This isn’t just sociological decay—it’s spiritual seduction. Feminism is the serpent's gospel: ‘You’re oppressed. Rise up. Take control.’ It tells Eve to rule Adam, rewrite order, and mock YHWH’s design. It doesn’t empower women—it weaponizes them against truth, family, and covenant.
Masculinity was never toxic. It was ordained—to protect, provide, and lead in righteousness. But this culture crucified it in favor of emotion, rebellion, and selective victimhood.
> ‘Woe to those who call evil good and good evil…’ — Isaiah 5:20
‘Your desire will be to control your husband, but he will rule over you.’ — Genesis 3:16
This is Genesis all over again. And it’s time the sons of YHWH rise—not to hate women, but to restore order, truth, and sacred masculinity. Hatred of men isn’t feminism—it’s Luciferian. Let it be exposed.
Governments have departments set up just to benefit women, i would be happy to change places with women , make them sign for the military and fight for their country in wartime, while men stay safely at home and claim war affects men most. Women need to stop blaming men for approaching them and blaming men for not approaching them. Women should do some approaching instead. Men need sex and its wrong to blame us for wanting something that is a basic need, Women can get sex easily and they don't suffer the blame and rejection they inflict on us. They exploit men by expecting us to pay on a date which to me is prostitution. They want equal pay but leave all the dangerous work to men, all these things amount to a Matriarchy, no one helps men , we get blamed for every reason and no matter how much better women have things compared to men they still whine about discrimination, so i think we should change places and see how they enjoy the privileges they think men have , including the fact that divorce laws favour women, and too often fathers are driven to suicide because vindictive mothers choose to prevent men from seeing their own children,. If that isnt matriarchy then what is.
Women wouldn't like to suffer the things men suffer , They would try to justify why they should be treated better than men and they would still call it discrimination against women.,
The reality is that much of feminism is actually projection of the conduct and attitudes of women onto men. Most of the negative traits ascribed to men by feminism are actually accurate descriptions of the conduct and behavior of feminist WOMEN! Another reality that feminists apparently did not consider...in their race to empower women via hatred it did not occur to them that hatred begets hatred. The feminist hatred of men induced by feminism has little basis in reality. The male hatred of women resulting from feminist conduct, however, has a very strong basis in reality...and reality always prevails in the long run. Feminism could well lead women into a situation much like Sharia law imposes on women in Muslims societies if they don't kick the habit and start to behave like rational and fair human beings.
... and they wonder why men don't take them seriously.
re: "mansplaining." Simply reply that "mansplaining" is an appropriate response to "woman-stupiding." They Don't Expect That. Or like it.
re: men are dangerous. I've only heard the "Would you rather meet a man or a bear in the woods?" BS about twice. Of course, the idea is to be aggressive to your face. I just tell them, "Take the man. He'll only eat part of you." Laugh ... and walk away. They Don't Like That Either.
... and as you walk, SAY: "And you wonder why men don't take you seriously."
The Bumper Sticker/ “T” Shirt Statement: “I Bathe In Men’s Tears” could be the Central Character Trait for Rachel Ziggler’s “SNOW WHITE Spinoff: She USURPS THE EVIL QUEEN’S THRONE, and has a Bathing Urn filmed with MEN’S TEARS. How does she collect so much daily? The ONLY Shows airing in the “Queendom” are “THE TALK” & “THE VIEW”!
A sobering account, Tom, no punches pulled. It is very useful to have these points spelled out and connected. When feminist aggression emerges, I speak up. We have some well-meaning but very feminist friends who assume that we share their views. I never let their misandrist or feminist comments pass without a word or two. One of these friends recently and proudly showed us pictures of a "hands-off" rally she had attended, as in "hands off my democracy," the sign she was carrying. I asked, politely, how it became "her" ("my") democracy, since I thought it was "our" democracy. I also asked her if there were signs demanding "hands off my shower head," or "hands off rigid, impenetrable plastic packaging" that now wraps some products for adults and the elderly. And what about hands off the tens of thousands of products themselves regulated by 7 major US government agencies. Since the "hands off" slogan comes from "hands off my body," it seems to be specifically feminist and clearly passive-aggressive rhetoric (you endanger me, but I give the orders). She did not have a lot to say, and lucky our lunch was served just then.
