Maybe get Bezos, Gates, Musk the divorce raped billionaires to add a safety net. Put bachelor apartments in metros. Let the divorce raped men serve as monks for a couple of years while they get back on their feet.
Throw in some remasculization rites for the first two weeks of crisis when the state sponsored betrayal / struggle sessions kick in.
Let them use Grok for legal support and 0.001% of Amazon's charitable donations to civil rights for families.
Like how the patriarch in a Jewish house hold reads the holy book to everyone at the table.
He has a role. Like the pole holding up the tent of the family. Everyone is around him being guided as to history, morality, and tradition.
We aren't providers anymore.
Maybe we should abolish female providers by inventing even more production, GDP, and abundance from new energy and decentralised production like 3D printers and automated scientists and professionals from agentic AI.
"Maybe granting men a vital role." Men do indeed require what I call a "healthy identity," which does indeed depend on making at least one contribution to society, one that is (a) distinctive (women can't do it), (b) necessary (some people must do it) and publicly valued (it earns collective respect). I keep saying this, Conrad, and you're among the few people who get it.
The only problem is that this "vital role" cannot simply be "granted" like a student loan or conferred like a diploma. Nor can it be created expediently but artificially as a therapeutic measure. It must emerge self-evidently and inarguably as a given of the human condition--that is, from the existential need of every society. I think that there is a possibility, one that is currently "hiding in plain sight."
As you say, women (either alone or with help from the state) can protect and provide for themselves. That's not going to change in the foreseeable future. But fatherhood, in my opinion, is one thing that no woman can do (not even with help from the state), because fathers are not assistant mothers. As Tom Golden says (with an increasing number of others), "Mothers raise infants; fathers raise adults."
For over half a century, however, feminists have contradicted themselves by undermining not only motherhood (in the name of liberation for women to build "careers") but also fatherhood (in the name of "single mothers by choice"). As a result, fathers have become walking wallets at best and "deadbeat dads" or even potential molesters at worst. Restoring fathers to their central role in family life will require a major cultural effort.
This is a significant talent and strength you have, Tom, to take these generic theories and apply them to men and feminism in a systematic, detailed way. Well done.
THIS is a great summary. While most of us can (and have repeatedly) regurgitated most of this list, it's great to have it in one place to help doubters with an overview. THANKS!
Thanks for this, Tom. Been reading you for a long time.
I have a criticism though. What put feminist ideology on this horrific path? I say it's the Marxism and Postmodernism that did it.
Look at Judith Butler's Gender Trouble, the bible of radical gender ideology. It's driven by Critical Theory and Postmodern ideas about discourse. Earlier feminists were fans of the French revolution, socialism and then Marx, and the 'struggle' was seen as part of overthrowing oppression by aristocrats and evil capitalists.
But you don't mention any of this. To me it's the ultimate cause of how this became so radical and pernicious.
I agree with you. All you need to do is look at the money to see who was funding feminism from the beginning and you find it was not only the govt but orgs like Rockefeller or Ford. Not even close to being a grass roots movement though the mythology claims it is. People are slowly waking to the dark side of feminism. Eventually we will get to the puppet masters.
My biggest concern is the welfare of men and I try to keep that as my theme.
It would be generous to say that these tactics against men are not intentional ("now being used — intentionally or not — against men"). They are, as DC notes below, systematic, not accidental. It is very useful to have these strategies listed and spelled out so that men, if they choose, can fight a system with a systematic tool. When I bring up some of these points, male friends often downplay them and even say that unfairness and outright discrimination are chances for us to man up. Too many men believe that it is their role to sacrifice, go the extra mile--put it however you like. These men believe that we have to be fair but don't need to be fairly treated, as if demanding fairness were somehow asking for a privilege. An excellent, informative, inspiring post. Thanks, Tom.
One way that men have to fight back is to resist the tendency to make sacrifices for women. Frankly, we need to treat them as toxic unless and until they show us proper dignity and respect. As with men who behave badly, we have no obligation to women whether to serve or sacrifice for them. If that leaves them in bad circumstances of their own making...too bad.
I wish I could John. He's 99 years old and I am not sure he is interested in being interviewed but you never know. I will poke around a bit and see. He called all of this many years ago. It would be interesting to hear his take on our present mess.
