As I mentioned in “Comments”, in a similar, previous Article: “False Accusation is the worst crime in the book!”. There is NOTHING more dastardly, than sending an innocent person to Prison!”
Another motivation is *retaliation* for unwelcome approaches by males. Some women can't just say 'no' or let down a man softly, but *have to* falsely accuse of SA in order to "put him in his place".
I've seen that. Quite a bit. If it is Tom Cruise she is flattered, if it is Tom anybodyelse he is harrassing her. Taking the risk of approaching women is bad enough but this makes it totally dangerous.
Feminists have been weaponising women for years as their hatred of men knows no bounds and false rape claims are just another tool along with the recent addition of the ridiculous coercive control to their arsenal. False claims should be treated as the serious crime they are because of their destructive aftermath but instead they proliferate and go unpunished. Whether this study was old or small it was still interesting thanks Tom.
The irony here is that we are supposed to believe all women without question, but when women get caught lying and start to be truthful about their lie...THEN we are allowed to disbelieve them because they are operating under some sort of alternative motivation. The reality is that false accusations of rape and harassment are so rampant that they, in academia at least, they are the MAJORITY of complaints rising above 95% in the words of a family friend who worked in a local college's Title IX office for 20 years. Women as a group know full well that a huge number of these complaints are false, but few will stand up for the integrity of the legal system or the rights of the falsely accused because they want the unjust "benefits" that this weaponized feminism gives to women as a group. We need a Defense Against False Accusations act which would REQUIRE any person making an allegation of harassment or rape to have their case brought to the courts with full naming of the accuser, her witnesses and her advocates disclosed to the public on a permanently open website. Accusers who fail to prove their case to the highest legal standard should face the maximum penalty that the accused would have faced as well as the maximum penalty for perjury. Any counselor or lawyer acting on her behalf would face the same penalty as any other person who aids and abets a crime would. If this makes it harder for actual victims of rape and harassment to come forward...so be it. Women have demonstrated that they cannot be trusted to use the power to accuse responsibly and must pay the price.
I have run into a culture, apparently born of feminist and women's support groups, where any unexpected romp, consensual or intoxicated or both, should be translated into a rape accusation. I have been in a couple of situations where I was less than closemouthed about something that happened, and then found myself being hectored into going to the police and a lawyer and reporting it as a RAPE. I've been more discreet since. What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.
In addition to all the harm done to the innocent, these false accusers take away resources from actual crimes. There needs to be the political will to go after false accusers.
I believe that false accusations are easily uttered, because women think men are strong and it would not harm them too much, but they should get a lesson. Also, due to the physical inferiority in strength, social shaming / asking for help has always been the women's preferred way of 'defense'. A third aspect might be the impulsive rage, that might be stronger with women.
Please visit THE INTERNATIONAL FALSE RAPE TIMELINE and send me links/details to any cases not included. You will also find a page that covers motives for false rape allegations.
Feminists will tell you that women never lie about rape and then turn right around and tell you that any woman who says she wasn't raped is lying because they're afraid or ashamed to come forward. When women recant their allegations and charges are dropped, they count that as an unprosecuted allegation. That's how much they trust women.
Joseph Neuberger talks about conducting research into this very subject in one of his videos he starts to mention what he beleive to be the percentage of false allegations, but YouTube deleted that part of the video.
Bane666au did on youtube an extensive analysis on false/true allegations detailing the stages of the accusation reported, reported to the police, going through court with all the outcomes of proven, to be true proven to be false, or unknown,.
Overall it was 3% of cases proven to be true and 4% proven to be false. The remaining was unknown.
I can really recommend his video on this. Bane put alot of time into this and unfortunately, he has become inactive for some time now.
My 43 year old son was falsely accused of sexual assault in a small community in Canada. It ruined his career. He was suicidal. He was evicted along with his minor son. The woman is mentally ill and has an extensive history of falsely accusing men. None of which was allowed as evidence in court. She was found not credible. She still tells everyone he was found guilty. No consequences at all for her. She has since told many locals that his lawyer tried to crawl into her second story apartment to sexually assault her! I am a Me Too survivor and it infuriates me that false sexual assault accusations are believed with no evidence and no consequences for the perpetrator.
Until lying females are charged with the exact amount of jail time that the would-be rapist would have absolutely nothing will change. Writing about it, talking about it, bringing it up, blah blah blah! The insanity continues unabated! The completely corrupted courts love the continued business!
Most times these toxic feminist getaway absolutely Scott-free and are released (encouraged) to go out and find their next victim.