Indeed, I have seen the hands off routine before. lol Good for you to challenge her. Hopefully it makes her think about things. Probably not.... <smile>
I repeat this story ad nauseam, not because I have nothing else to say because I have plenty more to say, but the message was relevant and is today even more relevant than it was when I first told it. Read it and weep, feminazis, because a truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent!
****************************
A religious soldier in the Israeli army taught me one passage from the Bible that I repeat often, even though I'm far from religious now:
Ecclesiastes 7:26:
"I found that some women are worse than death and are as dangerous as traps. Their love is like a net, and their arms hold men like chains."
King Solomon wrote those words. He was called Solomon the Wise not by accident! If, after 1,000 wives, he did not find even one to be worthy, I'm not about to try 997 more to reach the same conclusion!
It will come a time where calling her/himself feminist will be a shame.
You forget a final step: womensplaining. By neglecting the so called "manosfere" neglects the validity of male ideas.
But we need solutions, not just blaming women.
¿Solutions?
1.- Independence. The manosfere has been the first to become independent. Boys and young men have learnt a lot about feminism and they have learnt that they are the ones oprresed. Less eduaction. Less life expectancy. And now an inverse gender gap in young ages. Hence the reaction of boys and men.
We need segregation from women so men can run. And we need to rebuilt male spaces as women have male spaces.
2.- We need money.
3.- We need vote. But this vote has to be useful. Gender quotas in universities. Gender quotas in new doctors, lawyers... And for that, we need to raise awarnes about the real situation of young boys and men.
In the UK you are doing better in this regard than in other parts of Europe. Probably, becuase men are more destroyed in the UK than elseware. But you will lead the path!
Yes, in fact men's spaces and voices have been dismantled and no one notices or cares. As long as men keep the machine running it just doesn't matter to people.
This isn’t just sociological decay—it’s spiritual seduction. Feminism is the serpent's gospel: ‘You’re oppressed. Rise up. Take control.’ It tells Eve to rule Adam, rewrite order, and mock YHWH’s design. It doesn’t empower women—it weaponizes them against truth, family, and covenant.
Masculinity was never toxic. It was ordained—to protect, provide, and lead in righteousness. But this culture crucified it in favor of emotion, rebellion, and selective victimhood.
> ‘Woe to those who call evil good and good evil…’ — Isaiah 5:20
‘Your desire will be to control your husband, but he will rule over you.’ — Genesis 3:16
This is Genesis all over again. And it’s time the sons of YHWH rise—not to hate women, but to restore order, truth, and sacred masculinity. Hatred of men isn’t feminism—it’s Luciferian. Let it be exposed.
Governments have departments set up just to benefit women, i would be happy to change places with women , make them sign for the military and fight for their country in wartime, while men stay safely at home and claim war affects men most. Women need to stop blaming men for approaching them and blaming men for not approaching them. Women should do some approaching instead. Men need sex and its wrong to blame us for wanting something that is a basic need, Women can get sex easily and they don't suffer the blame and rejection they inflict on us. They exploit men by expecting us to pay on a date which to me is prostitution. They want equal pay but leave all the dangerous work to men, all these things amount to a Matriarchy, no one helps men , we get blamed for every reason and no matter how much better women have things compared to men they still whine about discrimination, so i think we should change places and see how they enjoy the privileges they think men have , including the fact that divorce laws favour women, and too often fathers are driven to suicide because vindictive mothers choose to prevent men from seeing their own children,. If that isnt matriarchy then what is.
Changing places. I have pondered that one before and would welcome it. I think there would be millions of rude awakenings....
Women wouldn't like to suffer the things men suffer , They would try to justify why they should be treated better than men and they would still call it discrimination against women.,
The reality is that much of feminism is actually projection of the conduct and attitudes of women onto men. Most of the negative traits ascribed to men by feminism are actually accurate descriptions of the conduct and behavior of feminist WOMEN! Another reality that feminists apparently did not consider...in their race to empower women via hatred it did not occur to them that hatred begets hatred. The feminist hatred of men induced by feminism has little basis in reality. The male hatred of women resulting from feminist conduct, however, has a very strong basis in reality...and reality always prevails in the long run. Feminism could well lead women into a situation much like Sharia law imposes on women in Muslims societies if they don't kick the habit and start to behave like rational and fair human beings.