This article is a very accurate description of the situation Western society finds itself in. One question it doesn't answer is how it came to be that so many women seem to fall so easily into these nasty, seemingly unethical ways of manipulating others. The reality is that the coercive system of control in place is an extension of the manner in which women have always bullied others in society when men do not retain a firm hand and enforce social morays against bad behavior. If you doubt this, ask yourself where you see such bullying on a regular basis? Hint: Look at the behavior of teenage women against others. The problem is that women seem to be inherently prone to these types of social systems....validating societal systems to LIMIT the power and voices of women when they misbehave in this way.
Feminism is anti male hatred and bullying, what ever men do women always blame us, i would love women to have the privileges men have, such as the men being killed fighting in Ukraine, and men who suffer rejection from women so that we suffer depression and are added to a list of people at risk of suicide which is what' s happened to me, women insult lonely men by calling us incel's , yet women have the luxury of being approached by men , taken on a date , every thing paid for, women can get as much sex as they want and get paid for it. Governments only help women, its a matriarchy where the victims are the ones being demonised by privileged women who are so spoiled and blameless they actualy believe men have it better. what hypocrites women are.
Family is seen as black (not red) and Marx's call to 'aufheben die Familie' (abolish the family) is enacted.
Chinese boys of a certain age were taught 《爹亲娘亲不如毛主席亲》in school, meaning Dear Dad and Dear Mum aren't as good as Chairman Mao's dearness. Or Mao is better than Mum and Dad. Leading to cultural revolution killing tens of millions.
Struggle sessions are 批斗 or 'wholesale bullying' short for 批判斗争” or 'judgement beatings'. They were even held in stadiums. Dengxiao Ping was marched down the street in a dunce hat for his right roading a few years before he assumed control of the party.
Re-education is 洗脑 literally washing brains. It still goes on in the 劳改 network of reform through labour camps. And local black prisons where you're trapped in a steel seat and berated until you sign a confession etc. They even tie it in with a social credit score.
It's not too strong to say this is actual evil. The playbook of leftists has escaped all reasonable bounds. Repressive tolerance has stripped us of redress. But at some point their birth rate of minus 50% per generation will cause a policy response.
However, there is nuance. Feminism in China is under party control. It's actually extremely unfeminist. And recent family law reforms in China might appear reasonable, if revolutionary. And could solve our problems.
In China, the kidnapping parent, usually the mother. Is immediately stripped of custody. We'd call her the resident parent in England or the accuser in US. The judge who innovated this was killed extra judicially by her 'customers' but then it was picked up as new state law. They use the continental system relying on written law there, not English law where you make it up as you go along applying case law.
You can't anymore expropriate your spouses assets either. Nor your in-laws assets. And houses belong to who bought them irrespective of title. So it bans gold digging retrospectively.
Come to think of it. China doesn't have REMO reciprocity to auto enslave men through child support or spousal maintenance. But Hongkong does.
Is China becoming a human rights bright spot for family law?
"But at some point their birth rate of minus 50% per generation will cause a policy response."
It already has! It's called mass immigration. Mostly from Muslim countries who don't tolerate feminism. And since Muslim women greatly outbreed Western women, feminism will disappear in a few generations. Feminism is self-limiting, because it destroys the host population, by destroying reproduction. The future of the West is Muslim, it's a mathematical certainty.
I genuinely would like to know more about the "intersection" of feminism and Islam.
Can Islam stand against postmodernity?
I very much doubt it.
Although Pakistan is targeting a population greater than half a billion by the end of the century. Won't they start demanding welfare to feed single mothers? If not, why not. Or simply migrate else where and start becoming feminist. Or intensify abortion.
The feminists never figured that one. By discouraging women from reproducing our population will wither and vanish to be replaced by third world baby producers. Some utopia.
The Left, unfortunately, has no monopoly on brainwashing techniques. Another example would have been Nazi Germany, when children were trained in school and in compulsory youth organizations for both boys and girls to believe that no one superseded the Leader in wisdom or authority, not even their own parents--and, as religious parents soon found out, not even God. As a result, parents worried, with good reason, that their own children might betray them for disobedience to the Nazi party or disloyalty to the Aryan race (let alone for hiding Jews or helping dissidents). As a result, many parents ended up colluding in private with teachers and other authority figures (along with propaganda) in brainwashing the nation.
