We see this all the time. When a man has an advantage over a woman...it is an outrage society must immediately address. When a woman has an advantage over a man...you are being misogynist for even mentioning the possibility of such a thing requiring you give up something to WOMEN for the harm you have caused by your observation.
Example: The university I attended in graduate school in the 1990's was a hot bed of FEMINAZI activity. The student body was 40% male:60% female. The feminists demanded that the university address the under enrollment of women in the College of Science and Engineering that was 75% male and 25% female. When it was pointed out the the gender imbalance was actually worse in the College of Liberal Arts 14% male:86%female...those making the point were called misogynists and calls for their removal from the university were very loud.
feminist double standard anti male sexism is why men are being discriminated against, governments are full of simp's and feminist hypocrites who only help women, i call it a matriarchy
Great analysis Tom. And you're right - these organisations richly deserve to be shamed for their lack of compassion.
I'd like to expand on your point about life expectancy.
Here in Australia, female life expectancy is 71.1 years - the 11th highest in the world. But WEF ranks Australia a lowly 98th in the world. Why the difference? Because men live for 70.1 years which is too long by the WEF's reckoning!
Incredibly, Lesotho ranks first. Women there live to just 46.4 years but men die even earlier - at 43.1. By the WEF's reckoning Lesotho women are better off though they die 25 years earlier than Australian women because the men in their life die 27 years earlier!
Ukraine shares first place with Lesotho because men there are dying early as well - for obvious reason.
Keep up the good work.
PS: To be precise WEF use years of heathy life not normal life expectancy - it helps decrease the apparent difference.
The OECD graph purporting to show male advantages is also flawed because the relative employment rate, earnings and unpaid work among men and women is a function of women deciding to work part-time more than men. The 'feeling safe' metric is also nonsense because what matters is whether a person IS safe, and women are far safer than men. As for depressive symptoms, these are self-reported and there are significant cultural barriers to men reporting depression that women don't face, not least of which is the lack of concern for male suffering. Depression is also positively correlated with neuroticism and rumination so to some extent it is a product of unhelpful thinking styles. If women took responsibility for their neuroticism and invested in therapy they'd be less depressed.
What the analysis shows is that multilateral institutions and most Western governments have all been captured by the same female-supremacist ideology.
We see this all the time. When a man has an advantage over a woman...it is an outrage society must immediately address. When a woman has an advantage over a man...you are being misogynist for even mentioning the possibility of such a thing requiring you give up something to WOMEN for the harm you have caused by your observation.
Example: The university I attended in graduate school in the 1990's was a hot bed of FEMINAZI activity. The student body was 40% male:60% female. The feminists demanded that the university address the under enrollment of women in the College of Science and Engineering that was 75% male and 25% female. When it was pointed out the the gender imbalance was actually worse in the College of Liberal Arts 14% male:86%female...those making the point were called misogynists and calls for their removal from the university were very loud.
feminist double standard anti male sexism is why men are being discriminated against, governments are full of simp's and feminist hypocrites who only help women, i call it a matriarchy
Nice, Tom. Quite a take-down of the WEF & Company.
Thanks Jack. This one took a while to pull together. Glad that you like it!
The truth is a patriarchal oppressive social construct.
Social harmony is more important than truth.
Standpoint epistemology posits everyone has their own truth.
It's essentialist and reductionist to try to talk sense.
Logic is also patriarchal oppression.
And gravity too.
Due to solipsism, everything is performative, it's all a fake drama, and I'm the passenger princess.
A quarter million abortions per day globally are just a feminist sacrament offered to Lilith.
Women live their lives with a net negative tax burden, but that's not enough, we need a 5% patriarch surcharge on top.
Vote for the party that offers the most new privileges for women.
It's a zero sum game girls.
Men have the protection and provisions and we deserve better.
The average bloke has no power but will be expected to take the blame for everything.
Workhorses, packmules, cannon fodder and all purpose scapegoat.
Brilliant work exposing the dishonesty of the so called 'gender equality' project.
Thank you Duncan.
Great analysis Tom. And you're right - these organisations richly deserve to be shamed for their lack of compassion.
I'd like to expand on your point about life expectancy.
Here in Australia, female life expectancy is 71.1 years - the 11th highest in the world. But WEF ranks Australia a lowly 98th in the world. Why the difference? Because men live for 70.1 years which is too long by the WEF's reckoning!
Incredibly, Lesotho ranks first. Women there live to just 46.4 years but men die even earlier - at 43.1. By the WEF's reckoning Lesotho women are better off though they die 25 years earlier than Australian women because the men in their life die 27 years earlier!
Ukraine shares first place with Lesotho because men there are dying early as well - for obvious reason.
Keep up the good work.
PS: To be precise WEF use years of heathy life not normal life expectancy - it helps decrease the apparent difference.
Thank you Tony. Great points about the life expectancy game they play.
The OECD graph purporting to show male advantages is also flawed because the relative employment rate, earnings and unpaid work among men and women is a function of women deciding to work part-time more than men. The 'feeling safe' metric is also nonsense because what matters is whether a person IS safe, and women are far safer than men. As for depressive symptoms, these are self-reported and there are significant cultural barriers to men reporting depression that women don't face, not least of which is the lack of concern for male suffering. Depression is also positively correlated with neuroticism and rumination so to some extent it is a product of unhelpful thinking styles. If women took responsibility for their neuroticism and invested in therapy they'd be less depressed.
What the analysis shows is that multilateral institutions and most Western governments have all been captured by the same female-supremacist ideology.