... and they wonder why men don't take them seriously.
re: "mansplaining." Simply reply that "mansplaining" is an appropriate response to "woman-stupiding." They Don't Expect That. Or like it.
re: men are dangerous. I've only heard the "Would you rather meet a man or a bear in the woods?" BS about twice. Of course, the idea is to be aggressive to your face. I just tell them, "Take the man. He'll only eat part of you." Laugh ... and walk away. They Don't Like That Either.
... and as you walk, SAY: "And you wonder why men don't take you seriously."
The Bumper Sticker/ “T” Shirt Statement: “I Bathe In Men’s Tears” could be the Central Character Trait for Rachel Ziggler’s “SNOW WHITE Spinoff: She USURPS THE EVIL QUEEN’S THRONE, and has a Bathing Urn filmed with MEN’S TEARS. How does she collect so much daily? The ONLY Shows airing in the “Queendom” are “THE TALK” & “THE VIEW”!
A sobering account, Tom, no punches pulled. It is very useful to have these points spelled out and connected. When feminist aggression emerges, I speak up. We have some well-meaning but very feminist friends who assume that we share their views. I never let their misandrist or feminist comments pass without a word or two. One of these friends recently and proudly showed us pictures of a "hands-off" rally she had attended, as in "hands off my democracy," the sign she was carrying. I asked, politely, how it became "her" ("my") democracy, since I thought it was "our" democracy. I also asked her if there were signs demanding "hands off my shower head," or "hands off rigid, impenetrable plastic packaging" that now wraps some products for adults and the elderly. And what about hands off the tens of thousands of products themselves regulated by 7 major US government agencies. Since the "hands off" slogan comes from "hands off my body," it seems to be specifically feminist and clearly passive-aggressive rhetoric (you endanger me, but I give the orders). She did not have a lot to say, and lucky our lunch was served just then.
Indeed, I have seen the hands off routine before. lol Good for you to challenge her. Hopefully it makes her think about things. Probably not.... <smile>
I repeat this story ad nauseam, not because I have nothing else to say because I have plenty more to say, but the message was relevant and is today even more relevant than it was when I first told it. Read it and weep, feminazis, because a truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent!
****************************
A religious soldier in the Israeli army taught me one passage from the Bible that I repeat often, even though I'm far from religious now:
Ecclesiastes 7:26:
"I found that some women are worse than death and are as dangerous as traps. Their love is like a net, and their arms hold men like chains."
King Solomon wrote those words. He was called Solomon the Wise not by accident! If, after 1,000 wives, he did not find even one to be worthy, I'm not about to try 997 more to reach the same conclusion!
It will come a time where calling her/himself feminist will be a shame.
You forget a final step: womensplaining. By neglecting the so called "manosfere" neglects the validity of male ideas.
But we need solutions, not just blaming women.
¿Solutions?
1.- Independence. The manosfere has been the first to become independent. Boys and young men have learnt a lot about feminism and they have learnt that they are the ones oprresed. Less eduaction. Less life expectancy. And now an inverse gender gap in young ages. Hence the reaction of boys and men.
We need segregation from women so men can run. And we need to rebuilt male spaces as women have male spaces.
2.- We need money.
3.- We need vote. But this vote has to be useful. Gender quotas in universities. Gender quotas in new doctors, lawyers... And for that, we need to raise awarnes about the real situation of young boys and men.
In the UK you are doing better in this regard than in other parts of Europe. Probably, becuase men are more destroyed in the UK than elseware. But you will lead the path!
I consider perpetual victimhood as a sort of parasitism. It draws away attention and resources away from where it is really needed.
Interesting point!
"Gynocentrism shows up as an automatic tendency to prioritize the needs, emotions, and concerns of women,"
and no body wants men to form groups and share the knowledge and experiences that they have had.
Yes, in fact men's spaces and voices have been dismantled and no one notices or cares. As long as men keep the machine running it just doesn't matter to people.