The Nazis did not use brainwashing techniques. Brainwashing was unknown during WWII. Brainwashing techniques were developed by communist regimes during the Cold War, and only came to Western attention through the work of Lifton and Biderman in the late 1950's. For example Biderman's Chart of Coercion published in 1957 identified eight specific methods employed by Chinese communist forces to brainwash captured US pilots during the Korean War: Isolation; Monopolization of perception; Induced debilitation and exhaustion; Threats; Occasional indulgences; Demonstrating "omnipotence" and "omniscience"; Degradation; Enforcing trivial demands. German schoolchildren and Hitler Youth were not subjected to these techniques. They were subjected to propaganda, not brainwashing. In the context of this article it's an important distinction.
"...the family courts don’t just separate fathers from their children — they separate men from their dignity and their purpose..."
Great phrasing and good to read an acknowledgement of that part of social engineering.
This is not only in the USA. By my experience, in the UK, too. By what I have heard running a forum where many expressed their angst and bewilderment (having assumed that justice would prevail) it happens across huge areas of the world, too.
Meanwhile, the statistical evidence continues to build of the problems caused in society by children not having dad at home.
This is a weak spot in the feminist Marxist edifice.
Most men don't believe it exists.
It's too evil to accept.
So spreading information would potentially enable it's down fall. It would only take restoration of principles of law such as fairness, considering everyone's interests, due process, natural rights, and constitutional law. It'll be just the stroke of a pen when it happens.
Right now we raise a brigade of new converts every day when USAs family courts hear 10,000 cases. At least 5,000 new men are inducted into the two tier injustice clown universe of "family law". They'll be mad, some won't make it, but many ultimately will accept reality.
I publicly argue that anyone that separates or actively supports such separation of fathers-children or parents-children should be publicly killed along with every one that hired or professionally supports them or connected to them along with all older adults in all their bloodlines.
It would require a bullet in my brain to change my mind, and frankly that would be somewhat better than this Hell with so many insane evil Feminized vile putrid demonic-possessed forms called from the pits of Hell and wrapped in human skin.
Of course, when I am Rightly and Justly Pope-King of the world, I (we) will serve and shape the world out of Hell and into God's Grace and Love as He walks or gardens or dances or .. with us all though our days of Meaning, as we serve and finely Enthrone Truth, Justice, Order, Charity, Love, .. in my place at our death.
--
One of the best solutions to this Synagogue of Satan Witch controlled hell would be to discover those 15 or so most powerful international interconnected families that rule with Satanic help all the world and us peoples, and order families by power, greatest on top, by using NSA and other 5-eyes.
Include not less than 3 levels down their webs of Witches' control network that serve them and at lowest level have minions in our families and workplaces and powerful institutions etc.
Make public the most powerful family's adult members, and command them to rule us all - in public to improve the least of us the most, and all of us more by growing and spreading truth, justice, order, Joy, Love, Meaning, .. and every 6 months everyone polled world-wide, and if 2 consecutive 6-months periods with poor betterment metrics then the entire family's blood-line adults will be publicly hanged, and the 2nd most powerful family taken over.
This is Just because they have been ruling for centuries, serving Satan in the Dark. They want power and to rule, okay, they get it and must do it well - or die in public hanging over the corpses of their entire bloodline adults.
Seem Just?
Do we hope for a future we can raise big loving families in? Well then, .. I offer my service to us all;
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2211:, 16th May 2025, Proposal and Apologetic; I should be Accepted as world Pope-King, How and Why..."
This essay could well be your best ever, Tom, except that a few of your recent ones have met the same very high standard. You get an A+ for insight and clarity.
Of great importance is your willingness to add a specifically moral vocabulary to the usual psychological one. What we need so desperately is not so much group therapy, I think, but also moral reawakening. To regain moral stamina would mean recovering a specifically moral sensibility. No academic jargon can replace that.
Hatred is inherently evil, for instance, not merely ignorant or delusional or counterproductive (let alone something like "unnatural"). And unlike the ideologues, I suggest that its origin is not only "out there" with "them" but also "in here" within "us."
As it happens, we still have at our disposal (although we won't have it for long if we succumb to collective amnesia) is a moral vocabulary that has emerged over countless generations either through interpreting divine revelation (according to religious people) or through trial and error (according to secular people). No matter what its original context, the "golden rule" self-evidently makes moral sense as the bottom line for communal life at any time and in any place. No society can endure, in fact, unless everyone can agree on the need to "Do unto others ..." or "Do not do unto others ..." (or both). This is the sine qua non for any notion of fairness or justice and therefore our ultimate weapon in defense of our civilization (or any civilization) against any ideology--including feminism and its current allies.