Ask yourself why that is, and why men allow this to continue KNOWING they may be next only God knows.
Regarding the ugly side of feminism and the necessity to trust the woman, we also must not overlook father’s rights in divorce cases. I know many men that the courts have just ignored or whose judgements were quite punitive based solely on the wives’ positions without taking any account to the fathers’ perspective, justifications for wanting his kids, etc. One friend commited suicide because the allegations were so wrong and his voice was ignored by the court and he couldn’t see his kids. Another friend has not seen his daughter in person in nearly 20 years. She is now 22 and has no idea what a superb and faithful human being her dad is b/c her mom has poisoned that opportunity for her to know and th courts backed her (long family and community connections to the judge as well). The courts have long been tipped against fathers for 50 years but nothing is done to address this.
This piece fails to address other significant critiques of Kanin's study, particularly of *how* he measured false allegations, and repeats his statistic despite lengthy criticisms of this and other work. I've summarised recent scholarly work on false accusations here: https://xyonline.net/content/false-allegations-sexual-and-domestic-violence-facts, with links to the full scholarly papers. The evidence is that most allegations of domestic and sexual violence are made in good faith and false allegations are rare. Sincerely, Professor Michael Flood
So you want people to ignore the real stories of real women falsely accusing innocent men 41% of the time? I think those days are over. People are waking up to the gynocentric academic dinosaur enabling. Thank goodness!
Tom, I doubt this was real Michael Flood. I think this was a troll to - let's say - spice up the conversation. If this was real Michael Flood, I suggest him to contact you via email, confirming his post here and I would really enjoy a 1:1 conversation between you and him.
That was the real Flood. I could tell from the substack data. I doubt he wants an extended conversation. I am guessing he knows he is on a sinking ship that is losing ground on a daily basis. Thank goodness. It's the Kanin study that got him upset. lol
As I mentioned in “Comments”, in a similar, previous Article: “False Accusation is the worst crime in the book!”. There is NOTHING more dastardly, than sending an innocent person to Prison!”
Another motivation is *retaliation* for unwelcome approaches by males. Some women can't just say 'no' or let down a man softly, but *have to* falsely accuse of SA in order to "put him in his place".
I've seen that. Quite a bit. If it is Tom Cruise she is flattered, if it is Tom anybodyelse he is harrassing her. Taking the risk of approaching women is bad enough but this makes it totally dangerous.
Feminists have been weaponising women for years as their hatred of men knows no bounds and false rape claims are just another tool along with the recent addition of the ridiculous coercive control to their arsenal. False claims should be treated as the serious crime they are because of their destructive aftermath but instead they proliferate and go unpunished. Whether this study was old or small it was still interesting thanks Tom.
You are welcome Lea.
The irony here is that we are supposed to believe all women without question, but when women get caught lying and start to be truthful about their lie...THEN we are allowed to disbelieve them because they are operating under some sort of alternative motivation. The reality is that false accusations of rape and harassment are so rampant that they, in academia at least, they are the MAJORITY of complaints rising above 95% in the words of a family friend who worked in a local college's Title IX office for 20 years. Women as a group know full well that a huge number of these complaints are false, but few will stand up for the integrity of the legal system or the rights of the falsely accused because they want the unjust "benefits" that this weaponized feminism gives to women as a group. We need a Defense Against False Accusations act which would REQUIRE any person making an allegation of harassment or rape to have their case brought to the courts with full naming of the accuser, her witnesses and her advocates disclosed to the public on a permanently open website. Accusers who fail to prove their case to the highest legal standard should face the maximum penalty that the accused would have faced as well as the maximum penalty for perjury. Any counselor or lawyer acting on her behalf would face the same penalty as any other person who aids and abets a crime would. If this makes it harder for actual victims of rape and harassment to come forward...so be it. Women have demonstrated that they cannot be trusted to use the power to accuse responsibly and must pay the price.
We have gotten to the point where bullies are believed and showered with protections. Go figure.
I have run into a culture, apparently born of feminist and women's support groups, where any unexpected romp, consensual or intoxicated or both, should be translated into a rape accusation. I have been in a couple of situations where I was less than closemouthed about something that happened, and then found myself being hectored into going to the police and a lawyer and reporting it as a RAPE. I've been more discreet since. What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.
In addition to all the harm done to the innocent, these false accusers take away resources from actual crimes. There needs to be the political will to go after false accusers.
So true. Thank you.
