There is a growing wave of attacks against what’s being called the “manosphere.” These attacks are coming primarily from feminist organizations and media allies who claim that the manosphere (the electronic patriarchy) is filled with misogynists who hate women and promote violence.
Now that I've been reading Men's Advocate Blogs for 5 years and learned a lot and also read many other things that I never thought would have an impact on my thinking (Ayn Rand for example) I can see that many Governments around the world are handing out money to NGO's of all sorts, which is in fact a 'kind of' wealth re-distribution!!
These NGO's were once known as 'charities' and I held the (somewhat naive) belief that these Charities are there to assist society in helping those that are 'disadvantaged'.. Yet, now the word is 'minority' perhaps and no-one is checking any of this and yet Trump decides to question USAID and where the money is going and so many are in uproar about certain Services being de-funded.
I often think now, 'how many citizens would pay for these so-called Services, NGO's if they were sent an Invoice each month rather than it all coming out of the mysterious taxation system that is not accountable to anyone?'
During the week I was speaking with a friend about many things and it strikes me that she was not thinking deeply enough or Enough about what her beliefs are. She thought it is alright to tax people as we needed roads etc., but she herself wants freedom. Yet when I try to bring up the fact that Governments Tax us (by force) without any direct say in where the money is going to, that she cannot think along these lines!!
I'm not saying I'm perfect but my friend has a lot of mixed and crossed over thoughts about things in her life. She attends the Feminist Demonstrations while loving her male partner because 'he is good to me'..... But doesn't want children nor to be married.
Please believe me that I can be as judgemental as hell but I'm not trying to be but point out that there is a lot of conflict in people and society and what Tom and Dr. Nuzzo point out is this conflict that is surrounding us and it is a nightmare to sort out and here is the example of UN Women but nothing for men??
I now think that the UN is just one big NGO that is trying to control the narrative (taken me a while to get to this point) and they exist from our money that is taken off us with out our directly determining where WE want that money to go to..
One of the words I see in a group I 'identify with' is the call for 'our rights' and I'm yet to see the list of Rights that 'we' are supposed to stand in Solidarity with/for.
I'm sorry I'm raving now.. but I had a week whereby many things exploded in my thinking and this chat was good for clarity..
As Tom has said often (my words), the feminists are throwing many things at everyone and that includes other females but there are no business plans as to what they want to achieve and what the required outcome is.. other than hate against those that disagree with them and I finish on that note.. many other things to say.. and my last thing is that I learned in Germany a couple of years ago what Fascism is and there are many groups on this planet that are either full on Fascists or borderline.. they think they are doing wonderful work but actually they are nothing better than the 1930's lead up to WWII... destroying those that disagree with them!!!
Your female friend does not appear to consider the impact of what the feminist protests are trying to achieve may have on her partner. Does not seem to think that far ahead.
I think the UN was and could still be a good institution. I believe it may still be in some areas, however I do believe it has been compromised.
I agree but I think a lot of us are waking up or need to wake up to 'the impact' of what we think and do.
I cannot agree with the UN sentence. It is just another way of an organisation trying to control but the whole world and not just one country. I'm sure there are many good people that think they are doing 'good'.
It was about 2011 or so, that a young woman I knew through a philosophy course scored an Internship at the UN in Geneva .. I do not remember all the details but after her year she went back to work in her mothers cafe in South Africa telling us that she found her time with the UN a waste of time!!! She was 19 at the time.....
"Your female friend .. Does not seem to think that far ahead."
Almost no women should have power over other adults, or over children without close Supervision by well (old standard Fatherhood) raised men. Fathers best. Universal Suffrage is National, State, Local, Institutional, family, personal suicide. Voters, Jurors, Gov employees, office-holders, managers, .. should demonstrate Service-Virtues by volunteering and performing regional, national, and perhaps international Service for 4 or more years with 1000+ hours/year, sex-segregated military style room-board training and team-work, to earn full citizenship and ability to have power over others.
Modern Western womanhood and generations of feminized fatherless raised adult children mind-raped from crib are functionally insane, accepting increasing insanities and evils; baby-murdering mothers, child sexual abusing mutilating mind-body-soul raping insanities supported by women, gov, corporations, institutions, .., VagFeelie-raised dog-males, 'Professionals', 'educated', delusional psychos that silently support years of open televised Gaza Ukraine-Russian Genocides and society destruction.
