The underlying philosophy of The Rules is that women should not aggressively pursue men, but rather, should encourage the men to pursue them.>Unquote.
Three years later, in 1998, Jack Kammer asked this question.“If men have all the Power, how come women make the rules?”
That question was asked by Kammer, and, in an attempt to explore the issue, he wrote and published a book titled after it.
It is clear from the responses that it was very triggering for some people.
The book was labelled as a Conspiracy and Misogynistic by Eric Keenlyside.
Eileen Tenore wrote, “Get some therapy now. Before you escalate”.
Chrystal Shaffer wrote, “I love it when the low IQ Neanderthals crawl out of their dumpster fires A. you provide so much entertainment”.
L B Ammon wrote, “people who say this usually mean something like "why don't I have unrestricted access to a woman's body?". Is that what you mean?”
The above personal attacks demonstrate not only bullying but total intolerance to exploring alternative ideas or concepts that may challenge existing belief systems.
And regarding the Selective Service, i.e., registering for the draft, the law was changed last year with enactment of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), signed into law in December 2025. Now, instead of actively registering, young menwill be "automatically" registered when they turn 18.
Significantly, when Congress updated the registration system they could have expanded it to cover men and women, but decided to continue the systemic sexism.
How many feminists complained about that discrimination, they say men are privileged and they say they want equality so why don't feminists demand equality registering for the draft.
The armed forces does not need more walking liabilities in uniform.
Liabilities? I hate to even ask for you to explain that to me like im just a little ol woman.
liabilities or not women deserve the privilege they insist men have, they should be sent to the battlefields and it would maybe stop them complaining about male privilege.
and all those men have moms. And dads.
Hilary Clinton said women are most affected by war because they lose their husbands and sons.
what if women were sent to fight in a war, while men stayed home accusing them of being privileged, H Clinton is a sexist pig.
Women are highly stressed by a man at rest on the sofa.
What awful creatures!
God can be cruel.
Interesting that someone who would consider themselves feminist ( when it’s convenient?) has zero concern for the mothers and wives of other countries that she pillages and whose citizens she helps kill. And where are these womens voices for all the little girls aborted because they are girls in India etc.
I thought the feminists stacks were bad for females complaining bitterly about men and endlessly blaming and bashing them for everything eg Epstein files but this stack seems to be the male equivalent. And that’s a disappointment.
Where are you seeing women being blamed and bashed? Just have a re-read of this article, for example, and you will see that Tom is talking of people in general - not just women - who favour women. It is a human condition. Nobody is bashing women. There is implied criticism of the systems that favour women without giving men any favours but (as we are often reminded) it is men who are the majority in such systems.
That'd be meminism.
The equal and opposite reaction.
Lincoln’s letter to Lydia Bixby who lost sons in the civil war....Rudyard Kiplings son Jack, whom he forced to go, was only 18 when he was killed at Loos WWI. Vera Brittain Testament of Youth fame wrote of losing the man she loved in that war too...I’m not sure women suffer more though because those husbands and sons endure horrors beyond words and often suffer endlessly unless they find healing..we have to work together to end all this horror this blood sacrifice to moloch and baal.
Women are disgusted by a weak man.
They evolved as war brides to immediately imprint on the new conquerors as bas boys.
Alpha windowing is inhibited by a fallen patriarch.
That’s your story and you’re sticking to it. Anyway ...
Hilary Clinton said women are most affected by war because they lose their husbands and sons.
Gamma bias.
Birkenhead protocol.
Most men in history did not reproduce, they were the slaves and soldiers.
Men would be vigilant if walking about with a bundle of cash. Women are vigilant as they walk around with a baby maker and golden vagina.
Vagina is Latin for scabbard, i.e. a sword sheath.
The women who were overt and truthful did not pass their genes on in sufficient numbers. The deceitful women acquired beta male resources and alpha male genetics.
Today, state sponsored gamma bias protects and validates womens deceit of mass paternity discrepancy.
One third of women have killed a child.
One third of court ordered paternity tests come back negative.
Women have majority Suffrage and votes for more taxes because only men are net tax payers as a group and only women are net lifetime welfare recipients as a group.
The central pillar of the welfare industrial complex is child support. Enforced by an unconstitutional court applying an unconscionable contract. The state pays women to discard men, retaining sexual access to his wallet, while reserving her vagina for other men.
Several billion children have been killed by their mothers since infanticide was legalized around 1970 and pushed globally.
Women show no contrition or repentance.
