We see this all the time. When a man has an advantage over a woman...it is an outrage society must immediately address. When a woman has an advantage over a man...you are being misogynist for even mentioning the possibility of such a thing requiring you give up something to WOMEN for the harm you have caused by your observation.
Example: The university I attended in graduate school in the 1990's was a hot bed of FEMINAZI activity. The student body was 40% male:60% female. The feminists demanded that the university address the under enrollment of women in the College of Science and Engineering that was 75% male and 25% female. When it was pointed out the the gender imbalance was actually worse in the College of Liberal Arts 14% male:86%female...those making the point were called misogynists and calls for their removal from the university were very loud.
The OECD graph purporting to show male advantages is also flawed because the relative employment rate, earnings and unpaid work among men and women is a function of women deciding to work part-time more than men. The 'feeling safe' metric is also nonsense because what matters is whether a person IS safe, and women are far safer than men. As for depressive symptoms, these are self-reported and there are significant cultural barriers to men reporting depression that women don't face, not least of which is the lack of concern for male suffering. Depression is also positively correlated with neuroticism and rumination so to some extent it is a product of unhelpful thinking styles. If women took responsibility for their neuroticism and invested in therapy they'd be less depressed.
What the analysis shows is that multilateral institutions and most Western governments have all been captured by the same female-supremacist ideology.
feminist double standard anti male sexism is why men are being discriminated against, governments are full of simp's and feminist hypocrites who only help women, i call it a matriarchy
Hello David, are you my friend on Facebook? I'm banned until I find another way to get back on. Good to hear from you. Substack is a good place. Tom Golden and Steven Baskerville are good people.
I didn't know you had been banned from face book, probably because you speak the truth and its also why i get banned myself time and again. i got banned last time for advising a feminist to have a bad accident. That's all it took , one innocent little remark.
Tom, you are being too modest. This may be much more important than you are telling us. What you are essentially exposing here is that an enormous amount of what Trump and the MAGA movement call "globalism" is rooted in feminist ideology. This is certainly true of the UN, most of whose functionaries spend most of their time obsessing over "gender equality". The very fact that this is ignored by Trump and MAGA, who put up little resistance to it, shows why it is so successful. A very useful exercise would be to go through the literature of other organizations like NATO (https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/5/pdf/NATO-WPS-BULLETIN-SPRING2020_EN.pdf), the IMF, and the World Bank, which have outlived their usefulness and whose mandates have nothing to do with "gender", and show how they are seeking to rationalize their useless continued existence by promoting "gender perspective". Some of this is in my recent book, Who Lost America? (https://www.stephenbaskerville.com/copy-2-of-why-did-it-happen, chapter 5), but more could be done.
Thank you Stephen. I suppose that the Trump folks are indirectly confronting the fems with their attacks on DEI. Maybe that is just the start and they will do more? I hope so. If they don't I don't see anyone doing it in the future.
I wanted to think that myself but I've come to a conclusion that Trump only gets rid of butch looking DEI w0e-MEN, he has replaced them with attractive DEI w0e-MEN many of whom have FAT FAKE LIPS including Kristi Noem and Anna Paulina Luna-tic not to mention Nancy disgrace the definition of DEI
Gentlemen, we have seen what women mean by "equality" by how "equal" woman are in war dead and workplace dead. Just look at the Ukraine conflict. 99.9% of the dead are men. When I was 12 in 1976 and girls started talking about "oppression" and "equality" I asked them to provide evidence of "oppression" and write an essay on what they mean by "equality" because they were not qualifying what they meant.
Over the last 50 years I have asked tens of thousands of women to write down what they mean by "equality" in an essay so that I could respond to the essay which could not be changed. No woman has EVER written down what she means by equality in an essay.
No woman has EVER provided any evidence that there was ever even ONE human society of any significance where women were more "oppressed" by local laws and social norms than men. It's all lies. It has always been all lies. And it will always be all lies.
Great analysis Tom. And you're right - these organisations richly deserve to be shamed for their lack of compassion.
I'd like to expand on your point about life expectancy.
Here in Australia, female life expectancy is 71.1 years - the 11th highest in the world. But WEF ranks Australia a lowly 98th in the world. Why the difference? Because men live for 70.1 years which is too long by the WEF's reckoning!