I remember 3 women in my entire (older boy - old man) life that seem to have the older standards of virtue and values that was standard to be raised with till womanhood Sickened and hyper-empowered, they married State, destroyed fatherhood and raised generations of fatherless Vag-feelie mind-raped insane-accepting children .. 3 women that Loved themselves and others like decent men Love, with truth, justice, right-Ordering, honor, courage, protect and prepare or correct female-evil future-destroying mind-raping beliefs like Feminism.
3 women that displayed male-virtue, 3! of many hundreds that lied in silence, that supported falseness and warped beliefs that were seeds of failure, suffering, confusion, .., death and hell.
Well, trust no woman's statements without independent (non-feminized Sick) alternate sources, no women 'professionals', no fatherless raised adult, no Witch-filled 'humanities' educated, no 'Science' or corporate media or services, no gov directions, court rulings, .., trust only those that have displayed virtue, merit, skill, wisdom, honor, truth, righteousness, good-order-seeking, competence, ...
Anyone that supports baby-murder, sexual-perversions and mutilations, genocide, family-fatherhood-manhood-truth-Justice-Order destruction in all the open clear ways can be assumed mind-raped (demonically controlled) and should no have power over others or trusted. Basically, Women and Fatherless raised males, and every institution with power over our lives.
--
After the Synagogue of Satan controlled SCOTUS ruled to legalize National Religion of torturing unborn babies to death silently screaming on mother's whim, when generations of fatherless children raised to accept insanities as normal or even praiseworthy the entire West became deranged and mind-raped .. what was a mostly sane West in early 1970s, became insane accepting once we accepted mothers may hire Witches or their minions to rip-apart our silently screaming unborn babies. Then dispose of fathers and men, destroy families, then accept open public perversions (we and our children forced to see near naked men acting-out sex-acts in 'Pride' calibrations), we accept child sexual mind-soul-body mutilations and mind-raping 'gender' untruthes, .. each generation of Sick motherhood fatherless raised children.
I have written a number of SubStack articles that outlines underlining Demonic forces and proposals for healing that I hope you and others will benefit from;
1. "Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2216:, 2nd June 2025, AI Dialog, Best argument against acceptance of Abortion or any evil insanity."
(This review is twisted and false in the beginning 'Motivation' aspects were some personal experiences are misrepresented and dog-whistling reputational undermining, rest is okay.)
If men have one flaw, it's that they love their peace. They are slow to anger, slow to react, and often very much unprepared - Pearl Harbor, of course, the archetype of where that gets you.
However, all is not lost - or even in question. Men also have an unmatched strength - the ability to organize for a common goal. Rather than playing defense, now is THE time to put together - or revive - an organization to represent, defend, and promote men, an organization that puts forth calm, reasonable arguments voiced by calm, reasonable men. Most importantly, it needs to play OFFENSE - pointing out the misandry and chaos (but I repeat myself) of feminism and counter it aggressively.
Now is the time to move - not after the communists, feminists, and globalists castrate us in the way Canada and most of Europe are being castrated before our very eyes. We don't have to reinvent the wheel; before it went Woke, the ADL was a great example of an effective counter to a nasty, vicious ideology. I'm in; let's go!
Excellent interview. The UN has been involved in chicanery over sexual matters for decades. It is no exaggeration to say that pushing feminism is the main activity of the UN bureaucracy, and it forms a part of everything they do. If you want the larger context for what this gentleman says about the UN, you can find it in Part Four of my book, The New Politics of Sex: https://www.stephenbaskerville.com/new-politics-of-sex.
Here is the ToC and first pararaph of that section:
IV. Globalizing Sex—and Sexual Power 276
14. Sex and the International Regime 281
United States Foreign Policy
The European Union
The United Nations
15. Human Rights: Still More Gender Crimes 307
CEDAW
Convention on the Rights of the Child
Yogyakarta Principles
Domestic Violence (again)
Sex Education
16. Politicizing AIDS 358
17. Poverty and Development (and Sex) 363
18. Yet More Gender Crimes 376
Child Soldiers
Sex Trafficking
19. Islamism as a Sexual Ideology 409
20. Sexualizing War 419
The United Nations
Critics of the UN often dismiss it as an ineffectual, and therefore innocuous, international debating forum with little tangible impact on international affairs. Yet beneath the media radar screen, UN operatives are active in ways most people are completely unaware. Feminists in particular, write Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young, “have turned the United Nations, which began with the limited goal of preventing wars, into the global headquarters of feminist missionaries.” In UN documents, “‘peace’, ‘justice,’ and ‘development’ are linked over and over again with women,” they point out. “The unavoidable implication is that only women want these good things or that only women have the innate skills to produce and sustain them.”