After my dream-job as a basic medical science researcher at a University and in a building, I was warned was packed with vicious man-hating psychotic back-stabbing lying Witch-Whisper-Web secrete coordinating unJust reputational destroying Love-Joy-Life-Hope soul-murdering demonic-forms wrapped in female skin .. well, I was warned that I would be targeted for being a white Christian-virtue value-raised intelligent open social able helpful hard-working critical employee surrounded by meritless-retarded Affirmative-Action productivity-destroying resent-filled women ..
.. I could not imagine anyone targeting me or having a problem I could not work-with others to fix.
Well, Dream-Job turned into a Toxic feminized insane baby-murdering psychotic Hell-hole.
Now each time I hear of a school, workplace, or public shooting I wonder it he killed the Witch and her coven and minions, and wonder why they aren't happening much more often.
Well done, brother! I like the way you breakdown the "systemic" oppression of men.
One more think I've noticed when talking about men's challenges us that there's often pushback that blames men's behavior.
- Suicide: that's men hurting themselves;
- High rates of workplace fatalities: men being reckless;
- Boys doing poorly in school: they need to learn to behave themselves.
feminists use tactics to make boys fail, it was done deliberately.
So how can we fix suicide?
Maybe get Bezos, Gates, Musk the divorce raped billionaires to add a safety net. Put bachelor apartments in metros. Let the divorce raped men serve as monks for a couple of years while they get back on their feet.
Throw in some remasculization rites for the first two weeks of crisis when the state sponsored betrayal / struggle sessions kick in.
Let them use Grok for legal support and 0.001% of Amazon's charitable donations to civil rights for families.
"So how can we fix suicide?"
Care about it. Individually, of course, but as a society.
Until enough people in enough institutions bother to care about men, we won't solve the problem.
This disposablity needs a remedy.
Maybe granting men a vital role.
Like how the patriarch in a Jewish house hold reads the holy book to everyone at the table.
He has a role. Like the pole holding up the tent of the family. Everyone is around him being guided as to history, morality, and tradition.
We aren't providers anymore.
Maybe we should abolish female providers by inventing even more production, GDP, and abundance from new energy and decentralised production like 3D printers and automated scientists and professionals from agentic AI.
"Maybe granting men a vital role." Men do indeed require what I call a "healthy identity," which does indeed depend on making at least one contribution to society, one that is (a) distinctive (women can't do it), (b) necessary (some people must do it) and publicly valued (it earns collective respect). I keep saying this, Conrad, and you're among the few people who get it.
The only problem is that this "vital role" cannot simply be "granted" like a student loan or conferred like a diploma. Nor can it be created expediently but artificially as a therapeutic measure. It must emerge self-evidently and inarguably as a given of the human condition--that is, from the existential need of every society. I think that there is a possibility, one that is currently "hiding in plain sight."
As you say, women (either alone or with help from the state) can protect and provide for themselves. That's not going to change in the foreseeable future. But fatherhood, in my opinion, is one thing that no woman can do (not even with help from the state), because fathers are not assistant mothers. As Tom Golden says (with an increasing number of others), "Mothers raise infants; fathers raise adults."
For over half a century, however, feminists have contradicted themselves by undermining not only motherhood (in the name of liberation for women to build "careers") but also fatherhood (in the name of "single mothers by choice"). As a result, fathers have become walking wallets at best and "deadbeat dads" or even potential molesters at worst. Restoring fathers to their central role in family life will require a major cultural effort.
This is a significant talent and strength you have, Tom, to take these generic theories and apply them to men and feminism in a systematic, detailed way. Well done.
Thank you David!
THIS is a great summary. While most of us can (and have repeatedly) regurgitated most of this list, it's great to have it in one place to help doubters with an overview. THANKS!
Brilliantly organized and presented!
Thanks for this, Tom. Been reading you for a long time.
I have a criticism though. What put feminist ideology on this horrific path? I say it's the Marxism and Postmodernism that did it.
Look at Judith Butler's Gender Trouble, the bible of radical gender ideology. It's driven by Critical Theory and Postmodern ideas about discourse. Earlier feminists were fans of the French revolution, socialism and then Marx, and the 'struggle' was seen as part of overthrowing oppression by aristocrats and evil capitalists.
