As a grandparent of both boys and girls, I want to see us teaching our youth a thing called “personal responsibility and accountability.” In other words, this excellent discussion points to generations of parents and grandparents neglecting our duties of teaching our kids the basics about men, about women, and about healthy relationships with one another. Good job, trio!
Another excellent presentation. First...let us remember that the #MeToo Movement is really just another name for MeanGirlsR'Us. The reality is that women engage in emotional manipulation all the time...but resent when a man is effective at returning the favor to them. Feminists argue that a woman can be as fickle as she wants...even to withdrawing consent for a sex act in progress without any impacts or expectation on the part of the man of a future relationship...yet now are aghast when men like Mr. Landis engage in the same sort of activity with them.
Indeed, a significant number of complaints of sexual harassment/rape etc. arise as false accusations because the man decides the next day that he doesn't want to be your prince charming and continue what was a clearly consensual relationship. The women are angry and bitter about this...will claim to feel "used" ... and then morph that into their mind that they have been raped. This is the actual strategy used by the Sexual Harassment and Rape Prevention Program at the University of New Hampshire has been using for 30+ years and is often cited as a model by feminists for how universities should address the "rape" culture.
This idea of emotional abuse being "criminalized" however is a dangerous next step that could well backfire on women who are far, far, far, far more likely to be guilty of such conduct than men. Perhaps its time we start calling this out naming the women publicly by laying out in great detail every action they took. Remember...feminists always seek to "shield" the woman from any examination of her conduct and actions when a case of rape or harassment is being adjudicated. The reason is not that the woman doesn't want to have to 'relive' the event. It's because her own conduct demonstrates that she is not a victim and is, in fact, often the perpetrator of misconduct.
The return to Victorian mores caused by too many women's inability to handle the responsibility that came with the freedom to make their own choices could very well lead to society concluding that women aren't ready to have such rights and that society should return to practices of Victorian England...or 7th Century Arabia...or the Boston of A Handmaid's Tale. Feminism has put women on far thinner ice than they realize...and the world is warming rapidly!
Professor Daphne Patai wrote about this situation happening.
How a man's sexual history could be used against him.
I agree with Janice that unless there are charges or a conviction the man's name should not be publicly available, as allegations are being weaponised.
As always, most enlightening. Thank you for the stories and personal honesty.
I hope the following is understandable.
Feminism walks two paths at once whilst showing one face:
1. You must behave so that we are proven right and if you don’t then we will punish you.;
2. You must behave so that our ideology is always proven right and if you don’t then we will punish you.
Recently I found myself watching a movie about the ballet dancer Rudolf Nureyev https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAqmm9rAPXk and the scene where Nureyev is at a French airport and is told he will fly back to Moscow instead of going to London, then he decides to ‘defect’ (so it seems) but keep in mind that the KGB have been watching him closely -please watch it to fully understand..
But for me.. I thought these bastards - if he didn’t do as they wanted, not only from the KGB, he was punished and that meant they controlled his life in ‘their way’ and when he did do as they wanted then they still controlled his life ‘their way’.. always with the overhang of a threat.
What I realised was that the Bottom Line was always about maintaining the image of the Soviet Union (feminism), of communism (feminism) and that it must be shown as being ‘successful’ - and it didn’t matter what they (KGB, leaders, etc,.) had to do to maintain that image - BUT, millions died in the Soviet Union under Communism and people still want to support Marxism (feminism) …
As a grandparent of both boys and girls, I want to see us teaching our youth a thing called “personal responsibility and accountability.” In other words, this excellent discussion points to generations of parents and grandparents neglecting our duties of teaching our kids the basics about men, about women, and about healthy relationships with one another. Good job, trio!
Amen Kathy. Always good to see you!
Another excellent presentation. First...let us remember that the #MeToo Movement is really just another name for MeanGirlsR'Us. The reality is that women engage in emotional manipulation all the time...but resent when a man is effective at returning the favor to them. Feminists argue that a woman can be as fickle as she wants...even to withdrawing consent for a sex act in progress without any impacts or expectation on the part of the man of a future relationship...yet now are aghast when men like Mr. Landis engage in the same sort of activity with them.
Indeed, a significant number of complaints of sexual harassment/rape etc. arise as false accusations because the man decides the next day that he doesn't want to be your prince charming and continue what was a clearly consensual relationship. The women are angry and bitter about this...will claim to feel "used" ... and then morph that into their mind that they have been raped. This is the actual strategy used by the Sexual Harassment and Rape Prevention Program at the University of New Hampshire has been using for 30+ years and is often cited as a model by feminists for how universities should address the "rape" culture.
This idea of emotional abuse being "criminalized" however is a dangerous next step that could well backfire on women who are far, far, far, far more likely to be guilty of such conduct than men. Perhaps its time we start calling this out naming the women publicly by laying out in great detail every action they took. Remember...feminists always seek to "shield" the woman from any examination of her conduct and actions when a case of rape or harassment is being adjudicated. The reason is not that the woman doesn't want to have to 'relive' the event. It's because her own conduct demonstrates that she is not a victim and is, in fact, often the perpetrator of misconduct.
The return to Victorian mores caused by too many women's inability to handle the responsibility that came with the freedom to make their own choices could very well lead to society concluding that women aren't ready to have such rights and that society should return to practices of Victorian England...or 7th Century Arabia...or the Boston of A Handmaid's Tale. Feminism has put women on far thinner ice than they realize...and the world is warming rapidly!
Feminism is a big word for rage.
Professor Daphne Patai wrote about this situation happening.
How a man's sexual history could be used against him.
I agree with Janice that unless there are charges or a conviction the man's name should not be publicly available, as allegations are being weaponised.
As always, most enlightening. Thank you for the stories and personal honesty.
I hope the following is understandable.
Feminism walks two paths at once whilst showing one face:
1. You must behave so that we are proven right and if you don’t then we will punish you.;
2. You must behave so that our ideology is always proven right and if you don’t then we will punish you.
Recently I found myself watching a movie about the ballet dancer Rudolf Nureyev https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAqmm9rAPXk and the scene where Nureyev is at a French airport and is told he will fly back to Moscow instead of going to London, then he decides to ‘defect’ (so it seems) but keep in mind that the KGB have been watching him closely -please watch it to fully understand..
But for me.. I thought these bastards - if he didn’t do as they wanted, not only from the KGB, he was punished and that meant they controlled his life in ‘their way’ and when he did do as they wanted then they still controlled his life ‘their way’.. always with the overhang of a threat.
What I realised was that the Bottom Line was always about maintaining the image of the Soviet Union (feminism), of communism (feminism) and that it must be shown as being ‘successful’ - and it didn’t matter what they (KGB, leaders, etc,.) had to do to maintain that image - BUT, millions died in the Soviet Union under Communism and people still want to support Marxism (feminism) …
Feminists and the Spin Sisters in the media are the Stasi.
The aim is to destroy using Stasi tactics anyone they deem to be the enemy.
He "made them fall in love with him"?
Don Juan and Svengali in one single package.
Unrequited love does not a crime make.
It’s really primal stuff you all are addressing. I mean, can we PLEASE get back to basics?? Sheesh.