Some 1,300 “gender focal points” exist to address “women” or “gender” in the UN system, according to feminists who insist it is not enough. Whereas governments of free societies do not adopt official ideologies for officials to impose on citizens, feminism (“gender perspective”) is unquestionably the official political doctrine of the UN, whose agencies are required to incorporate it “in all policies and programs.” One UN administrative office—the equivalent of a civil service agency that is normally required to be a politically neutral implementer of policy and refrain from political advocacy—promises that it “will advocate for legal reforms and adoption of policies and programmes that will raise the status of girls and women both in the family and in society.” Hundreds of offices and officials, “including the United Nations Secretariat, regional commissions, funds, programmes, specialized agencies, and academic and research institutions” are all devoted to (in the ubiquitous if oxymoronic phrase) the “promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women,” according to Womenwatch, which describes itself as “the central gateway to information and resources on the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women throughout the United Nations system.” This agency is itself the creation of an “interagency network” of agencies devoted to gender and women. “It was founded by the Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW), United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), and United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (INSTRAW).” It is administered “by a taskforce of the Inter-Agency Network, led by the Division for the Advancement of Women. A Policy Advisory Group (currently comprised of the Gender Focal Points in DPI, FAO, ILO, INSTRAW, ITU, Regional Commissions (ECA, ECE, ECLAC, ESCAP, ESCWA, and Regional Commissions New York Office), UNDP, UNESCO, UNFPA, UN-HABITAT, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO, and DAW)… [sic].” ...
Let's not forget about the circumcision violent male genital mutilation child sexual abuse solely perpetrated upon boys for a hundred years in the so called land of "freedom and liberty" USA, so much freedom yet men don't own their own cocks.
Not to mention all of the disgusting and debased cruel jokes about circumcision and the shaming of foreskin in crappy Hollywood garbage films and banal sitcoms.
Men don't have basic genital integrity and body autonomy for a century in a land where people see themselves as world leaders and the most moral and ethical! Such evil misandrist hypocrisy.
Women talk about my body my choice, and society is blind to the routine sexual mutilation and fight flight freeze trauma that is perpetrated upon baby boys.
Also, women have optional motherhood, but fatherhood is forced and at the mercy of the woman and the state. Men don't have reproductive rights either.
Then there's the male only draft, but I digress.
Circumcision is violent blade rape.
Europe, Japan, the majority of the world - knows better.
That's actual rape culture.
Foregen is a biotech company raising money for the final phase 3 of 3 human trials on GoFundMe.
They are regenerating foreskins through regenerative medicine to reverse circumcision mutilation.
They've already had successful phase 2 animal trials and have received millions on donations.
They're almost ready to be public.
Over 6500+ species of mammals have foreskins, it is not a mistake.
It has the majority of nerve endings and sensitivity of the penis. More pleasure, lubrication, less excessive friction WHICH ACTUALLY REDUCES DISEASE TRANSMISSION! YES, YOU HEARD THAT RIGHT. CIRCUMCISION=MORE FRICTION=MORE MICRO CUTS AND ABRASIONS=MORE HIV TRANSMISSION AND STDs - look it up.
European medical associations know how disgusting and crippling circumcision is.
Iceland almost banned circumcision but the selfish ADL and the USA pressured them not to. They will vote in a few years again to try to ban it again.
I hope they do.
Any culture that circumcises is not ethical or modern, but they are child sexual abusers and traumatizers.
No argument about it.
Also, they sell baby boy foreskin cells online as HFF, neonatal human foreskin fibroblasts, for $500 a vial in Sigma Aldrich and other biotech firms.
Circumcision and foreskin is a billion dollar industry.
Cosmetic companies can test their product on foreskin fibroblasts and then say they are CRUELTY FREE on their packaging! Why! Because they didn't test on the precious animals! Animals that are cared for more than human baby boys.
Feminism is a hate movement, its got nothing at all to do with equality, they have a matriarchy where women can say what they like and have government departments helping them. but they don't want men to have a voice, feminists set out to deliberately damage boys education which they have, they want equality in pay but leave men to do all the dirty, dangerous work , equal rights but only men have to sign for the draft, . i wish men would stand up to them because they are becoming spoiled blameless, demanding brats who want everything their own way. They dont want men to have any kind of equality.