But you don't mention any of this. To me it's the ultimate cause of how this became so radical and pernicious.
I agree with you. All you need to do is look at the money to see who was funding feminism from the beginning and you find it was not only the govt but orgs like Rockefeller or Ford. Not even close to being a grass roots movement though the mythology claims it is. People are slowly waking to the dark side of feminism. Eventually we will get to the puppet masters.
My biggest concern is the welfare of men and I try to keep that as my theme.
The Left wants women heavily involved in politics because women are natural communists.
It would be generous to say that these tactics against men are not intentional ("now being used — intentionally or not — against men"). They are, as DC notes below, systematic, not accidental. It is very useful to have these strategies listed and spelled out so that men, if they choose, can fight a system with a systematic tool. When I bring up some of these points, male friends often downplay them and even say that unfairness and outright discrimination are chances for us to man up. Too many men believe that it is their role to sacrifice, go the extra mile--put it however you like. These men believe that we have to be fair but don't need to be fairly treated, as if demanding fairness were somehow asking for a privilege. An excellent, informative, inspiring post. Thanks, Tom.
One way that men have to fight back is to resist the tendency to make sacrifices for women. Frankly, we need to treat them as toxic unless and until they show us proper dignity and respect. As with men who behave badly, we have no obligation to women whether to serve or sacrifice for them. If that leaves them in bad circumstances of their own making...too bad.
I think the tax system puts men on their knees, whether or not they get respect.
When's the last time welfare entitled ladies and lords expressed profound gratitude for tax payers donating to their needs before their own families'?
Fairness forgives patriarchy.
(satirical sloganeering)
That's pretty mind-blowing. Can you get Robert Jay Lifton onto your show?
I wish I could John. He's 99 years old and I am not sure he is interested in being interviewed but you never know. I will poke around a bit and see. He called all of this many years ago. It would be interesting to hear his take on our present mess.
Maybe you could create a GPT persona to interview
At 99 he might not want to bother with Zoom etc, and rightly so. Maybe there is someone else with similar expertise?
This article is a very accurate description of the situation Western society finds itself in. One question it doesn't answer is how it came to be that so many women seem to fall so easily into these nasty, seemingly unethical ways of manipulating others. The reality is that the coercive system of control in place is an extension of the manner in which women have always bullied others in society when men do not retain a firm hand and enforce social morays against bad behavior. If you doubt this, ask yourself where you see such bullying on a regular basis? Hint: Look at the behavior of teenage women against others. The problem is that women seem to be inherently prone to these types of social systems....validating societal systems to LIMIT the power and voices of women when they misbehave in this way.
Feminism is anti male hatred and bullying, what ever men do women always blame us, i would love women to have the privileges men have, such as the men being killed fighting in Ukraine, and men who suffer rejection from women so that we suffer depression and are added to a list of people at risk of suicide which is what' s happened to me, women insult lonely men by calling us incel's , yet women have the luxury of being approached by men , taken on a date , every thing paid for, women can get as much sex as they want and get paid for it. Governments only help women, its a matriarchy where the victims are the ones being demonised by privileged women who are so spoiled and blameless they actualy believe men have it better. what hypocrites women are.
Snow White will bring women to their senses.
Disney is spending big money on it.
It's all about the negative feminine and overcoming it in various ways.
Or was even snow white trammelled by the black boots of feminism?
I've been through it all.
It is Maoist struggle sessions.
Family is seen as black (not red) and Marx's call to 'aufheben die Familie' (abolish the family) is enacted.
Chinese boys of a certain age were taught 《爹亲娘亲不如毛主席亲》in school, meaning Dear Dad and Dear Mum aren't as good as Chairman Mao's dearness. Or Mao is better than Mum and Dad. Leading to cultural revolution killing tens of millions.
Struggle sessions are 批斗 or 'wholesale bullying' short for 批判斗争” or 'judgement beatings'. They were even held in stadiums. Dengxiao Ping was marched down the street in a dunce hat for his right roading a few years before he assumed control of the party.
Re-education is 洗脑 literally washing brains. It still goes on in the 劳改 network of reform through labour camps. And local black prisons where you're trapped in a steel seat and berated until you sign a confession etc. They even tie it in with a social credit score.
