If single motherhood is so good for children why is it that the dead beat parent rate for fathers is only 50% while that for mother's is 95%? Compare the 2 sexes and most children, if their welfare was the basis for court decisions, would not be raised by mothers at all.
As someone who has been on the international side of the men's movement for a couple of decades or so, I can say that there is nowhere left untouched by feminism that I am aware of.
In some countries, conditions are better than in others. Which countries I consider those to be is not relevant but surprises most people entering the international scene. In many countries (you mention Singapore and that is one example) most men, if polled, would likely say that feminism is not big—or even is non-existent—in their country. They will cite cultural complications for feminism without any understanding that it will find a way into ANY culture.
A dogmatic ideology that is willing to lie and cheat (here I refer to both feminism and its parent cultural Marxism) is not going to be stopped by the reality of any culture. Women are happy and well treated? Oh no, they are not: the feminist pillar of women as a Marxist-style oppressed class says so. If they think so, it is because they have been deluded into believing they are happy by the evil oppressors—men—and must be liberated, and turned into productive working units treated in some sub-human (and certainly sub-feminine) manner.
Our global government, the United Nations, is a feminist body. They have said so themselves and they are effectively controlled by the body that is supposed to be there for women but is actually feminist. Most people are unaware of just how pervasive the UN is in their daily lives but there is not a country in the world unaffected.
Is there anywhere left untouched by feminism?
NO.
Only from within each of us can we fight for decency, caring families and healthy societies.
Feminism remains a minority belief in every nation, so if enough of us stand up and resist it, we can win. Our societies can recover, teaching can stop being about indoctrination and return to learning reality, and culture can serve the country rather than fight it.
The problem is that people have been persuaded to think that it is about equality. You have to change that mindset first. The red pill movie was a great step in doing just that.
It isn't even equality that people want, Tom. They think they do on one level until some easy challenges are made:
* If everyone wants equality, why do so many people hope to win big on the lottery?
* How can a man become equal to a pregnant mother as she ensures the next generation?
* How many sports are women at the top? Why is it fair to expect women to be the equal of men in every endeavour, instead of letting them excel where they are naturally suited?
It is with these kind of questions that I occasionally challenge why equality is even a good thing in itself—and whether the person I talk to truly believes in equality.
The intellectuals will often come back with prevarications such as "Equality is about being equal before the law," which is a great entry for me to ask them where in the Western world there is any law that disadvantages women, since I can start talking to them about laws that specifically disadvantage men, and presumably they care about that, since they believe equality before the law to be a worthy goal...
Of course, nobody changes overnight but there are a couple of men now involved in the men's movement who started with just such little crumbs of thought breaking into the comfort in their minds.
The every day sexism cultural revolution gives an example. By Laura Bates.
Now reverse it, every day sexism, a feature length documentary made with A.I. in 2026 for $1000 goes viral.
Shows life from mens point of view jumping through time before and after each equality mile stone.
Boys are seen being boys, then medicated to sit down and shut up, being marked down systemically.
Boys are seen in local dating markets, then in global dating markets unable to compete with being flown out to Dubai.
Girls are seen being feminine and learning to marry young, then to being systematically retrained by sex in the city.
Boys hold door open for girls, then later girls raging at them.
Men are seen providing for unreasonable wives, then later the state intervenes with info graphics showing how women now funded by welfare from men's taxes.
Socially enforced monogamy, then mass single hood, liquidating social capital, causing mass loneliness, atomisation, lost potential by dramatic increase in unfertilisesd eggs lost per day.
Children focus on society with birth rate of 3 presexual revolution, followed by abortion pandemic and rise in pet ownership.
Geniuses inventing things like Einstein, then over a billion aborted people including several epoch defining geniuses who were depersoned before growing up.
...
The movie would have theme of shequality, privilege over pragmatism.
A follow up would be female supremacy with a scare sound track preceding each witches spell cashing of shequality, with a coven of Marxist Feminists waging supernatural warfare on man kind, leading to a lord of the rings style war across the land, where an army of aborted souls returns and swings it against the female supremacist orcs. Allowing the ring of pro female bias to be thrown into mount doom, releasing the Anglosphere from the yoke of female supremacist cultural Marxism.
A new movement hatched by applying Hegelian dialectic to disrupt, divide, and destroy feminism.
Hooking into instincts like anti-slut defense, good mother image, jealousy of attention on bad girls, disgust for mental illness, egalitarianism, tone policing, maternal instinct for control, drama, and emotional supply.
Thesis feminists are sluts, antithesis feminists are matriarchs, synthesis women must get married to be adults. Hence education and media must serve this agenda at all times and costs.
Thesis feminists are barren and get attention as negative extremists, only matriarchs are allowed to post on social media, feminist compliance means mother influencers continually panning unmarried mothers.