A question: the journals/publication's where people have complained about the 'references' etc., being incorrect, do these publications issue a reprint/an apology/ ban the person from printing again because they have mislead the public?
If we were still living in caves and such information was wrong it could mean the difference between continuing to live and feeling safe in a harsh environment, or perishing due to the dinosaur attack that was imminent not being announced to the community correctly!!!!
That's a good question. No, the paper that contains the inaccurate reference typically remains as it is. Sometimes, if a researcher sees that their work has been reference, they will publish a letter to the editor in that journal, pointing out that their work has been misreferenced. Then, the author who misreferenced will have a chance to write a letter reply. The author may even apologise for the misreference (or perhaps defend it). Either way, I am unaware of instances where the actual paper has been modified by the author or the journal to address the misreference.
Note that this isn't the same as falsifying the data in the paper. If that happens, and is found out, the paper is typically retracted from the journal. Misreferencing, on the other hand, typically isn't viewed by editors and publishers as a big enough ethical or scientific violation to warrant retraction of the published paper.
Ok. it's complicated .. it sounds.. but at least something happens and it is not just 100% ignored by all...
I typed that, then read your last sentence.. and that is what I mean.. the publishers just carry on. Hence my dinosaur comment.. kind of makes science less believable then!!!
Most of the time misreferencing is either not identified or it is ignored if identified by the researcher whose work is being misreferenced. Often, the researcher whose work has been misreference will feel that they don't have the time to write a letter pointing out the issue.
Nevertheless, pointing out misreferencing is one function of letters to the editor in academic publishing. In my analysis of over 2,000 letters, I found that 12% of letters were written to highlight some issue with misreferencing. Here is the link to that analysis: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-021-04068-w
48:06 the Swedish feminist government is a significant contributor to UNWomen. According to "Mål, makt och myndighet - feministisk politik för en jämställd framtid" (this publication is only in Swedish), page 58, Sweden has been the biggest contributor to UNWomen several years.
I've had thoughts, since reading this article and the comments, that the Feminist push or many other pushes from other organisations is/has slowly turned us into Victims!!
In one way it is easier to become a victim and not say anything or join a group... but if one really pays attention there are conflicts within every group!!
I've also started thinking that many of the cultural events that I can attend are actually arranged by some government department or at least supported financially by tax payers money (who may never have directly voted for this event).
A point for me is a friend, here in Switzerland, was telling me how one of the religious holidays is still celebrated but in the old fashioned way but with some restrictions like 'not using actual weapons anymore'.. it strikes me how all this has changed from ?? some pagan/relgiious/spiritual celebration to a money making exercise for the government now to keep people busy or redistribute money or create 'solidarity'.. This ritual is, maybe, more than two hundred years old and still being enacted when most people just want a day off work and/or to get drunk or go out for a picnic..
I'm sorry if this sounds negative but I'm interested if what I'm saying makes sense or someone has a similar situation !!! I'm far away from the manosphere but I see some of this as an attack of humans or a way of controlling humans.. I don't want to sound all Marxist but... I wonder sometimes...
some of these 'cultural' events either here or back in my home land mean absolutely nothing to me...
The actions of UN Women are like many globalist attempts to impose a particular political agenda on all of humanity. Fortunately for us, the UN has many, many Islamic states who have no use for feminist values or women in general. One way men can fight back against this (besides defunding organizations like the UN) but to stop defending feminists when Muslims object to their behavior. It's time to let feminists face the consequences of their actions...and...unlike the Manosphere...Muslims are more than willing to use violence to "correct" MissConduct!
Now that I've been reading Men's Advocate Blogs for 5 years and learned a lot and also read many other things that I never thought would have an impact on my thinking (Ayn Rand for example) I can see that many Governments around the world are handing out money to NGO's of all sorts, which is in fact a 'kind of' wealth re-distribution!!
These NGO's were once known as 'charities' and I held the (somewhat naive) belief that these Charities are there to assist society in helping those that are 'disadvantaged'.. Yet, now the word is 'minority' perhaps and no-one is checking any of this and yet Trump decides to question USAID and where the money is going and so many are in uproar about certain Services being de-funded.
I often think now, 'how many citizens would pay for these so-called Services, NGO's if they were sent an Invoice each month rather than it all coming out of the mysterious taxation system that is not accountable to anyone?'