It's not too strong to say this is actual evil. The playbook of leftists has escaped all reasonable bounds. Repressive tolerance has stripped us of redress. But at some point their birth rate of minus 50% per generation will cause a policy response.
However, there is nuance. Feminism in China is under party control. It's actually extremely unfeminist. And recent family law reforms in China might appear reasonable, if revolutionary. And could solve our problems.
In China, the kidnapping parent, usually the mother. Is immediately stripped of custody. We'd call her the resident parent in England or the accuser in US. The judge who innovated this was killed extra judicially by her 'customers' but then it was picked up as new state law. They use the continental system relying on written law there, not English law where you make it up as you go along applying case law.
You can't anymore expropriate your spouses assets either. Nor your in-laws assets. And houses belong to who bought them irrespective of title. So it bans gold digging retrospectively.
Come to think of it. China doesn't have REMO reciprocity to auto enslave men through child support or spousal maintenance. But Hongkong does.
Is China becoming a human rights bright spot for family law?
"But at some point their birth rate of minus 50% per generation will cause a policy response."
It already has! It's called mass immigration. Mostly from Muslim countries who don't tolerate feminism. And since Muslim women greatly outbreed Western women, feminism will disappear in a few generations. Feminism is self-limiting, because it destroys the host population, by destroying reproduction. The future of the West is Muslim, it's a mathematical certainty.
I genuinely would like to know more about the "intersection" of feminism and Islam.
Can Islam stand against postmodernity?
I very much doubt it.
Although Pakistan is targeting a population greater than half a billion by the end of the century. Won't they start demanding welfare to feed single mothers? If not, why not. Or simply migrate else where and start becoming feminist. Or intensify abortion.
Who knows?
The feminists never figured that one. By discouraging women from reproducing our population will wither and vanish to be replaced by third world baby producers. Some utopia.
The Left, unfortunately, has no monopoly on brainwashing techniques. Another example would have been Nazi Germany, when children were trained in school and in compulsory youth organizations for both boys and girls to believe that no one superseded the Leader in wisdom or authority, not even their own parents--and, as religious parents soon found out, not even God. As a result, parents worried, with good reason, that their own children might betray them for disobedience to the Nazi party or disloyalty to the Aryan race (let alone for hiding Jews or helping dissidents). As a result, many parents ended up colluding in private with teachers and other authority figures (along with propaganda) in brainwashing the nation.
The Nazis did not use brainwashing techniques. Brainwashing was unknown during WWII. Brainwashing techniques were developed by communist regimes during the Cold War, and only came to Western attention through the work of Lifton and Biderman in the late 1950's. For example Biderman's Chart of Coercion published in 1957 identified eight specific methods employed by Chinese communist forces to brainwash captured US pilots during the Korean War: Isolation; Monopolization of perception; Induced debilitation and exhaustion; Threats; Occasional indulgences; Demonstrating "omnipotence" and "omniscience"; Degradation; Enforcing trivial demands. German schoolchildren and Hitler Youth were not subjected to these techniques. They were subjected to propaganda, not brainwashing. In the context of this article it's an important distinction.
Good point.
Although they were so extreme, it's like horse shoe theory.
The socialists and nationalists wrapped around and embraced.
"...the family courts don’t just separate fathers from their children — they separate men from their dignity and their purpose..."
Great phrasing and good to read an acknowledgement of that part of social engineering.
This is not only in the USA. By my experience, in the UK, too. By what I have heard running a forum where many expressed their angst and bewilderment (having assumed that justice would prevail) it happens across huge areas of the world, too.
Meanwhile, the statistical evidence continues to build of the problems caused in society by children not having dad at home.
This is a weak spot in the feminist Marxist edifice.
Most men don't believe it exists.
It's too evil to accept.
So spreading information would potentially enable it's down fall. It would only take restoration of principles of law such as fairness, considering everyone's interests, due process, natural rights, and constitutional law. It'll be just the stroke of a pen when it happens.
Right now we raise a brigade of new converts every day when USAs family courts hear 10,000 cases. At least 5,000 new men are inducted into the two tier injustice clown universe of "family law". They'll be mad, some won't make it, but many ultimately will accept reality.
I publicly argue that anyone that separates or actively supports such separation of fathers-children or parents-children should be publicly killed along with every one that hired or professionally supports them or connected to them along with all older adults in all their bloodlines.