Thesis feminists act like men, antithesis female life path excluding men by biology, ersatz social technology granting women achievements unlocked only by motherhood, being a wife, raising children. Feminist compliance means following female life path and shaming girls who fail to launch.
Thesis feminists are mentally ill, antithesis matriarchs continuously manage drama in their large homes, synthesis women lead culture from behind men they build and benefit from. Natural order of restored vehemently by women who excommunicate anti-social altruistic women.
Thesis feminists epistemology is standpoint theory solipsism, antithesis women think of the children and serve their husbands, ersatz matriarchs school and boss morally immature girls continuously. Feminism restores integrity to women and thereby home and hearth freeing men up to push technology and abundance etc.
Thesis feminists hate speech laws ...
Thesis feminists net lifetime welfare ...
Thesis feminists abortion ...
Thesis feminists white knights ...
Thesis feminists media ...
Thesis feminists Marxism ...
We can do all sorts of things by just applying Marxist tools for progression of redpilled cultural revolution jamming off all the woke wreckage of the female supremacist Marxists. It doesn't even cost anything thanks to A.I..
To conclude your presentation on feminist indoctrination, Tom, you could have told us about serious studies of fatherless children and shown us how to distinguish reports of them from the feminist ones. Nonetheless, that's a good way to mark the season. And happy Father's Day to you!
That Nature and Nature's laws take precedence above all and prevail at all times regardless of ideology and the "philosophy" of solipsism (a baseless and unwise ideology).
That a father is a man, who provides DNA.
That a "dad" is a man, who provides everything else that needs to be provided for support.
That a man can be both a father and a dad.
That both men and women alike should aspouse this distinction at all times when discussing fatherhood.
Women are driven to shit test, and they know they can use the state to do it.
Men die every day as a direct consequence of this systematic misandry.
I'd suggest, a rational man strategically with draws, rather than being stabbed to death by a borderline jacked up by female supremacy, or walks away rather than hanging in his garage.
Ironically, that kind of sociopathy causes him to pass the shit test and demonstrate the attractive bad boy feature she subconsciously demands.
If single motherhood is so good for children why is it that the dead beat parent rate for fathers is only 50% while that for mother's is 95%? Compare the 2 sexes and most children, if their welfare was the basis for court decisions, would not be raised by mothers at all.
50%? I didn't know it was that high!
Is there anywhere left untouched by feminism?
Pennsylvania? Singapore? Dubai? Switzerland? Poland? Russia?
I'd like to know.
Googling it just brings up feminist propaganda.
As someone who has been on the international side of the men's movement for a couple of decades or so, I can say that there is nowhere left untouched by feminism that I am aware of.
In some countries, conditions are better than in others. Which countries I consider those to be is not relevant but surprises most people entering the international scene. In many countries (you mention Singapore and that is one example) most men, if polled, would likely say that feminism is not big—or even is non-existent—in their country. They will cite cultural complications for feminism without any understanding that it will find a way into ANY culture.
A dogmatic ideology that is willing to lie and cheat (here I refer to both feminism and its parent cultural Marxism) is not going to be stopped by the reality of any culture. Women are happy and well treated? Oh no, they are not: the feminist pillar of women as a Marxist-style oppressed class says so. If they think so, it is because they have been deluded into believing they are happy by the evil oppressors—men—and must be liberated, and turned into productive working units treated in some sub-human (and certainly sub-feminine) manner.
Our global government, the United Nations, is a feminist body. They have said so themselves and they are effectively controlled by the body that is supposed to be there for women but is actually feminist. Most people are unaware of just how pervasive the UN is in their daily lives but there is not a country in the world unaffected.
Is there anywhere left untouched by feminism?
NO.
Only from within each of us can we fight for decency, caring families and healthy societies.
Feminism remains a minority belief in every nation, so if enough of us stand up and resist it, we can win. Our societies can recover, teaching can stop being about indoctrination and return to learning reality, and culture can serve the country rather than fight it.
The problem is that people have been persuaded to think that it is about equality. You have to change that mindset first. The red pill movie was a great step in doing just that.
It isn't even equality that people want, Tom. They think they do on one level until some easy challenges are made:
* If everyone wants equality, why do so many people hope to win big on the lottery?
* How can a man become equal to a pregnant mother as she ensures the next generation?
* How many sports are women at the top? Why is it fair to expect women to be the equal of men in every endeavour, instead of letting them excel where they are naturally suited?
It is with these kind of questions that I occasionally challenge why equality is even a good thing in itself—and whether the person I talk to truly believes in equality.
The intellectuals will often come back with prevarications such as "Equality is about being equal before the law," which is a great entry for me to ask them where in the Western world there is any law that disadvantages women, since I can start talking to them about laws that specifically disadvantage men, and presumably they care about that, since they believe equality before the law to be a worthy goal...