During the week I was speaking with a friend about many things and it strikes me that she was not thinking deeply enough or Enough about what her beliefs are. She thought it is alright to tax people as we needed roads etc., but she herself wants freedom. Yet when I try to bring up the fact that Governments Tax us (by force) without any direct say in where the money is going to, that she cannot think along these lines!!
I'm not saying I'm perfect but my friend has a lot of mixed and crossed over thoughts about things in her life. She attends the Feminist Demonstrations while loving her male partner because 'he is good to me'..... But doesn't want children nor to be married.
Please believe me that I can be as judgemental as hell but I'm not trying to be but point out that there is a lot of conflict in people and society and what Tom and Dr. Nuzzo point out is this conflict that is surrounding us and it is a nightmare to sort out and here is the example of UN Women but nothing for men??
I now think that the UN is just one big NGO that is trying to control the narrative (taken me a while to get to this point) and they exist from our money that is taken off us with out our directly determining where WE want that money to go to..
One of the words I see in a group I 'identify with' is the call for 'our rights' and I'm yet to see the list of Rights that 'we' are supposed to stand in Solidarity with/for.
I'm sorry I'm raving now.. but I had a week whereby many things exploded in my thinking and this chat was good for clarity..
As Tom has said often (my words), the feminists are throwing many things at everyone and that includes other females but there are no business plans as to what they want to achieve and what the required outcome is.. other than hate against those that disagree with them and I finish on that note.. many other things to say.. and my last thing is that I learned in Germany a couple of years ago what Fascism is and there are many groups on this planet that are either full on Fascists or borderline.. they think they are doing wonderful work but actually they are nothing better than the 1930's lead up to WWII... destroying those that disagree with them!!!
Great talk Tom and Jim..
Your female friend does not appear to consider the impact of what the feminist protests are trying to achieve may have on her partner. Does not seem to think that far ahead.
I think the UN was and could still be a good institution. I believe it may still be in some areas, however I do believe it has been compromised.
I agree but I think a lot of us are waking up or need to wake up to 'the impact' of what we think and do.
I cannot agree with the UN sentence. It is just another way of an organisation trying to control but the whole world and not just one country. I'm sure there are many good people that think they are doing 'good'.
It was about 2011 or so, that a young woman I knew through a philosophy course scored an Internship at the UN in Geneva .. I do not remember all the details but after her year she went back to work in her mothers cafe in South Africa telling us that she found her time with the UN a waste of time!!! She was 19 at the time.....
"Your female friend .. Does not seem to think that far ahead."
Almost no women should have power over other adults, or over children without close Supervision by well (old standard Fatherhood) raised men. Fathers best. Universal Suffrage is National, State, Local, Institutional, family, personal suicide. Voters, Jurors, Gov employees, office-holders, managers, .. should demonstrate Service-Virtues by volunteering and performing regional, national, and perhaps international Service for 4 or more years with 1000+ hours/year, sex-segregated military style room-board training and team-work, to earn full citizenship and ability to have power over others.
Modern Western womanhood and generations of feminized fatherless raised adult children mind-raped from crib are functionally insane, accepting increasing insanities and evils; baby-murdering mothers, child sexual abusing mutilating mind-body-soul raping insanities supported by women, gov, corporations, institutions, .., VagFeelie-raised dog-males, 'Professionals', 'educated', delusional psychos that silently support years of open televised Gaza Ukraine-Russian Genocides and society destruction.
I remember 3 women in my entire (older boy - old man) life that seem to have the older standards of virtue and values that was standard to be raised with till womanhood Sickened and hyper-empowered, they married State, destroyed fatherhood and raised generations of fatherless Vag-feelie mind-raped insane-accepting children .. 3 women that Loved themselves and others like decent men Love, with truth, justice, right-Ordering, honor, courage, protect and prepare or correct female-evil future-destroying mind-raping beliefs like Feminism.
3 women that displayed male-virtue, 3! of many hundreds that lied in silence, that supported falseness and warped beliefs that were seeds of failure, suffering, confusion, .., death and hell.
Well, trust no woman's statements without independent (non-feminized Sick) alternate sources, no women 'professionals', no fatherless raised adult, no Witch-filled 'humanities' educated, no 'Science' or corporate media or services, no gov directions, court rulings, .., trust only those that have displayed virtue, merit, skill, wisdom, honor, truth, righteousness, good-order-seeking, competence, ...