It would require a bullet in my brain to change my mind, and frankly that would be somewhat better than this Hell with so many insane evil Feminized vile putrid demonic-possessed forms called from the pits of Hell and wrapped in human skin.
Of course, when I am Rightly and Justly Pope-King of the world, I (we) will serve and shape the world out of Hell and into God's Grace and Love as He walks or gardens or dances or .. with us all though our days of Meaning, as we serve and finely Enthrone Truth, Justice, Order, Charity, Love, .. in my place at our death.
--
One of the best solutions to this Synagogue of Satan Witch controlled hell would be to discover those 15 or so most powerful international interconnected families that rule with Satanic help all the world and us peoples, and order families by power, greatest on top, by using NSA and other 5-eyes.
Include not less than 3 levels down their webs of Witches' control network that serve them and at lowest level have minions in our families and workplaces and powerful institutions etc.
Make public the most powerful family's adult members, and command them to rule us all - in public to improve the least of us the most, and all of us more by growing and spreading truth, justice, order, Joy, Love, Meaning, .. and every 6 months everyone polled world-wide, and if 2 consecutive 6-months periods with poor betterment metrics then the entire family's blood-line adults will be publicly hanged, and the 2nd most powerful family taken over.
This is Just because they have been ruling for centuries, serving Satan in the Dark. They want power and to rule, okay, they get it and must do it well - or die in public hanging over the corpses of their entire bloodline adults.
Seem Just?
Do we hope for a future we can raise big loving families in? Well then, .. I offer my service to us all;
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2211:, 16th May 2025, Proposal and Apologetic; I should be Accepted as world Pope-King, How and Why..."
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2211
Good stuff. Bring on the artificial womb. We need to break the monopoly that women have on eugenics, which is IMO dysgenics.
This essay could well be your best ever, Tom, except that a few of your recent ones have met the same very high standard. You get an A+ for insight and clarity.
Of great importance is your willingness to add a specifically moral vocabulary to the usual psychological one. What we need so desperately is not so much group therapy, I think, but also moral reawakening. To regain moral stamina would mean recovering a specifically moral sensibility. No academic jargon can replace that.
Hatred is inherently evil, for instance, not merely ignorant or delusional or counterproductive (let alone something like "unnatural"). And unlike the ideologues, I suggest that its origin is not only "out there" with "them" but also "in here" within "us."
As it happens, we still have at our disposal (although we won't have it for long if we succumb to collective amnesia) is a moral vocabulary that has emerged over countless generations either through interpreting divine revelation (according to religious people) or through trial and error (according to secular people). No matter what its original context, the "golden rule" self-evidently makes moral sense as the bottom line for communal life at any time and in any place. No society can endure, in fact, unless everyone can agree on the need to "Do unto others ..." or "Do not do unto others ..." (or both). This is the sine qua non for any notion of fairness or justice and therefore our ultimate weapon in defense of our civilization (or any civilization) against any ideology--including feminism and its current allies.
Women were brainwashed first. Long before men. And even more deeply.
Imagine how stupid and brainwashed you have to be to turn on the male of your very own species and believe it is evil! Lol
And vote consistently for not only your personal destruction but those supposedly most dear to you.
There is no one more brainwashed and vacant eyed and gullible…
What you have written has been in the back of my mind for some time, but I have difficulty articulating my thoughts and making them sound rational.
The article articulates the process that the male gender has been subjected to very clearly.
It would cause severe cognitive dissonance in many people, and a flurry of papers would be written with the explicit purpose of dismissing it.
After my dream-job as a basic medical science researcher at a University and in a building, I was warned was packed with vicious man-hating psychotic back-stabbing lying Witch-Whisper-Web secrete coordinating unJust reputational destroying Love-Joy-Life-Hope soul-murdering demonic-forms wrapped in female skin .. well, I was warned that I would be targeted for being a white Christian-virtue value-raised intelligent open social able helpful hard-working critical employee surrounded by meritless-retarded Affirmative-Action productivity-destroying resent-filled women ..
.. I could not imagine anyone targeting me or having a problem I could not work-with others to fix.
Well, Dream-Job turned into a Toxic feminized insane baby-murdering psychotic Hell-hole.
Now each time I hear of a school, workplace, or public shooting I wonder it he killed the Witch and her coven and minions, and wonder why they aren't happening much more often.