Didn’t those one third and several billion babies killed by their mothers have fathers? Noticeably absent? Kissinger, the de pop king, is responsible for a lot of this actually including over four hundred million forced abortions in China. De pop and second wave feminism are massive psy ops for, and from, the globalists. All the real conspiracy theories germ gene virus that supports vaxx theory and Freudianism claptrap helps sustain it all including trans theory. Not to mention Darwin bringing up the rear. These real conspiracy theories are simple to see because they all lead to nihilism. Divorce etc is a direct result from all this, the charge being led by CIA asset, and false prophetess, Gloria Steinem. By the way stats can be massaged to produce any outcome one wants. It was one of Churchill’s, another globalist and lover of the Great Game, fav tools to con the public with. One third of women in the USA have been sexually abused. Add that to your stat list. Eve was a remarkable, wise woman and did what was essential to get you here. American Military men have the biggest reputation for financial abuse of their wives. It is rampant. And I am very well acquainted with it. I know of one woman married for 36 years five children that let the ex keep it all. And there was a fat purse. He loved money above everything else so she allowed him to keep it. All. I would say, on the whole, that we have created this mess together. No Shiva without Shakti.
I can’t read that wall of text.
I feel like I have been mobbed.
Please DO try to be concise.
Say it slower so he can follow Janice.
Try climbing up.
See? It didn't hurt now did it?
Stick to the facts. Ad hominem attacks aren’t useful.
You're hurting my feelings.
Who hurt you?
Please add the statistics for how often violence is perpetuated toward a woman by a man. And how many men in how many men kill a child. The stats you pointed out were true ish....you can't leave out data simoly.because it doesn't fit into your extremist views.
Women kill more innocent babies in the womb than die from all other causes combined.
This is a pre-meditated violent crime.
The scale is equivalent to ten holocausts per year and has killed several billion people so far.
An organism in utero is not a person. THE only one experiencing the violence and trauma iS the women in your scenario.
I am getting "your body, my choice vibes off of this convo. If that is your worldview, I will disengage. I have to protect my energy.
The womb is a safe space.
Turning it into a tomb, and killing field, is a satanic inversion.
Today, 200,000 children will suffer infanticide from their mothers, before baptism.
Only 185,000 deaths from other causes such as disease or age or accident.
Your body your choice doesn't stop your mother having you crushed and poisoned to death.
You are just a clump of cells.
Stop taxing me to fund your mass killing and welfare.
I read what you are saying SOLEY to remind me of why feminism is just as necessary now as it has ever been. It is obvious to me that you are-A-a man, B-You consume news and "facts" that stay with your beliefs and dont bother with the other side. Banning abortion is about so much more than "women murdering babies".
My next point-"taxing" you? Please look into "pink tax" and see the numbers there. Most of that money goes toward protection for women from men.
My final point is that I dont have the time or patience or will to explain all the ways that if you do not possess a uterus, or higher education on said female organs, you should really not have the majority of the say over them. (Them meaning uteruses collectively)
Men are the only group of net lifetime tax payers.
Women have majority Suffrage.
Today, a couple hundred thousand babies were painfully chased around with metal tools, dismembered, poisoned, and left for dead. It is a crying shame. How many vegan mothers did this?
Women have beat the drum for "equality" my entire life - and of course, well before that - so perhaps, while taking into account real sex differences, there should be what Bill Maher might call, "new rules."
1) If the US military draft is revived, then make it universal:
- both men and women
- exceptions for pregnancy or with children
- no combat roles for women in areas where direct physical confrontation is likely, i.e. infantry. Anything else is on the table - pilot, sailor, etc.
2) Complete revamping of all "family law" in all states
- since the marriage contract is just that, breaking it requires demonstration of fault - i.e., eliminate no-fault divorce. Infidelity, financial profligacy, abuse, etc. are grounds. Whoever files bears the burden of proving fault.
- no automatic preference for either parent in child custody
- automatic DNA testing of all newborns, with failure automatic grounds for divorce
- adopt Virginia's family law on assets: any asset that you did not actively manage during the marriage, whether passively managed (i.e. index funds) or managed by third party, remains with that partner in divorce. (That one is near and dear to my divorced little heart, LOL)
Do these things and men will start taking on marriage again. Fail to do so, and the consequences are left to the reader to calculate.
The phrase “But the women and children!" carries obvious moral weight because they are weaker and more vulnerable. This means they require defense - by men. And from an evolutionary perspective it is those mothers who will carry on the future generations.
There was an interview series of soldiers before going into battle in Korea. They had accepted that they could die. What bothered them was the possibility of never becoming fathers. I think it says a lot when fatherhood itself today can be dismissed as optional.
Unfortunately, it's as simple as it's irrevocable.