Anyone that supports baby-murder, sexual-perversions and mutilations, genocide, family-fatherhood-manhood-truth-Justice-Order destruction in all the open clear ways can be assumed mind-raped (demonically controlled) and should no have power over others or trusted. Basically, Women and Fatherless raised males, and every institution with power over our lives.
--
After the Synagogue of Satan controlled SCOTUS ruled to legalize National Religion of torturing unborn babies to death silently screaming on mother's whim, when generations of fatherless children raised to accept insanities as normal or even praiseworthy the entire West became deranged and mind-raped .. what was a mostly sane West in early 1970s, became insane accepting once we accepted mothers may hire Witches or their minions to rip-apart our silently screaming unborn babies. Then dispose of fathers and men, destroy families, then accept open public perversions (we and our children forced to see near naked men acting-out sex-acts in 'Pride' calibrations), we accept child sexual mind-soul-body mutilations and mind-raping 'gender' untruthes, .. each generation of Sick motherhood fatherless raised children.
I have written a number of SubStack articles that outlines underlining Demonic forces and proposals for healing that I hope you and others will benefit from;
1. "Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2216:, 2nd June 2025, AI Dialog, Best argument against acceptance of Abortion or any evil insanity."
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2216
AI generated audio overview:
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/b1015d63-8c29-44b1-8080-8a6a5efce59f/audio
2. "Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2212:, 18th May 2025, .. Proposals to Heal the Nation .."
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2212
AI generated audio overview, last two proposals:
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/c3f4711e-fcef-414d-9e93-bc301155745e/audio
3. "Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2211:, 16th May 2025, Proposal and Apologetic; I should be Accepted as world Pope-King, How and Why..."
AI generated audio overview;
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/75ae90ed-fa65-453f-a111-c4a5f2f21ea5/audio
(This review is twisted and false in the beginning 'Motivation' aspects were some personal experiences are misrepresented and dog-whistling reputational undermining, rest is okay.)
If men have one flaw, it's that they love their peace. They are slow to anger, slow to react, and often very much unprepared - Pearl Harbor, of course, the archetype of where that gets you.
However, all is not lost - or even in question. Men also have an unmatched strength - the ability to organize for a common goal. Rather than playing defense, now is THE time to put together - or revive - an organization to represent, defend, and promote men, an organization that puts forth calm, reasonable arguments voiced by calm, reasonable men. Most importantly, it needs to play OFFENSE - pointing out the misandry and chaos (but I repeat myself) of feminism and counter it aggressively.
Now is the time to move - not after the communists, feminists, and globalists castrate us in the way Canada and most of Europe are being castrated before our very eyes. We don't have to reinvent the wheel; before it went Woke, the ADL was a great example of an effective counter to a nasty, vicious ideology. I'm in; let's go!
Excellent interview. The UN has been involved in chicanery over sexual matters for decades. It is no exaggeration to say that pushing feminism is the main activity of the UN bureaucracy, and it forms a part of everything they do. If you want the larger context for what this gentleman says about the UN, you can find it in Part Four of my book, The New Politics of Sex: https://www.stephenbaskerville.com/new-politics-of-sex.
Here is the ToC and first pararaph of that section:
IV. Globalizing Sex—and Sexual Power 276
14. Sex and the International Regime 281
United States Foreign Policy
The European Union
The United Nations
15. Human Rights: Still More Gender Crimes 307
CEDAW
Convention on the Rights of the Child
Yogyakarta Principles
Domestic Violence (again)
Sex Education
16. Politicizing AIDS 358
17. Poverty and Development (and Sex) 363
18. Yet More Gender Crimes 376
Child Soldiers
Sex Trafficking
19. Islamism as a Sexual Ideology 409
20. Sexualizing War 419
The United Nations
Critics of the UN often dismiss it as an ineffectual, and therefore innocuous, international debating forum with little tangible impact on international affairs. Yet beneath the media radar screen, UN operatives are active in ways most people are completely unaware. Feminists in particular, write Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young, “have turned the United Nations, which began with the limited goal of preventing wars, into the global headquarters of feminist missionaries.” In UN documents, “‘peace’, ‘justice,’ and ‘development’ are linked over and over again with women,” they point out. “The unavoidable implication is that only women want these good things or that only women have the innate skills to produce and sustain them.”