Of course, nobody changes overnight but there are a couple of men now involved in the men's movement who started with just such little crumbs of thought breaking into the comfort in their minds.
Thanks, Tom. You're doing great work.
Men are good. You especially.
Thank you Douglas! Happy Father's Day!
The every day sexism cultural revolution gives an example. By Laura Bates.
Now reverse it, every day sexism, a feature length documentary made with A.I. in 2026 for $1000 goes viral.
Shows life from mens point of view jumping through time before and after each equality mile stone.
Boys are seen being boys, then medicated to sit down and shut up, being marked down systemically.
Boys are seen in local dating markets, then in global dating markets unable to compete with being flown out to Dubai.
Girls are seen being feminine and learning to marry young, then to being systematically retrained by sex in the city.
Boys hold door open for girls, then later girls raging at them.
Men are seen providing for unreasonable wives, then later the state intervenes with info graphics showing how women now funded by welfare from men's taxes.
Socially enforced monogamy, then mass single hood, liquidating social capital, causing mass loneliness, atomisation, lost potential by dramatic increase in unfertilisesd eggs lost per day.
Children focus on society with birth rate of 3 presexual revolution, followed by abortion pandemic and rise in pet ownership.
Geniuses inventing things like Einstein, then over a billion aborted people including several epoch defining geniuses who were depersoned before growing up.
...
The movie would have theme of shequality, privilege over pragmatism.
A follow up would be female supremacy with a scare sound track preceding each witches spell cashing of shequality, with a coven of Marxist Feminists waging supernatural warfare on man kind, leading to a lord of the rings style war across the land, where an army of aborted souls returns and swings it against the female supremacist orcs. Allowing the ring of pro female bias to be thrown into mount doom, releasing the Anglosphere from the yoke of female supremacist cultural Marxism.
I hope somebody makes that one, quick! Shequality. Love it.
So we need to subvert feminism.
A new movement hatched by applying Hegelian dialectic to disrupt, divide, and destroy feminism.
Hooking into instincts like anti-slut defense, good mother image, jealousy of attention on bad girls, disgust for mental illness, egalitarianism, tone policing, maternal instinct for control, drama, and emotional supply.
Thesis feminists are sluts, antithesis feminists are matriarchs, synthesis women must get married to be adults. Hence education and media must serve this agenda at all times and costs.
Thesis feminists are barren and get attention as negative extremists, only matriarchs are allowed to post on social media, feminist compliance means mother influencers continually panning unmarried mothers.
Thesis feminists act like men, antithesis female life path excluding men by biology, ersatz social technology granting women achievements unlocked only by motherhood, being a wife, raising children. Feminist compliance means following female life path and shaming girls who fail to launch.
Thesis feminists are mentally ill, antithesis matriarchs continuously manage drama in their large homes, synthesis women lead culture from behind men they build and benefit from. Natural order of restored vehemently by women who excommunicate anti-social altruistic women.
Thesis feminists epistemology is standpoint theory solipsism, antithesis women think of the children and serve their husbands, ersatz matriarchs school and boss morally immature girls continuously. Feminism restores integrity to women and thereby home and hearth freeing men up to push technology and abundance etc.
Thesis feminists hate speech laws ...
Thesis feminists net lifetime welfare ...
Thesis feminists abortion ...
Thesis feminists white knights ...
Thesis feminists media ...
Thesis feminists Marxism ...
We can do all sorts of things by just applying Marxist tools for progression of redpilled cultural revolution jamming off all the woke wreckage of the female supremacist Marxists. It doesn't even cost anything thanks to A.I..
To conclude your presentation on feminist indoctrination, Tom, you could have told us about serious studies of fatherless children and shown us how to distinguish reports of them from the feminist ones. Nonetheless, that's a good way to mark the season. And happy Father's Day to you!
I am inspired to think an contend:
That Nature and Nature's laws take precedence above all and prevail at all times regardless of ideology and the "philosophy" of solipsism (a baseless and unwise ideology).
That a father is a man, who provides DNA.
That a "dad" is a man, who provides everything else that needs to be provided for support.
That a man can be both a father and a dad.
That both men and women alike should aspouse this distinction at all times when discussing fatherhood.
First, there is no such thing as a "sperm donor". The men are either potential or expectant fathers.
Second, the fathers, who willfully abandon their children are sociopaths.
Third, the apple does not fall far from its tree.
A warning to women seeking single motherrhood.
Men are required to play a game they cannot win.
Women are driven to shit test, and they know they can use the state to do it.
Men die every day as a direct consequence of this systematic misandry.
I'd suggest, a rational man strategically with draws, rather than being stabbed to death by a borderline jacked up by female supremacy, or walks away rather than hanging in his garage.
Ironically, that kind of sociopathy causes him to pass the shit test and demonstrate the attractive bad boy feature she subconsciously demands.