Biology drives culture & culture drives politics.
The very simple fact is that women are born with circa 300 eggs while men produce 250,000 a pop.
Women are biologically precious and homo sapiens has evolved to treat them as such. That's why protecting women feels natural.
Many MRAs are trying to swing the pendulum the other way, but is an uphill task.
I salute Tom for his mighty efforts.
Thanks Michael.
Home sapiens 😎
Yet another great article, Tom! Well reasoned, concise, irrefutable.... except by feminists everywhere!
Thank you Stephen!
In my 20s, I was keen to discover what it meant to belong to the gender that feminists claimed was oppressing the female gender.
There was always a feeling that something was not quite correct about the claims feminists were making
.
Why Men Are the Way They Are (1986): I eagerly read this book, only it was convoluted and obtuse in its coverage of Issues that men experience. I thought it was a foundation for further in-depth exploration of the issues men were experiencing.
Most importantly, Farrell admitted that he finally started to hear what men were saying.
At the time, I thought that men would learn to identify and, more importantly, articulate the issues they were experiencing.
Little did I realise that the feminist overseers want only approved feminist approaches to men's groups awareness and consciousness raising exercise, comparing notes on how badly the female gender was treating them was not encouraged and actively discouraged.
The identification of female abusers was effectively shut down in the public sphere, as Erin Pizzey and other honest researchers into Domestic Violence found out.
As usual, thought provoking.
Thank you Lea.
💯 well said and true.
The main problem with 'women and children first' is that women have applied it in that order...
On the Titanic 74% of the women survived, but only 52% of the children. And 20% of the men. The men prioritised the women and children, the women did not do the same.
Here is Australia that mentality is still found in emergencies, from the response to Cyclone Tracy to the evacuation of Wuhan.
"When men suffer, it feels unfortunate."
Not unfortunate...rather "expected and planned."
A space for men. Thank you.
I have to ask. If you are a proponent for gamma bias, it tells me that you believe that women have NOT suffered (historically) disproportionately to men? You dont see a real patriarchy? Men have suffered just as much as women? I am not trying to argue with you, I am genuinely curious because this.ganma bias thing is something I thought was made up. Like the flat earthers...
Also, Birkenhead Protocol is just that a "protocol", a social construct. Maritime law says let's save everyone!! And thats LAW
Very well said. I appreciate what you are pointing out. I had always thought, "well someone has to have the babies and the kids can grow up to take the place of the men that went last" I truly had never thought about men as expandable. Of course I've never been faced with a disaster in which this was something to be decided. I have always said the same about the draft. If all genders can enlist, all genders should be eligible to draft.
As you said, I understand the logic behind women and children first, and as a feminist it makes me uncomfortable to think that while attempting to destroy the patriarchy, women have made men feel, as you said, expendable.
I struggle with being a feminist that likes to have the door pened for me amd doesnt hate me. Shortly therr is a happy medium?
In response to a feminist post of F/B, I asked the question, "If men have all the power, why do women make the Rules?" To say the least, the responses were very hostile.
Looking for examples to support the above supposition, I totally forgot about the book title "The Rules.
After being tarred and feathered, keelhauled, figuratively castrated and labelled a Neanderthal and that I am crazy and in need of some therapy. Below is a summary of my response.
“The Rules” was a book written by two women, Ellen Fein and Sherrie Schneider first published in 1995.
Quote<“ The book suggests gendered dating rules that a woman should follow in order to attract and marry the man of her dreams; these rules include that a woman should be "easy to be with but hard to get".[3] The underlying philosophy of The Rules is that women should not aggressively pursue men, but rather, should encourage the men to pursue them.>Unquote.
Three years later, in 1998, Jack Kammer asked this question.“If men have all the Power, how come women make the rules?”
That question was asked by Kammer, and, in an attempt to explore the issue, he wrote and published a book titled after it.
It is clear from the responses that it was very triggering for some people.
The book was labelled as a Conspiracy and Misogynistic by Eric Keenlyside.
Eileen Tenore wrote, “Get some therapy now. Before you escalate”.
Chrystal Shaffer wrote, “I love it when the low IQ Neanderthals crawl out of their dumpster fires A. you provide so much entertainment”.
L B Ammon wrote, “people who say this usually mean something like "why don't I have unrestricted access to a woman's body?". Is that what you mean?”
The above personal attacks demonstrate not only bullying but total intolerance to exploring alternative ideas or concepts that may challenge existing belief systems.
If you get the chance to look at my blog on the topic of child online safety and help amplify it would really mean the world.
The algorithm doesn't tend to assist such topics and I feel it would really suit your audience in the parenting realm.