Some 1,300 “gender focal points” exist to address “women” or “gender” in the UN system, according to feminists who insist it is not enough. Whereas governments of free societies do not adopt official ideologies for officials to impose on citizens, feminism (“gender perspective”) is unquestionably the official political doctrine of the UN, whose agencies are required to incorporate it “in all policies and programs.” One UN administrative office—the equivalent of a civil service agency that is normally required to be a politically neutral implementer of policy and refrain from political advocacy—promises that it “will advocate for legal reforms and adoption of policies and programmes that will raise the status of girls and women both in the family and in society.” Hundreds of offices and officials, “including the United Nations Secretariat, regional commissions, funds, programmes, specialized agencies, and academic and research institutions” are all devoted to (in the ubiquitous if oxymoronic phrase) the “promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women,” according to Womenwatch, which describes itself as “the central gateway to information and resources on the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women throughout the United Nations system.” This agency is itself the creation of an “interagency network” of agencies devoted to gender and women. “It was founded by the Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW), United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), and United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (INSTRAW).” It is administered “by a taskforce of the Inter-Agency Network, led by the Division for the Advancement of Women. A Policy Advisory Group (currently comprised of the Gender Focal Points in DPI, FAO, ILO, INSTRAW, ITU, Regional Commissions (ECA, ECE, ECLAC, ESCAP, ESCWA, and Regional Commissions New York Office), UNDP, UNESCO, UNFPA, UN-HABITAT, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO, and DAW)… [sic].” ...
for anyone interested here's a link to the book https://amzn.to/3DIYjif
Let's not forget about the circumcision violent male genital mutilation child sexual abuse solely perpetrated upon boys for a hundred years in the so called land of "freedom and liberty" USA, so much freedom yet men don't own their own cocks.
Not to mention all of the disgusting and debased cruel jokes about circumcision and the shaming of foreskin in crappy Hollywood garbage films and banal sitcoms.
Men don't have basic genital integrity and body autonomy for a century in a land where people see themselves as world leaders and the most moral and ethical! Such evil misandrist hypocrisy.
Women talk about my body my choice, and society is blind to the routine sexual mutilation and fight flight freeze trauma that is perpetrated upon baby boys.
Also, women have optional motherhood, but fatherhood is forced and at the mercy of the woman and the state. Men don't have reproductive rights either.
Then there's the male only draft, but I digress.
Circumcision is violent blade rape.
Europe, Japan, the majority of the world - knows better.
That's actual rape culture.
Foregen is a biotech company raising money for the final phase 3 of 3 human trials on GoFundMe.
They are regenerating foreskins through regenerative medicine to reverse circumcision mutilation.
They've already had successful phase 2 animal trials and have received millions on donations.
They're almost ready to be public.
Over 6500+ species of mammals have foreskins, it is not a mistake.
It has the majority of nerve endings and sensitivity of the penis. More pleasure, lubrication, less excessive friction WHICH ACTUALLY REDUCES DISEASE TRANSMISSION! YES, YOU HEARD THAT RIGHT. CIRCUMCISION=MORE FRICTION=MORE MICRO CUTS AND ABRASIONS=MORE HIV TRANSMISSION AND STDs - look it up.
European medical associations know how disgusting and crippling circumcision is.
Iceland almost banned circumcision but the selfish ADL and the USA pressured them not to. They will vote in a few years again to try to ban it again.
I hope they do.
Any culture that circumcises is not ethical or modern, but they are child sexual abusers and traumatizers.
No argument about it.
Also, they sell baby boy foreskin cells online as HFF, neonatal human foreskin fibroblasts, for $500 a vial in Sigma Aldrich and other biotech firms.
Circumcision and foreskin is a billion dollar industry.
Cosmetic companies can test their product on foreskin fibroblasts and then say they are CRUELTY FREE on their packaging! Why! Because they didn't test on the precious animals! Animals that are cared for more than human baby boys.
If you care about boys, say something.
"Circumcision is violent blade rape." Totally agree. And no one even pauses. And the bil gates travesty of circumcising so many innocent boys in Africa. My guess is he made a bundle. https://menaregood.substack.com/p/circumcision-follow-the-money
Feminism is a hate movement, its got nothing at all to do with equality, they have a matriarchy where women can say what they like and have government departments helping them. but they don't want men to have a voice, feminists set out to deliberately damage boys education which they have, they want equality in pay but leave men to do all the dirty, dangerous work , equal rights but only men have to sign for the draft, . i wish men would stand up to them because they are becoming spoiled blameless, demanding brats who want everything their own way. They dont want men to have any kind of equality.