Incredibly, Lesotho ranks first. Women there live to just 46.4 years but men die even earlier - at 43.1. By the WEF's reckoning Lesotho women are better off though they die 25 years earlier than Australian women because the men in their life die 27 years earlier!
Ukraine shares first place with Lesotho because men there are dying early as well - for obvious reason.
Keep up the good work.
PS: To be precise WEF use years of heathy life not normal life expectancy - it helps decrease the apparent difference.
The main reason of those organisations skewing the analysis and stats is that they learned they can get attention and funding. Homo Sapiens is favoring women and caring more about them as men. As long as this stands, there won't be any change.
The organisations need to downplay men's disadvantages and women's advantages, because otherwise, the 'reports' sound less dramatic.
So what can we do? Well, I believe the only thing we can do is to point the hypocrisy out and not let them get away with this propaganda. We need more of Tom Goldens(TM).
Great analysis and data, but... preaching to the choir. The question is: how to effectively insert an alternative narrative into the mainstream media zeitgeist. Can men find a story that will break the current trend and force a reset? Society in general does not and has never given much of a damn about men, even under patriarchal conditions, suggesting that women's issues generally dominate.
It will never happen. It's impossible to make people care about men and gynocentrism will ensure that feminist goals are implemented without limit or reason… forever. The process should never have been started, which I think men of previous generations understood.
The only option is for men to take back power and status from women by forceful (but not necessarily violent) means. I can't really see that happening either.
Hi Tom, like @Stephen Baskerville I am sure you know that Adam Weishaupt was the "father of modern feminism" circa 1770. Weishaupt was one of the designers of the plans to move from "Rule by divine right of kings" to "Rule by global communism" which is now in place.
The world is run by the committee of 300. I have been told (in 2010) by a man who was very credible that there is an inner circle of 27. The C300 are going to get their way. There is no one who is able to stop this now. And I wouldn't try to stop them now even if I could. You are welcome to talk to me in private on my public email which is peter at peternolan dot com. There is also a direct message feature here on substack that I recently found out about.
The quote attributed to Weishaupt with date unknown is as follows:
"There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration."
Tom, I presume you already know that I delivered the remedy for the divorce courts on 2009-11-26. And I delivered the remedy for our governments on 2011-04-15. I asked men to please help me roll out these two remedies and men said no. Men said they wanted to keep the problems of the divorce courts and criminal cartels of governments and wanted to just complain about them.
Many men told me I should solve these problems all by myself just for the sake of all other men. Men made it very clear over the last 17 years that they will not lift one finger to implement the remedies I created with the help of just a very few colleagues.
Men have no one but themselves to blame any more. I took pity on men because I knew they were too low in IQ to solve their own problems for the most part. And rather than thank me and roll out the remedies they abused me.
Well? How is that working out? Today is 2025-06-25. The remedy for divorce courts was delivered, by me, on video, plus transcript, as proof on 2009-11-26. How is that “we can sort out our own problems” working out for men.
And Tom? Since women did not support the remedy I published in October 2010? In 2011 I delivered the remedy that allows a man to unilaterally divorce his wife and pay her nothing. In 2013 I even tested this in Australia for a case of a man whose wife had him jailed many times based on false allegations.
I issued the wife with one single lawful notice (having already done the strawman recapture). She returned his car she planned to steal. The police dropped her. Her lawyer dropped her. And the husband never spoke to her again. The divorce certificate was issued 8 months later.
In May 2008 I went out on the web and listened to what men in divorce were saying. I read posts by tens of thousands of men on sites like Glenn Sacks site and “Dads on the Air” and “Men are Better Than Women”. I talked to thousands of men directly. The theme was the same.
“We are being slaughtered in the divorce courts! Please won’t some good man save us?!”
So I saved them by 2009-11-26. It took me just 18 months to research and prove the remedy we settled on in three different countries. And men hated me for solving their problems Tom. And how is it working out for all those men who hated on me? Many of them are dead by their own hand, the most famous of which is Sam deBrito.
I gave men the remedy they were openly and publicly begging for in May 2008 Tom. They rejected it. That’s on them. Ok?
"The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name". That is attributed to Confucius. Men who refuse to fight back against women are cowards. Pure and simple. And men are cheap cowards too. They will not pitch in to help me and they won't fight. They just put up posts on social media complaining. Cheap cowards describes 99%+ of men in the west today.