I believe that false accusations are easily uttered, because women think men are strong and it would not harm them too much, but they should get a lesson. Also, due to the physical inferiority in strength, social shaming / asking for help has always been the women's preferred way of 'defense'. A third aspect might be the impulsive rage, that might be stronger with women.
Please visit THE INTERNATIONAL FALSE RAPE TIMELINE and send me links/details to any cases not included. You will also find a page that covers motives for false rape allegations.
Feminists will tell you that women never lie about rape and then turn right around and tell you that any woman who says she wasn't raped is lying because they're afraid or ashamed to come forward. When women recant their allegations and charges are dropped, they count that as an unprosecuted allegation. That's how much they trust women.
LOL! They don't lie about being raped but, well, they might not be so honest about not being raped....and that is ok. Good point!
Joseph Neuberger talks about conducting research into this very subject in one of his videos he starts to mention what he beleive to be the percentage of false allegations, but YouTube deleted that part of the video.
I'll see if I can find it.
Bane666au did on youtube an extensive analysis on false/true allegations detailing the stages of the accusation reported, reported to the police, going through court with all the outcomes of proven, to be true proven to be false, or unknown,.
Overall it was 3% of cases proven to be true and 4% proven to be false. The remaining was unknown.
I can really recommend his video on this. Bane put alot of time into this and unfortunately, he has become inactive for some time now.
My 43 year old son was falsely accused of sexual assault in a small community in Canada. It ruined his career. He was suicidal. He was evicted along with his minor son. The woman is mentally ill and has an extensive history of falsely accusing men. None of which was allowed as evidence in court. She was found not credible. She still tells everyone he was found guilty. No consequences at all for her. She has since told many locals that his lawyer tried to crawl into her second story apartment to sexually assault her! I am a Me Too survivor and it infuriates me that false sexual assault accusations are believed with no evidence and no consequences for the perpetrator.
Go talk to your sisters about it; they don’t give a shit what any man has to say….
Until lying females are charged with the exact amount of jail time that the would-be rapist would have absolutely nothing will change. Writing about it, talking about it, bringing it up, blah blah blah! The insanity continues unabated! The completely corrupted courts love the continued business!
Most times these toxic feminist getaway absolutely Scott-free and are released (encouraged) to go out and find their next victim.
Ask yourself why that is, and why men allow this to continue KNOWING they may be next only God knows.
Regarding the ugly side of feminism and the necessity to trust the woman, we also must not overlook father’s rights in divorce cases. I know many men that the courts have just ignored or whose judgements were quite punitive based solely on the wives’ positions without taking any account to the fathers’ perspective, justifications for wanting his kids, etc. One friend commited suicide because the allegations were so wrong and his voice was ignored by the court and he couldn’t see his kids. Another friend has not seen his daughter in person in nearly 20 years. She is now 22 and has no idea what a superb and faithful human being her dad is b/c her mom has poisoned that opportunity for her to know and th courts backed her (long family and community connections to the judge as well). The courts have long been tipped against fathers for 50 years but nothing is done to address this.
This piece fails to address other significant critiques of Kanin's study, particularly of *how* he measured false allegations, and repeats his statistic despite lengthy criticisms of this and other work. I've summarised recent scholarly work on false accusations here: https://xyonline.net/content/false-allegations-sexual-and-domestic-violence-facts, with links to the full scholarly papers. The evidence is that most allegations of domestic and sexual violence are made in good faith and false allegations are rare. Sincerely, Professor Michael Flood
So you want people to ignore the real stories of real women falsely accusing innocent men 41% of the time? I think those days are over. People are waking up to the gynocentric academic dinosaur enabling. Thank goodness!
Tom, I doubt this was real Michael Flood. I think this was a troll to - let's say - spice up the conversation. If this was real Michael Flood, I suggest him to contact you via email, confirming his post here and I would really enjoy a 1:1 conversation between you and him.
That was the real Flood. I could tell from the substack data. I doubt he wants an extended conversation. I am guessing he knows he is on a sinking ship that is losing ground on a daily basis. Thank goodness. It's the Kanin study that got him upset. lol
A non-feminists study is not backing up feminist theories ? Shocker!
And even if it was rare (which is not), then should we ignore the issue?
I mean most people die a natural death without being murdered. Why prosecute murder when it is so rare?
Yesterday I just read this:
'Those who live by lies need to fear the truth.'
Interesting.
And I am not holding my breath to when it comes to a real conversation.
“Evidence“ in a criminals mind, is anything they decide to say!
Do you really think we’re that stupid here? 🤨