A question: the journals/publication's where people have complained about the 'references' etc., being incorrect, do these publications issue a reprint/an apology/ ban the person from printing again because they have mislead the public?
If we were still living in caves and such information was wrong it could mean the difference between continuing to live and feeling safe in a harsh environment, or perishing due to the dinosaur attack that was imminent not being announced to the community correctly!!!!
That's a good question. No, the paper that contains the inaccurate reference typically remains as it is. Sometimes, if a researcher sees that their work has been reference, they will publish a letter to the editor in that journal, pointing out that their work has been misreferenced. Then, the author who misreferenced will have a chance to write a letter reply. The author may even apologise for the misreference (or perhaps defend it). Either way, I am unaware of instances where the actual paper has been modified by the author or the journal to address the misreference.
Note that this isn't the same as falsifying the data in the paper. If that happens, and is found out, the paper is typically retracted from the journal. Misreferencing, on the other hand, typically isn't viewed by editors and publishers as a big enough ethical or scientific violation to warrant retraction of the published paper.
Ok. it's complicated .. it sounds.. but at least something happens and it is not just 100% ignored by all...
I typed that, then read your last sentence.. and that is what I mean.. the publishers just carry on. Hence my dinosaur comment.. kind of makes science less believable then!!!
Thanks for the reply...
Most of the time misreferencing is either not identified or it is ignored if identified by the researcher whose work is being misreferenced. Often, the researcher whose work has been misreference will feel that they don't have the time to write a letter pointing out the issue.
Nevertheless, pointing out misreferencing is one function of letters to the editor in academic publishing. In my analysis of over 2,000 letters, I found that 12% of letters were written to highlight some issue with misreferencing. Here is the link to that analysis: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-021-04068-w
I had wondered about the 'not enough time to write to the publisher'...
Thanks for the link.
Interesting terminology: authorship inflation
Thanks Tom.
A good way to describe how your dems are puzzled to the increasing push back of men is illustrated by freedomtoons:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KsMlpqhLdg
The reality is that the "manosphere" is the only area that is not controlled by globalist pushing Agenda 2030.
They want to control the narrative, so they will continue pushing a narrative against that. We need to save this from thier action. Go ahead!!
48:06 the Swedish feminist government is a significant contributor to UNWomen. According to "Mål, makt och myndighet - feministisk politik för en jämställd framtid" (this publication is only in Swedish), page 58, Sweden has been the biggest contributor to UNWomen several years.
Men have to write to organisations that promote anything 'anti male' or don't include men and accuse them of exclusion.
Maybe write to Movember and tell them that because of their anti male rhetoric you no longer financially support them or will not promote them.
I'm just trying to brainstorm something different.
Maybe when men start ignoring women they might listen!!!!!
I've had thoughts, since reading this article and the comments, that the Feminist push or many other pushes from other organisations is/has slowly turned us into Victims!!
In one way it is easier to become a victim and not say anything or join a group... but if one really pays attention there are conflicts within every group!!
I've also started thinking that many of the cultural events that I can attend are actually arranged by some government department or at least supported financially by tax payers money (who may never have directly voted for this event).
A point for me is a friend, here in Switzerland, was telling me how one of the religious holidays is still celebrated but in the old fashioned way but with some restrictions like 'not using actual weapons anymore'.. it strikes me how all this has changed from ?? some pagan/relgiious/spiritual celebration to a money making exercise for the government now to keep people busy or redistribute money or create 'solidarity'.. This ritual is, maybe, more than two hundred years old and still being enacted when most people just want a day off work and/or to get drunk or go out for a picnic..
I'm sorry if this sounds negative but I'm interested if what I'm saying makes sense or someone has a similar situation !!! I'm far away from the manosphere but I see some of this as an attack of humans or a way of controlling humans.. I don't want to sound all Marxist but... I wonder sometimes...
some of these 'cultural' events either here or back in my home land mean absolutely nothing to me...
I keep anashamedly announcing Rainer Schnurre's words: The “United Nations” are not at all United!
This German man critiqued the UN's Human Rights Declaration of 1948.
The actions of UN Women are like many globalist attempts to impose a particular political agenda on all of humanity. Fortunately for us, the UN has many, many Islamic states who have no use for feminist values or women in general. One way men can fight back against this (besides defunding organizations like the UN) but to stop defending feminists when Muslims object to their behavior. It's time to let feminists face the consequences of their actions...and...unlike the Manosphere...Muslims are more than willing to use violence to "correct" MissConduct!