Children are kept in line using the carrot and stick method. Women have run to "big daddy government" and demanded that the stick part of keeping women under social control is a criminal offense for which the husband or father can be jailed. So the men refuse to keep women under social control and we now have the results of doing that for 60+ years.
And yet I fought women, I won the ware against women, and now I am fighting the battles necessary to close out the war. Only Beta Brads will not fight women. And Beta Brads don't count.
An excellent summary, Tom, which all of you readers will find helpful (especially those of us who are incapable of doing much with numbers). You should produce a formally written version, too, for academics to cite in their papers and books.
Thanks Paul. Not only am I somewhat ignorant of academic writing, I am also fairly intolerant of the misandry that prevails. Would you like to take a stab at that? I am certain you would do a much better job than myself. It is actually a good idea...
I was simply making the point to Paul that he is asking you to do something that he is not willing to do himself. I have seen about 100,000+ men do that to me since 2008.
We see this all the time. When a man has an advantage over a woman...it is an outrage society must immediately address. When a woman has an advantage over a man...you are being misogynist for even mentioning the possibility of such a thing requiring you give up something to WOMEN for the harm you have caused by your observation.
Example: The university I attended in graduate school in the 1990's was a hot bed of FEMINAZI activity. The student body was 40% male:60% female. The feminists demanded that the university address the under enrollment of women in the College of Science and Engineering that was 75% male and 25% female. When it was pointed out the the gender imbalance was actually worse in the College of Liberal Arts 14% male:86%female...those making the point were called misogynists and calls for their removal from the university were very loud.
The OECD graph purporting to show male advantages is also flawed because the relative employment rate, earnings and unpaid work among men and women is a function of women deciding to work part-time more than men. The 'feeling safe' metric is also nonsense because what matters is whether a person IS safe, and women are far safer than men. As for depressive symptoms, these are self-reported and there are significant cultural barriers to men reporting depression that women don't face, not least of which is the lack of concern for male suffering. Depression is also positively correlated with neuroticism and rumination so to some extent it is a product of unhelpful thinking styles. If women took responsibility for their neuroticism and invested in therapy they'd be less depressed.
What the analysis shows is that multilateral institutions and most Western governments have all been captured by the same female-supremacist ideology.
Yes, so many flaws. Good points.
Nice, Tom. Quite a take-down of the WEF & Company.
Thanks Jack. This one took a while to pull together. Glad that you like it!
feminist double standard anti male sexism is why men are being discriminated against, governments are full of simp's and feminist hypocrites who only help women, i call it a matriarchy
Hello David, are you my friend on Facebook? I'm banned until I find another way to get back on. Good to hear from you. Substack is a good place. Tom Golden and Steven Baskerville are good people.
I didn't know you had been banned from face book, probably because you speak the truth and its also why i get banned myself time and again. i got banned last time for advising a feminist to have a bad accident. That's all it took , one innocent little remark.
Good to hear from you David. I'll try to get on FB again. But for now, it's Twitter and Substack. I like your advice for feminists
Tom, you are being too modest. This may be much more important than you are telling us. What you are essentially exposing here is that an enormous amount of what Trump and the MAGA movement call "globalism" is rooted in feminist ideology. This is certainly true of the UN, most of whose functionaries spend most of their time obsessing over "gender equality". The very fact that this is ignored by Trump and MAGA, who put up little resistance to it, shows why it is so successful. A very useful exercise would be to go through the literature of other organizations like NATO (https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/5/pdf/NATO-WPS-BULLETIN-SPRING2020_EN.pdf), the IMF, and the World Bank, which have outlived their usefulness and whose mandates have nothing to do with "gender", and show how they are seeking to rationalize their useless continued existence by promoting "gender perspective". Some of this is in my recent book, Who Lost America? (https://www.stephenbaskerville.com/copy-2-of-why-did-it-happen, chapter 5), but more could be done.
Thank you Stephen. I suppose that the Trump folks are indirectly confronting the fems with their attacks on DEI. Maybe that is just the start and they will do more? I hope so. If they don't I don't see anyone doing it in the future.
I wanted to think that myself but I've come to a conclusion that Trump only gets rid of butch looking DEI w0e-MEN, he has replaced them with attractive DEI w0e-MEN many of whom have FAT FAKE LIPS including Kristi Noem and Anna Paulina Luna-tic not to mention Nancy disgrace the definition of DEI
The average bloke has no power but will be expected to take the blame for everything.
Workhorses, packmules, cannon fodder and all purpose scapegoat.
The truth is a patriarchal oppressive social construct.
Social harmony is more important than truth.
Standpoint epistemology posits everyone has their own truth.
It's essentialist and reductionist to try to talk sense.
Logic is also patriarchal oppression.
And gravity too.
Due to solipsism, everything is performative, it's all a fake drama, and I'm the passenger princess.
A quarter million abortions per day globally are just a feminist sacrament offered to Lilith.
Women live their lives with a net negative tax burden, but that's not enough, we need a 5% patriarch surcharge on top.
Vote for the party that offers the most new privileges for women.
It's a zero sum game girls.
Men have the protection and provisions and we deserve better.
Gentlemen, we have seen what women mean by "equality" by how "equal" woman are in war dead and workplace dead. Just look at the Ukraine conflict. 99.9% of the dead are men. When I was 12 in 1976 and girls started talking about "oppression" and "equality" I asked them to provide evidence of "oppression" and write an essay on what they mean by "equality" because they were not qualifying what they meant.
Over the last 50 years I have asked tens of thousands of women to write down what they mean by "equality" in an essay so that I could respond to the essay which could not be changed. No woman has EVER written down what she means by equality in an essay.
No woman has EVER provided any evidence that there was ever even ONE human society of any significance where women were more "oppressed" by local laws and social norms than men. It's all lies. It has always been all lies. And it will always be all lies.
Great analysis Tom. And you're right - these organisations richly deserve to be shamed for their lack of compassion.
I'd like to expand on your point about life expectancy.
Here in Australia, female life expectancy is 71.1 years - the 11th highest in the world. But WEF ranks Australia a lowly 98th in the world. Why the difference? Because men live for 70.1 years which is too long by the WEF's reckoning!
Incredibly, Lesotho ranks first. Women there live to just 46.4 years but men die even earlier - at 43.1. By the WEF's reckoning Lesotho women are better off though they die 25 years earlier than Australian women because the men in their life die 27 years earlier!
Ukraine shares first place with Lesotho because men there are dying early as well - for obvious reason.
Keep up the good work.
PS: To be precise WEF use years of heathy life not normal life expectancy - it helps decrease the apparent difference.
Thank you Tony. Great points about the life expectancy game they play.
The main reason of those organisations skewing the analysis and stats is that they learned they can get attention and funding. Homo Sapiens is favoring women and caring more about them as men. As long as this stands, there won't be any change.
The organisations need to downplay men's disadvantages and women's advantages, because otherwise, the 'reports' sound less dramatic.
So what can we do? Well, I believe the only thing we can do is to point the hypocrisy out and not let them get away with this propaganda. We need more of Tom Goldens(TM).
Thanks Carl. Totally agree that it is time for us all to stand up and start shouting the truth.
I think its follow the money imo.
What are the goals of the overlords?
The overlord money funds the causes that gets them where they want to go.
So women, blacks, moslems get any kind of money they need.
Dudes… especially white ones…. Scheduled for extinction
Brilliant work exposing the dishonesty of the so called 'gender equality' project.
Thank you Duncan.
Great analysis and data, but... preaching to the choir. The question is: how to effectively insert an alternative narrative into the mainstream media zeitgeist. Can men find a story that will break the current trend and force a reset? Society in general does not and has never given much of a damn about men, even under patriarchal conditions, suggesting that women's issues generally dominate.
It will never happen. It's impossible to make people care about men and gynocentrism will ensure that feminist goals are implemented without limit or reason… forever. The process should never have been started, which I think men of previous generations understood.
The only option is for men to take back power and status from women by forceful (but not necessarily violent) means. I can't really see that happening either.
Sadly, I agree.
Hi Tom, like @Stephen Baskerville I am sure you know that Adam Weishaupt was the "father of modern feminism" circa 1770. Weishaupt was one of the designers of the plans to move from "Rule by divine right of kings" to "Rule by global communism" which is now in place.
The world is run by the committee of 300. I have been told (in 2010) by a man who was very credible that there is an inner circle of 27. The C300 are going to get their way. There is no one who is able to stop this now. And I wouldn't try to stop them now even if I could. You are welcome to talk to me in private on my public email which is peter at peternolan dot com. There is also a direct message feature here on substack that I recently found out about.
The quote attributed to Weishaupt with date unknown is as follows:
"There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration."
Tom, I presume you already know that I delivered the remedy for the divorce courts on 2009-11-26. And I delivered the remedy for our governments on 2011-04-15. I asked men to please help me roll out these two remedies and men said no. Men said they wanted to keep the problems of the divorce courts and criminal cartels of governments and wanted to just complain about them.
Many men told me I should solve these problems all by myself just for the sake of all other men. Men made it very clear over the last 17 years that they will not lift one finger to implement the remedies I created with the help of just a very few colleagues.
Men have no one but themselves to blame any more. I took pity on men because I knew they were too low in IQ to solve their own problems for the most part. And rather than thank me and roll out the remedies they abused me.
Well? How is that working out? Today is 2025-06-25. The remedy for divorce courts was delivered, by me, on video, plus transcript, as proof on 2009-11-26. How is that “we can sort out our own problems” working out for men.
And Tom? Since women did not support the remedy I published in October 2010? In 2011 I delivered the remedy that allows a man to unilaterally divorce his wife and pay her nothing. In 2013 I even tested this in Australia for a case of a man whose wife had him jailed many times based on false allegations.
I issued the wife with one single lawful notice (having already done the strawman recapture). She returned his car she planned to steal. The police dropped her. Her lawyer dropped her. And the husband never spoke to her again. The divorce certificate was issued 8 months later.
In May 2008 I went out on the web and listened to what men in divorce were saying. I read posts by tens of thousands of men on sites like Glenn Sacks site and “Dads on the Air” and “Men are Better Than Women”. I talked to thousands of men directly. The theme was the same.
“We are being slaughtered in the divorce courts! Please won’t some good man save us?!”
So I saved them by 2009-11-26. It took me just 18 months to research and prove the remedy we settled on in three different countries. And men hated me for solving their problems Tom. And how is it working out for all those men who hated on me? Many of them are dead by their own hand, the most famous of which is Sam deBrito.
I gave men the remedy they were openly and publicly begging for in May 2008 Tom. They rejected it. That’s on them. Ok?
@Stephen Baskerville
The question seems to me to be, what keeps men from fighting back? Numerous possible answers. I did a post on this a while back. https://menaregood.substack.com/p/why-wont-men-fight-back
"what keeps men from fighting back?"
Tom. That's simple. Cowardice.
BINGO! I was going to say pussy whipped but cowardice fits better
"The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name". That is attributed to Confucius. Men who refuse to fight back against women are cowards. Pure and simple. And men are cheap cowards too. They will not pitch in to help me and they won't fight. They just put up posts on social media complaining. Cheap cowards describes 99%+ of men in the west today.
I would say 80% of MEN are cowards. I do think there is a 20% minority like us who are fighting back.
Men don't fight women. Men don't want to fight women. Men will never fight women.
Men who don't want to confront w0e-MEN are cowards. You don't need to fight children you need to keep them in line
Children are kept in line using the carrot and stick method. Women have run to "big daddy government" and demanded that the stick part of keeping women under social control is a criminal offense for which the husband or father can be jailed. So the men refuse to keep women under social control and we now have the results of doing that for 60+ years.
And yet I fought women, I won the ware against women, and now I am fighting the battles necessary to close out the war. Only Beta Brads will not fight women. And Beta Brads don't count.
An excellent summary, Tom, which all of you readers will find helpful (especially those of us who are incapable of doing much with numbers). You should produce a formally written version, too, for academics to cite in their papers and books.
Thanks Paul. Not only am I somewhat ignorant of academic writing, I am also fairly intolerant of the misandry that prevails. Would you like to take a stab at that? I am certain you would do a much better job than myself. It is actually a good idea...
And Tom should do all that to what end Paul?
Actually, I fed the article into chat gpt and asked it to turn it into an academic article. It did a fair job!
I was simply making the point to Paul that he is asking you to do something that he is not willing to do himself. I have seen about 100,000+ men do that to me since 2008.